Are Alien Civilizations Sending Signals in Bacteria? with Dr. Robert Zubrin

Are Alien Civilizations Sending Signals in Bacteria? with Dr. Robert Zubrin

There has always been two clear ways in which we might discover alien life. The first is of course SETI or the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. The second is the search for non-intelligent or simple life. The first is done at a distance; the second can be done here in our own solar system. Up until now it’s always been assumed that the two would only be generally related—you might see radio emissions indicative of a civilization or you might see something like the vegetative red edge indicating a general biosphere of photosynthesizing plant analogues. But there may be a way for technology to combine with biology and allow for intelligent life to communicate through life itself and even pass on vast amounts of information through this method. My guest today has recently released a paper and also devoted a part of his latest book: “The Case for Space” (links in the description below) on this very subject opening up an entirely new way to search for alien life. Announcer: Welcome to Event Horizon: with John Michael Godier. [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] Announcer: In today’s episode: John is joined by the founder of the Mars Society Dr. Robert Zubrin. Dr. Zubrin is an aerospace engineer and inventor and he’s the author of “The Case for Mars”, “Merchants of Despair”, and science fiction novel: “First Landing”. Dr. Zubrin has also recently authored “The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility” which is available from Amazon. John: Welcome everyone to Event Horizon with me: John Michael Godier. if you enjoy what you hear, “fall into the Event Horizon”, hit the like button and become an active subscriber by ringing the bell. Robert Zubrin welcome back to the program. ZUBRIN: Thanks for inviting me. JOHN: Now Doctor, you have a recent paper out, published on Paul Gillster’s blog “Centauri Dreams”; which is someth- a place I recommend for anybody to listen to the show, you should read that blog. Now Doctor, you present a new way of detecting alien life essentially—a new way of practicing SETI; or at least the search for microbial life in the universe. Can you give us an overview of that? ZUBRIN: Sure! The paper is entitled “Interstellar Communication Using Microbes”. In the beginning of the paper I discussed the problems with the current search which is looking for radio transmissions from extraterrestrials which has not turned up anything and I think there’s a couple of reasons why it hasn’t one is that it’s actually not a particularly efficient way of communicating across interstellar space; you need tremendously powerful transmitters and keep them on forever to have a chance of communicating with everyone and/or anyone and and furthermore you’d have to know that they were listening—I mean you know until the 20th century anyone could have blasted radio at this planet for the past 500 million years and no one would have been able to pick up a radio signal; there’s nobody had a radio to listen with you know for 500 million years okay, the Earth’s atmosphere had plenty of oxygen they would have known there was life here and they might have tried to transmit but dinosaurs weren’t listening, the trilobites weren’t listening, the ancient Egyptians weren’t listening okay, and if they did broadcast to us now who knows if we could even recognize it. So there’s that and then there’s another problem with it which is that it’s not adaptive what’s- where’s the upside to giving away your position in interstellar space; I mean what if there are other species that might view you as a threat and do something about you? So that doesn’t really have any motive now there’s another way to communicate them and that is of course instead of sending radio, one could send letters, one could send solid objects, one could send someone a book, and if you were going around the neighborhood and trying to tell stories to children the radio transmission method is like going around in a car blasting a bullhorn at houses and trying reading stories to houses, not even knowing if there any children there—or if they speak your language or anything of the sort; and the and you get out of breath I’m doing that too okay. On the other hand, you could leave copies of the children’s book on the front porch of every house and you would have a chance of reaching someone; and to be a lot less effort. Of course if you try to send millions of books out into all the stars that could get expensive but there’s a way to do it in which the books replicate themselves and that is microbes. Microbes have DNA and the average microbe, average bacteria, has about as much information in its genome as a 300 page book and furthermore, it can duplicate itself, it can treat more books so that you can both print a lot of books yourself and furthermore it can print the books when it gets to the other planet. So one microbe lands on a planet: Well who’s gonna find that microbe? No one’s gonna find that microbe but when it reproduces itself a billion times, someone might find it. Now, however, I don’t think the kind of message that would be sent this way is what you… you know, ordinarily hear about from SETI people the Sagan Paradigm, where first you set a secret number like pi which is something, that any mathematician would recognize that basically says “Hi I’m an intelligent life form; here’s the value of pi. Now that you’re listening, here is our dictionary so you can speak our language, and now you could speak our language here’s the plan for building starships…” Okay this is sort of like what’s in the movie “Contact”. I don’t think that makes any sense. I think if you’re sending information through DNA, the message is the genes and what is the message—what’s the kind of message that we send to people that we don’t know? It’s “be like us”, propaganda. Think “Radio Free Europe”, think “Radio Moscow”, “be like us” or to stick with the book analogy think of the Gideons: leaving Bibles in hotel rooms in the hope of converting people to become religious Christians: “be like us”. Okay? And they don’t have to hang around the hotel room forever and ever, they just hope you pick up the book. What’s the biological equivalent to that? Sending genetic information which is not meant to be read by a crypt analysis using a code-breaking code, but which is meant to get into the biome of organisms their to mutate them to basically to guide their evolution—the mutation is the message. Now bacteria can insert genes into organisms and organisms can have genes that they’re not using right now but use later; or they can have genes that they used to use but don’t use anymore but could use later like a number of years ago some scientists took some chick embryos and they activated some inactive genes in them and guess what? The chicks were born with dinosaur traits! They had teeth. JOHN: Chickens with teeth. ZUBRIN: That’s right! Now birds we know are in fact descended from dinosaurs; the earliest birds did have teeth—they were dinosaurs. Dinosaurs the scales turned into feathers, the teeths went away and turned into beaks, but the long-ago ancestors of birds didn’t have teeth and guess what? They still have the files on hand, so if time should change and birds need teeth once again, they won’t have to evolve them a little bit at a time; birds will be born with fully developed teeth. Just like you know- before- I now run a small aerospace company; I’m a businessman. Before that, I was an engineer working for a large corporation. If my business should fail, I could go back to being an aerospace engineer for a big company. Before that I was a high school teacher. If I can’t get a job that way, I could go back to being a teacher. Before that I was a cab driver. I still have the files, as it were, of my previous careers and if I was forced back into one of those previous incarnations I could do it. So life forms have that. Well you say “okay, that’s not too surprising; birds once had teeth so they could have it again.” But what if… what if we were to find in the genomes of organisms, not plans for past trades but plans for future traits, okay? This would be very interesting. You know- okay what is again any mammal humans mice all have fish genes in them and they actually manifest themselves in the early development to the embryo; the embryos of humans and mice and dogs and cats all have gills just like fish, okay. Then they go away as the embryo develops, it recapitulates the evolution of the species. Well okay, once again that’s not surprising we are descended from fish so we have some fish genes in us. And the capability of manifesting fish traits. What if he found mammal genes in fish? What if there were forward-looking traits? That would mean that somebody was sending genetic information into our biosphere say, offering suggestions for future evolution. JOHN: How would geneticists look for that? ZUBRIN: Well you could try to activate such genes just like the biologists did with those chicks and see if you can activate some mammal genes in fish. Maybe you could create fish with lungs—actually there are some fish with lungs—but maybe you could create a kind of fish that has lungs that is not a lung fish you know, something like that. That would be one way to do it. The other way- I mean look basically you can either look for the messages or you can look at the messengers. Now the messengers are bacteria being sent across space. Now actually it’s pretty easy to send bacteria across space. They’re so small that the light pressure of a Sun on them can shoot them up to very high velocities. If we shot bacteria into space from the Earth and just had them outside of the Earth’s gravity but about the Earth’s distance from the Sun and just orbiting in space, the pressure of sunlight would shoot them right out of the solar system, it would send them to other solar systems. So you wouldn’t need rocket ships for them, they basically have sails capable of catching sunlight and accelerating to interstellar velocities and this has been known in the past, it’s known as panspermia. Now it’s been objective—well ultraviolet light would kill them—well it would if they were naked but what if you put half a micron of carbon of soot would protect them from that? So you could very easily engineer micro sail craft designed to carry bacteria and mass produced them and release them into space; they would look like dust particles that would carry them, voom! All over into interstellar space. So there could be micro sail craft alive arriving in the Earth’s stratosphere. And by the way because they’re so light, if they would hit the atmosphere of a planet, they could slow down without heating up. You have what we call a very low ballistic coefficient. We could look for these things floating around the Earth’s atmosphere; now one problem there is, there’s so much life on Earth so how do we know that these bacteria we find in the stratosphere didn’t come from the surface? So okay let’s look for them in the atmosphere of Mars, let’s look for them in the atmosphere of Venus, let’s look in the atmosphere of Titan, these are all places where they could arrive and get caught and be floating around. So we could go looking for the messengers or we could look for the messages which would be found or, if they exist, they’d be- genome scientists could find them either by sequencing the genomes and looking from that way or by activating what appear to be dormant genes, you know junk DNA. In other words, though those genes and those chicks that the those biologists activated, those were not active they weren’t doing anything they; all this is just “junk DNA” you know? It’s like walking into a building and there’s a bunch of switches turned off and you start turning on switches and you see if some fans start coming on or some lights start coming on or what you know what happens or if a sound system comes on, it starts blasting music at you. You know? There’s a sound system in this building and it’s got symphonies recorded in it and they’re ready to come out as soon as someone throws the switch—well that’s what they found when they activated those genes and those chicks so who knows what’s in there. JOHN: It’s worth noting too, that nature in the microbial world, nature can produce astonishing things especially in regards to space; there are several species of bacteria that we know about so far that can absorb enormous amounts of radiation—the radiation of space and they can dry out completely and do things that- well for example a thermococcus gammatolerans can absorb like 25,000 grays of radiation and still be viable. Whereas a human can absorb about five and it kills us. (laughter) We have examples in Earth’s natural environment of organisms that could survive in space, and imagine what you could do if you… ..imagine what you could do if you could engineer it… ZUBRIN: Yes the very fact that they have such adaptations that allow them to survive space radiation is one reason to suspect anyway that they did come from space okay? You know, if you see someone walking around on the beach wearing a life preserver, maybe he came from a ship. That’s basically what you’re looking at. Now another point about this idea is as follows: While sending radio transmissions across interstellar space has no adaptive value, sending bacteria carrying the genes of your species or at least of your general type of animal across space does, it’s reproduction propaganda is propagation. And you know, you could ask “well why would they want to do that?” Well it’s simple: Those that do it are the ones that we would see; it’s why all of my ancestors were parents. Well why were they parents? Well, if they weren’t they wouldn’t be my ancestors. (laughter) it’s that simple! So if there’s life spreading throughout the universe, it’s a good chance it’s being spread by those who like to spread their kind okay, and and there it is and you know- look, here’s a fac, that life appeared on earth almost immediately as soon as it could almost immediately. We have fossil residues from life on Earth going back 3.5 billion years that are incontestable and some bet people debate going back 3.8 billion years; and that takes us right to the period when the Earth was just getting cool enough to have liquid water—that it wasn’t being bombarded so much by incoming meteors that it could be cool enough and actually have liquid. So virtually as soon as the Earth could support life it did. Now that means one or two things, either the emergence of life from chemistry is something that’s so easy that it just happens as soon as it can, or it means there’s life floating around in the universe and as soon as the planet becomes habitable, it seeds it. It’s one of the two. Either way, it means life is common in the universe, either it originates swiftly wherever it can, which means it’s common or it lands as soon as it can, which means it’s common. Life’s everywhere. But why a particular type of life? Well the the kind that you would see would be the kind that wants to reproduce, and this would be the way to do it. JOHN: So in other words, you could you could start sending out genomes into the universe and seeding life right? ZUBRIN: Right. You could seed life itself to make sure that the planets have life, but then you could try to influence the evolution to your kind of life; you’re just basically you’re throwing in suggestions into other biospheres, “Hey! Try chlorophyll!” “Try respiration!” “Try backbones!” “Try lungs!” “Try warm-bloodedness!” You know? “Try large brains!” How about it? You know in other words, you could be throwing these suggestions into biospheres to try to reproduce your kind of life, and once again why would someone want to do this no reason except that the ones that do are the ones we would see. JOHN: And on that we have to take a break. Announcer: If you’d like to support Event Horizon, you’ll be pleased to know, we’ve recently launched a Patreon. Link in the description below. Or alternatively, you can use your cellular telephone to scan the assemblage of squares on screen now. ZUBRIN MARS SOCIETY: “Hi I’m Dr. Robert Zubrin. I’m president of the Mars Society and I’d like to invite everyone to come to the next Mars Society convention it’s going to be at University of Southern California which is in Los Angeles October 17th through 20th, we’re gonna have sessions there discussing the current Mars exploration program, the plans for human exploration, NASA’s programs, SpaceX’s program, we’re going to have debates: ‘is the lunar orbit gateway something necessary or is it a diversion?’ ‘Should we have a planetary protection program or is this is an obstacle to Mars exploration and settlements?’ ‘What about the terraforming of Mars, is it possible is it ethical, can we do it?’ ‘What does it mean if we do?’ We’re covering the gamut; there’s an open call for papers right now, at if you want to speak there: send in a 300 word abstract. We’re gonna have a contest! Mars Society is running a contest for people to design a 1,000 person Mars colony including its technical aspects its economics, social, political, and aesthetic aspects. We’ve had over a hundred entries. The ten finalists will be presenting at the conference in front of a panel of judges, and the winner will win a $10,000 prize that’ll be interesting too. And there’ll be a lot of fun stuff as well. I hope you can make it! Announcer: And now back to John. ..And we’re back with Dr. Robert Zubrin. Be sure to like, subscribe, and hit the bell for this channel if you want more content like this. Now this opens a can of worms, because if life arose on earth very rapidly, as it appears to have done, as soon as it could, even maybe if we find that the chemistry of life is hard to get going—there scientists looking into that—successors of the Miller-Urey experiment sand all of that. If we find that the chemistry of life is extremely difficult then shouldn’t we strongly suspect that maybe this process occurred and that maybe we were seeded by a civilization somewhere out there? ZUBRIN: Yes it’s quite possible. There’s another mystery of life on Earth, which is that we find no evidence of any life on earth- any free living life on earth simpler than bacteria and bacteria are by no means simple. They are extremely complicated organisms, they have all these organelles, they have a fully developed method of communication from one generation to the next using DNA and RNA, not just a fully developed language and alphabet. We use the Latin alphabet there are some other cultures that use different alphabets, but we don’t expect that cavemen had alphabets lone alone as their primate ancestors. This had to be developed over time. Language is something developed over time, and written language developed over time, and bacteria have it all so the fact that bacteria appear on Earth without any evidence of more primitive ancestors does suggest that they came from space. Nnow if they came from space, did they come through a natural process or did they come through intentional process? That’s something it’s going to take some work to sort out. The fact that panspermia through natural means is possible—and I do think it is possible—across interstellar space and I’ve written papers explaining them. By the way this is- some discussion of all this in the book:” The Case for Space”. That does make the problem more complicated, we’re gonna have to be able to sort out a natural insemination from an artificial one, but I think with enough work we can. JOHN: Now if you’re… if you’re talking in terms of the solar system itself, interstellar panspermia, we also have this idea of interplanetary panspermia where life may have arose on Mars first and was delivered here, or for all we know Europa. How do we determine if life on Earth actually originated here or was planted here microbially just after Earth got nice enough to for it to support life? ZUBRIN: Alright, here’s the thing. If you go to Mars and if you find no evidence that Mars has life or ever had it, that would mean that life originated on earth by itself because if there received it from the outside Mars would have been seeded too. Okay? If you go to Mars and you find that it has or had life but of a completely different type than earth life, that it doesn’t use DNA and RNA uses a different alphabet, that would mean also that life originates naturally where it can because if they’re different from each other it means they weren’t seeded from a common interstellar source. But if you go to Mars and you do find evidence of life and it uses the exact same method of DNA RNA method of communication, okay well that could mean that one planet seeded the other or that they were both seated from the outside. Now Earth life looks like it was seeded because it has no ancestors that bacteria on it. Well okay did it come from Mars? If we go to Mars and find DNA chemistry bacteria as well as more primitive representatives, then that would show that earth life did come from Mars, that Mars originated in life and then it seeded the earth, but if we find nothing if we find that Mars was seeded too, that would suggest they were both seeded from the outside. JOHN: Was Mars nicer earlier than Earth in other words, was it a better place for life to arise than Earth was when we start seeing evidence of Earth supporting life just after the late heavy bombardment, was mars nicer just slightly earlier or do we even know? ZUBRIN: I think it probably was a bit nicer a bit earlier because it’s smaller, it would have cooled faster. But the early Mars and the early Earth were quite similar. JOHN: ..And possibly even the early Venus too which, I mean that’s an open question as well was Venus once a water world essentially? And which water world was the most Clement for life very early in the solar system? I hope we can answer that question because it’s interesting—this idea that we may not be native to this world, which makes a case that we need to go reconquer at the original homeworld (laughter) ‘Humans back to Mars’. – or ‘Earth life back Mars’… if it’s not present there already but- so, to condense this you- We would be able to tell where life arose ultimately just by looking at: We see precursors to bacteria on Mars we don’t see this on earth we see precursors. That means we must be from that body. Can we do that on an interstellar basis can we figure out if interstellar panspermia occurred? ZUBRIN: That’s what I mean. If we don’t find- Earth could have been seeded from Mars. And if so we’ll find pre bacteria on Mars but if Earth and Mars both look like they received from the outside, well then, I think we’re looking at an interstellar source. JOHN: My last question is- alright, we have a sort of you know, you mentioned early on that it’s really inefficient to build a giant omnidirectional radio beacon blasting out terawatts of energy… ZUBRIN: It couldn’t be omnidirectional, it would have to be very directional. JOHN: As I recall though, the original paper on that was Morrison and Caccone and they actually thought: ‘omnidirectional’, right? Do you remember that, where they were saying “well we should look for these to see if they’re even there” but I think it was because that’s all we could look for in the 1960s, realistically now we can look for stuff much more- ZUBRIN Well, they were pointing radio telescopes at Tau Ceti, so they were not using an omnidirectional receiver they were using a very directional receiver. JOHN: So in other words, the most efficient way to do this would be bacteria, what’s your thoughts on von Neumann machines—to do this technologically? Does it make more sense to send a bacteria or to 3D- print out a bacteria using a technology? ZUBRIN: Well bacteria are von Neumann machines. That is if you you know back, I don’t know when 70s or 80s a visionary named Eric Drexler wrote a book called “Engines of Creation” in which he talked about nanotechnology. Building machines out of molecules and these machines would be able to reproduce themselves, so you make nano robots, but that’s exactly what bacteria are. They are self reproducing nano machines so the question is can you program them to do what you want them to do? Well to some extent we can we can program them to make various chemicals and what have you. Can you program them to do more complicated things? Certain ways you can program them to insert useful genes and other organisms. You know if one was to get more sophisticated about this you might be able to program a whole program of bacteria being sent in waves to other planets to initiate and then guide the evolution of a biosphere. The example I give in the paper is ‘consider a parent trying to guide the intellectual development of her child so she leaves books around the house okay well she leaves some letter blocks, she leaves some picture books, she leaves some chapter books, and she leaves book works of great literature. Well the little baby: it doesn’t relate to the books, but it relates to the letter blocks. When it gets a little older now it’s four years old… Well those picture books are starting to become interesting and then when it’s eight, it can start to read you know, the chapter books and then “Harry Potter” and then “War & Peace”.’ So you you don’t even have to send these genes into the biosphere and time them, you could send them all into the biosphere and as soon as the biosphere becomes mature enough to make use of them it does. JOHN: So when we think about these things, when we think about SETI, you know we’re thinking about radio telescopes and you know how hard that actually would be to pick up an alien signal, you know you have to- you’re looking for a needle in a haystack essentially as you point your telescope directly towards a star system to see if there’s anything there and it gets very cumbersome, and then we’re talking about things like using the James Webb Telescope if we ever get the thing in space to look at exoplanet atmospheres and things like that; try to characterize atmospheres and look for red edges and things like this that might indicate biospheres. But it seems to me we should be looking for bacteria as you lay out in your paper. How do we start this process what do the scientists need to do to start looking? ZUBRIN: Well as I say, we go to Mars first of all, we look for to see if there’s life on Mars, once again if there’s no life on Mars it means life on Earth originated on earth because Mars would have been seeded from the outside, if we find life on Mars that’s fundamentally different than Earth life, it means each of them develop their own life form locally. If we find identical life on Mars but with a pre bacteria on Mars, that means life on Earth came from Mars and an originated on Mars. But if we just find both of them just have the same kind of bacteria that Earth has the same biochemistry and no evidence on either planet of a prior evolution leading to bacteria, that means they were seeded from the outside. Now furthermore, if we want to see if there’s artificial stuff going on, one thing you could do is you can look at these Martian bacteria and say ‘are any of these carrying genes for higher life-forms?’ no words how do you know a spy they’re carrying messages like the plans to your fort. Okay? Are any of these bacteria carrying plans for building a fort as it were. That would certainly show that they are artificial and that they are meant to influence evolution. Or we could look for the micro spacecraft, the systems that would be engineered to allow them to survive interstellar travel, tiny little micro sail craft which could be floating around in the atmosphere of Mars and—because they’re light enough that they could do that—and we know they didn’t come from the Martian surface because the Martian surfaces is lifeless. That’d be another way to do it so we could look for the messages that we can look for the messengers. JOHN: Amazing ideas. Thank you for joining us today Dr. Zubrin and everybody check out Dr. Zubrin’s new book “The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibilities” where he goes into those ideas about microbial SETI, but much much more—we live in amazing times folks—let’s all go to space! Thanks Dr. Zubrin ZUBRIN: You’re most welcome. Announcer: That was part one of a two-part discussion with dr. Robert Zubrin. Be sure to like and subscribe and turn on notifications as part two will be released very soon. Subtitles: EK.

100 thoughts on “Are Alien Civilizations Sending Signals in Bacteria? with Dr. Robert Zubrin

  1. Check out Dr. Zubrin's new book, The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility here:

  2. Maybe the pre-bacteria dont leave an easily detected trace or the geochemistry that would give rise to eat is metabolized by extant bacteria before it has a chance to become pre-bacteria. Maybe the fact that life evolved quickly on the Earth is a product of a cosmic fluke, something that would on average take 1 trillion years, but here it just happened quickly by chance and we observe it here because otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe it. Ie observer bias, like Bostrom points out

  3. Jesus Christ ! That was the most ridiculous concept I've heard on this channel. It would be an even less likely way to be identified as an alien message.

  4. The panspermia idea is no doubt a staple of science fiction. The one that comes to mind is from the original Outer Limits series: The Inheritors. Of course, they took the idea much farther.

  5. "Researchers recently identified an ancient virus that inserted its DNA into the genomes of four-limbed animals that were human ancestors. That snippet of genetic code, called ARC, is part of the nervous system of modern humans and plays a role in human consciousness — nerve communication, memory formation and higher-order thinking. Between 40 percent and 80 percent of the human genome may be linked to ancient viral invasions." – That was in an article in the New York times about trillions of viruses falling from the sky each day. Considering how weird viruses are, resembling machines more than a living organism, could that perhaps be an example of 'future' genes? Little non-living collections of matter designed to inject their DNA into a host?

    In any case, what an interesting podcast. I think the fact that there is nothing simpler than bacteria really stirs the pot. We may never know how life originated on Earth, however we have the intelligence and curiosity to see if we can seed a new planet ourselves as a proof of concept.

  6. Did you see what that type X civilization did with the magnetic fields of the black hole at the center of the milky way?

    I always thought Dyson Spheres were art project BS for advanced civilizations. If you are that advanced you can get energy better ways.

  7. Why does this guy have to take a break so often? Never heard any other guy in any other podcast be like after 15 min "okay I really have to take a break now"

  8. Maybe we are at the birth of civilizations- time wise. We may be the ancient aliens. Billions of years lie ahead and we could be too soon. That would make sense as a Fermi Paradox answer.

  9. where do you get your bogus information ? nasa .. ? how do you know what going on .. i bet you believe in evolution ? because if your a fish that became a monkey lmao..

  10. So bacteria evolve many orders of magnitude faster than birds and any bacteria that is wasting energy copying genetic information which doesn't add survival value gets out competed by it's more efficient peers who have removed those blocks . While panspermia is certainly possible adding information in addition to that which provides survival value would be unlikely to persist.

  11. If mushrooms aren’t alien then there’s something wrong with your definition of alien. They communicate through drug molecules. Psilocybin is a modified molecule. Annnd it actually shows you aliens. Out of all the psychedelics, psilocybin is the only one that speaks and will answer whatever questions your little monkey brain can handle. 5 dried grams will produce aliens with shocking reliability. That’s all I gotta say about that!

  12. Who's to say that the "proto bacteria" bits or the original DNA replicating "things" didn't arise on Earth? Any evidence could easily have been: 1. too small to detect in ancient rocks, or: 2. could have been destroyed via natural processes over billions of years, (erosion, volcanism, plate tectonics, etc). I have an open mind, it is definitely possible that life could have been seeded here, either locally, by accident, or intentionally. However, we do have more "primitive" life forms existing with us now. Prions: self replicating strands of protein, and viri: self replicating capsules of RNA/information as the guest suggests… Seeding is possible, but we are living in a world where those building-block "creatures" still exist! They have evolved just like all life has, and they are certainly passing the "fitness test".

  13. Could these be the theoretical "bacteria spaceships" ? ->

  14. DNA being used as a communication mechanism is an interesting idea, though if we're going to be as arrogant as to consider the motive theres also none there that we can make sense of. Maybe something like prometheus without the religious references and the template giant. Also search for jack horner chickenosaurus.

  15. it's also possible no primitive forms of bacterial life have been discovered in earth's history because it couldn't fossilize. additionally, shouldn't we be able to find complex unused genes in bacteria here on earth? this hypothesis is interesting and has merit, but I couldn't help but consider these things.

  16. Anyone could go around making outrageous claims with no evidence on the basis that hey it sounds like a possibility. It's actually known as being a science fiction writer… not to be confused with an actual scientist.

    PS. Omnidirectional receiver??? WTF are you talking about? Just because someone sends a signal via omnidirectional transmitter doesn't mean you need one for reception. What, is the signal going to somehow come in from all directions too??? That makes no sense. And trying to claim that sending bacteria to distant galaxies and planets is by any means easier than mass broadcasting radio signals is beyond idiotic. Send any matter of any size, especially living life forms such as bacteria is infinitely more difficult and infinitely slower. Just trying to reach speeds of 10% of the speed of light would require a ridiculous amount of energy and then you'd require that same amount of energy to slow down in order to not vaporize upon impact or just entry of an atmosphere.

    Please don't encourage such stupidity.

  17. there's a guy studying panspermia who claim to have a picture of a microscopic metallic sphere containing organic material. I don't remember the name of the guy but it's all I could think of during the entire episode -_-

  18. do you think a spacecraft made out of bacteria, that creates it's own athmosphere and is initially powered by the sun, could be used for human interstellar travel? =)

  19. microbe repoducing itself, does he think space would not mutate the microbe through raditation in space? you'll have a totally different story. we mutated over 1000's of years and we're on Earth

  20. I can't stand the guy anymore. Constantly repeating the same thing everywhere he goes. You can predict word for word what he's gonna say. Also half of it is bullS

  21. Very interesting subject, fun to speculate about. I appreciate your work John! The universe(s) is so mindblowing in all it's glory! Personally I tend to dive into space via playing improvised music. I am not a scientist, but I do think about Earth and our place in the universe on a daily basis. Subbed to your channels a while ago, always interesting and well-presented. And I appreciate when you dive into far out subjects, you most often explain what our capabilities are today, so that the listener learns about todays new tech and also all the interesting hypotheses and the difference between facts and speculation. Because you present well, I use less brainpower trying to decipher the validity, than with most news media in general. Also can't wait for the James Webb telescope. Oumuamua out! 🙂 Thanks

  22. But how would you know that the genes didn't evolve and then regress again.. like dolphins are fish that went on land, then back to the sea again. They're mammals.

  23. This guy makes even less sense. If another species on another planet can't understand radio waves they certainly won't get the concept of "reading" a bacterium nor their DNA. This is like coming up with the most complex way to solve a problem. Please go back to aerospace. He sounds like the guy that talks about ancient technology in India.

  24. So, we could potentially spread a virus. What if the bacteria we send mutate into something that kills species on another planet? We could start a war without even realizing it. Wow, this is just crazy.

  25. If anything a tardigrade would be a better choice if this was even a good idea. Tardigrades are the hardiest animal we know of.

  26. Shouldn't those tiny bacteria "spacecrafts" also be laying around our moon surface? Or have I missed the point and you can't really detect them as a source?

  27. Ugh I can't believe I missed this episode I didn't get the notification even with the bell icon turned on -__- I absolutely loved this interview 😁

  28. Why did we need to evolve couldn't skipping some steps of evolution be better, Or could evolving too quickly be dangerous for a species?

  29. Dr. Zubrin is also an asshole who doesn't believe in climate change in calls those that do, anti-human whatever the fuck that means.

  30. The microbes are incredible I believe on the research starts you will find that microbes control our weather here on earth and I believe they are sick

  31. If one did a test and atmosphere you would find billions of trillions of microbes and all these contribute to our weather

  32. i can think of several problems.
    1. How would the bacteria overcome the solar wind to get to the inner solar system?
    2. Wouldn't there be lots of genetic mutations after 50,000 years in space, unprotected from radiation?
    3. how would you distinguish a few alien bacteria from the many millions of tons of Earthly bacteria?

  33. really enjoyed this, the production feels really professional. A few times I thought the video was about to end because of a big subscribe button showing up on the screen and you asking to subscribe. In theory there's nothing wrong with that, but I guess our brains are wired to associate "subscribe" with the end of a video :P.

  34. Oh come on Mr. Godlier! You know for a FACT that our simulated Universe is void of Alien life. We are alone in this evil simulation.

  35. people like dr zubirin, godier, elon musk etc are what would keep humanity alive in the future. they are visionaries and our planet needs more of them

  36. I think there is something poetic in this theory, in the search for alien life and the meaning of life they could have the same answer. Consciousness is the expression of the universe on a fundamental level and the answers we seek 'out there' already being within us would be ironic and fitting…Information is the bare essential essence of what is needed to do anything and the most efficient way to move across the vastness of time and space compared to any more physical methods so the DNA of the universe spread from its beginning sits very nicely with me as a theory.

  37. I think natural panspermia is the most likely explanation.

    A very old and biologically dense world with complex organisms could eventually evolve some that can traverse space. Like Zubrin said, we already have bacteria which could travel interstellar distances via light pressure alone with speed (relatively speaking), even those that can survive the space environment, but as far as we know not both.

    It makes sense that certain worlds would evolve lifeforms that would be spread outward from their planets, bacteria like organisms that escape the atmosphere and get launched across the void. Over time trillions of bacteria could get spread in all directions over the lifetime of the planet.

    Eventually some would reach habitable planets, maybe millions of lifebearing worlds have this same process and the galaxy is filled with bacteria-like organisms waiting to find a suitable place to grow and reproduce.

    Life wants to reproduce and proliferate, the next step once the world has become fully stocked is to find another one!
    I bet we shall find lifeforms on Mars, Europa, in the near future. we have not begun to look in meaningful ways. I have a feeling that we will find anywhere life can be supported that life will arise and all life has a common language and architecture.

  38. So he’s talking about sending microbes to planets we have no knowledge of, to contaminate it and possibly destroy any life that might currently be there? On top of that, millions of years from know, how does anyone decipher the difference between original life and the life we sent?

  39. When Dr. Zubrin says, "if there's life spreading throughout the universe, it's – there's a good chance it's being spread by those who like to spread their kind", all I can think of is, "We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile."

  40. Most comments seem to buy this – so maybe I'm missing something, but to me it sounds completely gaga. Perhaps a civilization that knows enough to create organisms like themselves based on bacteria would seed the galaxy, but the idea that they would modify existing organisms sounds nuts to me. What are the chances that your bacteria would be compatible with whatever exists on other planets? I would guess very close to zero. While I would postulate that if we find life elsewhere in the universe that is genetically similar to us then this would be a possible explanation, but until then I don't buy the logic. I don't accept his reasons for wanting this, isn't it equally likely that you would create rivals for the future and unlikely that more creatures with your DNA-base would aid you in any way?

    Still, it was entertaining as always.

  41. It's an intersting idea, would make some great sci-fi, but seems way too contrived for real life. I've heard the similar idea of sending self-replicating probes out to likely planets – at least that'd be an indisputable sign of ET even if it'd be hard to find, unlike something that exists in your biosphere already doing something 'weird'. All that says for sure is that there's something we don't understand. ET ought to be the last solution we look to only if nothing else seems possible. And would an ET necessarily have DNA at all?

  42. "When I indexed Mankind for
    repopulation, I planted seeds, seeds which would lead to an eventuality – your physical evolution, your combat skin, even your ancilla Cortana: you are the culmination of a thousand lifetimes of planning." I find it very entertaining to hear Zubrin present a serious look at the decades old scifi trope of seeded life and guided evolution (used by both StarTrek to explain bipedal humanoid lifeforms being ubiquitous in the galaxy, and by Halo to explain humanity's ascendance to the dominant lifeform in the galaxy), but I also find it ironically funny that in this presentation so far he has scrupulously avoided admitting that this is essentially an Intelligent Design argument, and one which opts to punt the question of abiogenesis further back in time rather than addressing the possibility of an Unmoved Mover being the origin of life. I'm not familiar with Zubin's work at all, so perhaps he is proponent of ID by an Unmoved Mover and will mention that in Part 2 of this interview, but it would be intellectually lazy (downright dishonest if he is aware of what he's doing) to avoid addressing the evidence for an Unmoved Mover (like his observation of exceedingly complex "simple cell" organisms apparently arising out of nowhere) by obfuscating with the theory of Panspermia.

  43. Dr. Zubrin has IMHO the best short speech for why we should go to Mars. I think it is about 5 minutes taken from a larger discussion but it is my go to for whenever the topic pops up on online forums. It never fails to at the very least soften up the other sides opinion.

  44. I think this is just brilliant, the kind of thinking on another level and out of the box that can make huge leaps in understanding, some say this idea is ridiculousle and give good explanations why, many of today facts started as crazy ideas met with skeptesism and very good counter arguments.

  45. evolution is a filter .you send himans out tiday and by the time they reach a star and planet they wont be the same humans as us.
    this means its more likley that its A i. and it would be pur AI comeing in contact with there AI. haha

  46. I'm dying here, there are only 4 channels worth listening to and yours is one of them…. but I'm out of shows, help!!!

  47. If we try to make life more earthlike could that not also be catastrophic to life that has different needs on a different planet?

  48. No. No they are not. What a ridiculous question. So far I've like your videos, but this one I won't even bother watching because the concept is just so ridiculous.

  49. We're gonna start launching micro sail-crafts piloted by little life-spreading carbon-armored nano-bacterias? Count me in.
    Are we calling them Pansperms?

  50. I'm thinking if bacteria were spread…it would be "En masse
    Millions upon millions of years ago, and the planets that could harbor that life took it up…instead of trying to direct bacteria to a certain planet……your odds of success are much better with the former

  51. What Dr Zubrin is saying makes perfect sense I ve always questioned the way of SETI in communicating and in looking for a sign or message. This sounds a more logical and more practical way. Safer too!

  52. God, science just an awesome inspiration for horror content creators, activating dormant, ancient, unknown DNA. Spielberg take notes.

  53. What if our junk DNA actually contains alien code msg that we will be able to decode in the future when we evolve enough to understand it.

  54. I have to say, about 16 years ago I casually borrowed "Engines of Creation" from my local library expecting it to be an interesting browse. I wasn't quite prepared for one of the most enlightening and optimistic books of the future, I have ever read. He even correctly predicted the rise of hypertext as a major influence on all of our lives.

  55. why can't we get in contact with alien civilizations? this is just like
    hunting the whole galaxy spins very fast think if you aim a laser or
    radio antenna at the planet few lyrs away from earth and send a laser
    beam or radio signal towards the planet when the light reach the place
    where we were aiming our signal source the planet target has moved long
    way from that point even if any alien civilization by accident received
    the signal they would not position the source as the earth at that point
    wont be in the position when signal were send thus … you know the

  56. Alien life might take sending earth life out in the universe as a hostile threat. On the other hand if we are the only so called intelligent life, then seeding our D. N. A will make humans like God's.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *