Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Meeting September 10, 2019 9:30 AM

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Meeting September 10, 2019 9:30 AM


TUESDAY MORNING. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. LET ME ASK THE CHAMBER TO QUIET ITSELF. TUESDAY MORNING. MADAM CLERK, CALL THE ROLL, [ROLL CALL] YOU HAVE A QUAR RUM. THAT TAKES US TO ITEM TWO WHICH WE’LL ASK ALL WHO CAN TO PLEASE RISE AND JOINS. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG WHENIZE THOSE WHO DUTY TODAY TO ASK THAT WE ADJOURN IN HONOR OF MEMORY OF BOTH SCOTT CHAN AND KENDRA CHAN AND FOR THOSE OF WHO THE NAMES ARE UNFAMILIAR. I WILL INDICATE THAT IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE ANYTHING MORE THAN WHOLESOME OR SMILE MAKING THAN FATHER AND DAUGHTER GOING OFF TO IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE ANYTHING MORE TRAGIC THAN LEARNING THAT IN AN INSTANT THEIR LIVES ARE SCOTT AND KENDRA ARE THE HUSBAND AND DAUGHTER RESPECTFULLY, RESPECTIVELY, OF OUR COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONER VICKY MOORE AND THEY ARE UST THAT WHOLESOME FATH EARN DAUGHTER WHO TOGETHER ON DIVE EXPEDITION AND WERE AMONG 34 WHO LOST THEIR LIVES, SO WE HONOR THEIR MEMORY TODAY BY ADJOURNING IN HONOR OF MEMORY OF SCOTT AND KENDRA CHAN FOR ALL WHO LOST THEIR LIVES THE CONDOLENCE, OUR SYMPATHIES AND BEST WISHES TO VICKY MOORE AND COLLEAGUES I THANK YOU FOR THE MEMORY TODAY. I TURN TO YOU FOR THE NEXT>>THANK YOU, PRESIDENT. CHARLES D. SEAVER. THE CHIEF OF STAFF — DEREK, HE WAS MAN WHO DEDICATED MOST OF HIS LIFE TO SERVICE, TOUCHING HE WAS EDUCATORS WHERE HIGHLY IN ENGAGED HEY SCHOOL FOOTBALL COMMUNITY. THE IMPACT OF THE SERVICE AND DAY OF THE CELEBRATION OF LIFE WHEN THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE CAME UP TO PAY THEIR RESPECTS. CHARLES “CHUCK” D.SEAVER OF OHIO, PASSED AWAY PEACEFULLY ON THURSDAY AUGUST 15th, 2019, AT HIS HOME IN WESTCHESTER, VIRGINIA. CHUCK WAS BORN IN SINCED TY, OHIO, TO THE MR. AND MRS. SEAVER. STATE UNIVERSITY IN MOREHEAD, KENTUCKY. LIFE OF 36 YEAR OS WHO HE MARRIED IN OHIO ON DECEMBER 20th, 190 AS WELL AS HIS DAUGHTER CAREY AMOUNT OF AND STEVE, SONS DEREK SEAVER AND McKALA AND JARED T. SEAVER AND CHARLIE SEAVER, FAULKNER AND LYLE YA SHALL AVA, SISTERS KAREN DETRICK, LYNN AND TOM FOKKER DEB AND TERRY HEN SHELL AND IN YOU-LAWS BUD AND ANN WINTER AND SISTERS-IN-LAW LIS SAN DANN ELSON AND JULIANE HEATH HAGERMAN. CHURCH IN OHIO. GREATEST PASSION WAS TOWING HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL AND MENTORING YOUNG PLAYERS. STRANGER. FAN WHO LOVED SPENDING TIME WITH BAT FALLLY-HIS DOGS. CHUCK LOVED SPENDING TIME WITH HIS GRANDCHILDREN. LARGER-THAN-LIFE, ALWAYS WITH A SMILE, AND A POSITIVE ORD FOR EVERYONE HE MET. ALTHOUGH CHUCK NEVER SET FOOT COUNTY, HIM PACK LIVE ON HERE LOVE AND HOPE YOUR DAD’S MEMORIAL ALWAYS BE A BLESSING.>>THANKS, SUPERVISOR UMBURG. AGAIN, OUR CONDOLENCES AND OUR SYMPATHY WE WILL ADJOURN IN HONOR AND MEMORY OF CHUCK D. SERVE. THE AGENDA SET SIDE BY MEMBERS ITEM ZR WITHIN OUR BOARD AND LET APPARENTLY 16 REQUESTS TO SPEAK. CARDS AT THE BACK OF THE CHAMBERS, WILL CALL FOLKS UP AND ASK TO YOU LINE IF YOU YOU CAN, PUBLISHED AGENDA, WE HAVE 16 OR TO ONE MINUTE SO ASK YOU TO BE AS CEPS AS YOU CAN THIS MORNING, PLEASE. THIS ORDER IF THEY CAN. ZED FELLEDMAP, MICHAEL CABANIO, DAVID SUL LYNN VANN, JESSE, FOLLOWED BY CHRISTINA, I BELIEVE IT IS EGAN. FOLLOWED BY FRANCIS CHUNG. FOLLOWED BY LIBERTY GUZMAN. THEN PAMELA HAMILTON. MR. FELDMAN I SEE YOU STEPPED SEE MA HAS WORKED WELL THE COUNTY AND RELATIONSHIP WE HOPE INCREASE BEHIND YOU WILL SEE MEMBERS HOLDING SIGNS DETAILING THE PENSION, CONTRIBUTIONS NOT SHARE. AND HEAR HOW IT HELPED DURING THE RECENT TRAGEDY AND HOW WE RECENT SICK WROUGHT. COMMUNITY FIRST. LABOR RELAGS IS NOTED A DRESSING AT THE TABLE OFFERING SMALL REDUCTION IN PLACE OF A SALARY INCREASE. OFFER A SALARY INCREASE. WE CANNOT AFFORD TO REPLACE GUARANTEES WITH FUTURE PROMISES. REWARD THE SERVICE TO THE COUNTY THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.>>THANKS. WELCOME.>>GOOD MORNING. I HAVE WORKED FOR THE COUNTY FOR ALMOST 19 YEAR AND PROUD TO SERVE HERE. HUM BEFORE HE DEPARTMENTS INCLUDING COMMUNITY. IN THE PLAYERS MEET IN I LOST NEARLY 4H$00 EACH PAY PERIOD WERE THE TAKE HOME PAY AND THIS IS THE LOSS OF $800 EACH MONTH ON NEARLY $1,000 EACH YEAR. THIS ACTIVITIES SINCE I COULD NOT AFFORD TO PAY THE COST FOR MY PARENTS. CURRENT POSITION AS A MALL INCREASE END PAY WOULD HELP. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MICHAE>>DR. SMITH, MEMBERS OF THE KNOW SPEAK I AM HERE TO MENTION THE PACT THAT MEMBERS ARE FIRST RESPONDERS THERE ARE SOME FOLK THINGS HE BACK OF THE ROOM MINE OFFICE THAT WEAR UNION FOR AND FIRST RESPONDERS WERE AND AT LEAST NINE OF RUSS MEMBERS FAMILIES. THE SCENE. THE EOC AND THE CITY OF GILROY. WE ALSO HAD ANOTHER ONE RESPOND TO COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS. WE WERE INTEGRAL PART IN THE SYSTEM. FINALLY, I WOULD LIKE TO PUSH FOR PENSION PARITY. THAT ONLY PAY 4% TOWARD PENSION WHERE I HAVE TO PAY 16%.>>AND ASK THE NEXT SEAM ARE MY NAME IS JESSE. AN EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBER AND WORK AT VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EMERGENCY ROOM. HAPPENED TO BE THE WORK ON THE DAVE THE GARLIC FESTIVAL SHOOTING HAPPENED. I STARTED MY DAY AT NOON. I WORKED ON E-MAIL, TIME CARD AND GOING TO LUNCH. I SAID, WELL, NOT REALLY, I AM GOING TO GET SOMETHING TO FINISH 8:00. AWAS LEAVING, I GOT A CALL THAT THERE WAS ALL THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE, SO I RUSH BACK TO HE WAS THERE UNTIL 1:30 HELPING MY STAFF, CALLING STAFF IN, AND IT WAS, EVERYBODY SEEMED TO MOVE SMOOTHLY. WHEN WAS ASKED TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS. COMM>>GOOD MORNING. I AM A MEMBER AND HAVE BEEN WITH ASSIST AND DIRECTOR OF THE AM SEE. PROCESS AND DEADLINES TO AROUND TIME THAT IS SIMILAR TO H.R. LEE YEAR AGO AND STILL HAS NOT HAD PROJECTED DATE OF UNIVERSAL SUPPORT OF THE LEADERSHIP AS WELL AS THE UNION. HIM HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IS EVOLVING FIELD AND REPLEC THE BASIC WORK WE DO IN AS A REASONABLE TURN AROUNDTIME EMPLOYEES. GET A PROCESS THAT, TWOS FOR THE COUNTY.>>COULD I ASK THE NEXT SPEAKER I HAVE WITHIN BEEN THE COUNTY FOR 14 YERS AND RECENTLY ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AT SANTA CENTER. EXPERIENCED $350 LOSS IN BASE PAY PER PAY PERIOD. GIVEN THAT SALARY AND GIVE IN THE COST OF LIVING, I AM UNABLE TO REMAIN IN THE POSITION IF THE I HAVE INFORMED MY DIRECTOR THAT SITUATION. TO PROVIDE US WITH A BETTER CORN RACT, REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION, AND TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE WHO WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE ARE NOT PUNISHED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU AGAIN. NEXT WEAK BREAKER COME ON UP. THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM YEARS. TO STAY IN THE CONTAIN WANT TO BE IN THE AREA TO LIVE AND WORK. THE CHALLENGE IS OUR SALARIES AND OUR PENSION. MANY OF US WERE SHOCKED JULY FIRST THINKING HE WOULD BE LEAST COST OF LIVING INCREASE, AND THAT OUR PENSION WOULD NOT IT WAS A SHOCK TO SEE THAT NOT ONLY DID OUR PAY GO DOWN, BUT MORE MONEY TAKE BE OUT OF THE BUY PAY AND PUT NOT A THE PENSION. AM GETTING PAID $90 LESS NOW THAN I WAS JULY FIRST. THAT WAS A SHOCK. AND WORK ON MY BILLS TO PAY SCHOOL. AND LIKE MANY OFS, WE REALLY WANT TO BE HERE. SO PLEASE, WHEN YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT THE CONTRACT, THINK ABOUT US.>>Z AS YOU COME UP WILL CALL UP MARY BETH ROGER, TERESA PEREZ, DELORES MORALES, EVAN DOWELING, KATE HAYNE, SCOTT, AND MR. TROUT. WELL COME AGAIN.>>GOOD MORNING, MEMBERS OF HE BOARD. AM SUPE VEER VISOR. WE PROTECT THE COMMUNITY RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN INCLUSIVE ACCURATE AND TRANSPARENT ELECTIONS THEN COUNTY OF SANTA THE PER MONTH IN PAY DUE TO HIGHER PENSIONS AND LOST HOWEVER, DESPITE THIS, WE ALL CONTINUE TO DO THE HOURS WE DO EVERY ELECTION CYCLE. WITHOUT A SIGNIFICANT REEDINGS TO CONTINUE TO DISCOURAGE EMPLOYEES LIKE MYSELF FROM PROMOTING AND BETTER SERVING OUR COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. AS MEMBER OF? THE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS TO SEE THIS REDUCTION ALONG WITH SALARY CONTRACT.>>THANKS. MANAGE YEARS. DFCS WAS HIT WITH A WORK ACTION EXPERIENCE AND PROFESSIONALISM PROVIDES, SE MA MEMBERS WORKED WITH ADMINISTRATION TO LIST A LIST OF NEEDS THAT WOULD ENSURE CHILD SAFETY. SE MA MEMBERS SEE ST.ED TO MEMB POSSIBILITY AM ACTION NO CRITICAL NEEDS WERE UNMET. THIS IS A TESTAMENT TO MEMBERS PROFESSIONALISM AND WILLNESS TO BE FLEXIBLE IN A CRISIS. WE BELIEVE THAT THIS ONE INSTANCE EXEMPLIFIES THE DAILY WORK ETHIC AND HIGH TAN DARED OF MEMBERS AND JUSTIFIES THE CONTRACT PROPOSALS WE HAVE PUT FORWARD. AOR. I AM TERESA PEREZ. AM HERE TODAY TO TALK ABOUT THE PENSION CONTRIBUTION. I PROMOD TO OFFICE MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR LAST ACCEPT 2019 AND TECHNICALLY WAS PROMOTION BUT COMPLETELY A FINANCIAL SETBACK. WHEN I BOUGHT A FAMILY’S HOME IN GILROY, WHERE I WORKED, MY COAL COST OF PROPERTY TAX AND START FUND. PROPERTY TAXES AND YET TO PUT A DIME IN COLLEGE FUND AFTER RESOLVING THE NEGOTIATOR I ENJOYED TWO PAY PERIODS OF 8% GAINED RESPONSIBILITY OF 18CST’S AT THREE LOCATION AND ONE OF THE LARGEST OFFICES BUT MY $12,000 PROMOTION WAS BE A SMOOSHED THE PENSION CONTRIBUTION. I AM 100% A LIVING EXAMPLE WHY MANY ARE TURNING A WAY FROM PROMOTING. SERVICE OFFICES AND NOW I AM OBLIGATION AND OF FEAR PAY RAISE. ROUD PROUD TO SERVE AS CEMA YEARS. WE HAVE BEEN ARE GER GRUEL THE THE CONTRACT IN’S DRESSING THE MOTIVATED OUR WORK FORCE TO TAKE ACTION. IMPACT ON OUR LIVES, OUR FAMILIES, AND THE LIFE DECISIONS PENSION CONTRIBUTION LOSS OF PAY WHEN PROMOTED, COUNTY PROCESS THAT IMPACT HIRING, WORKLOAD AND AND WE HOPE TO RESOLVE THESE ISSUES AT THE BARGAINING TABLE. WE ARE THE BACKBONE OF THE WHO DESERVE AND DEMAND A PAIR CONTRACT NOW.>>L EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE SOUTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO SANCTION A TRIKE.>>EXCUSE ME. AND EX X IT. CONTINUE SPEAKING.>>LAST WEEK THE LABOR MOVEMENT SOUTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO SANCTION A TRIKE BY 521 MEMBERS AGAINST THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. NG I ALONG WITH MY WIFE MARIA HERNANDEZ, IN THE PARKING LOT THERE. PRACTICE OF JEFF SMITH, BUT SOME CALLING FOR HIS TERMINATION IN THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FIRE JEFF SMITH AND CARRIED IT OVER JEFF SMITH’S HEAD AS HE TERNED THE QUARTERS OF THE SOUTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL BEFORE JEFF SMITH ENTERED HE STOPPED AND SMEARED AT THE SIGN WHICH ITEMIZED ABUSES IN THE LEADERSHIP. THE DEMAND FOR ECONOMIC JUST ALL UNIONS TAUGHT USE THE PROPOSAL AS A TEMPLATE.>>WE ARE GOING TO INVITE THE NEXT SPEAKER UP. WHY DON’T WE M WAIT A MOMENT SO WE CAN HEAR YOU CLEARLY.>>LAST FEBRUARY I MET TO DISCUSS HOW THE ENABLERS OF CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE CRIMES HE SAID WE DIDN’T NEED ANY NEW LAWS THAT PRESENTATION HIGH SCHOOL OFFICIALS LIKE MARY MILLER SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH CONSPIRACY BECAUSE THEY UP MULTIPLE INSTANCES OF SEXUAL NOT UNLIKE OFFICIALS AT MICHIGAN STATE, THEY KNOWINGLY EN ENDANGERED CHILDREN FOR DECADES? PROTECT GIRLS LIKE 17-YEAR-OLD ME FROM SEX ABUSE. I WANT TO BELIEVE JUSTICE IS BLINKED IN THIS COUNTY. PROMINENT CATHOLIC LEADERS GO UNCHECKED WHEN SEXUAL PREDATORS ROAM FREE, WHEN I HEAR MARY MILLER ASSURED THE BOARD, NO ONE ME ANY TRET STRAIGHT ANSWER, THE DA’S OFFICE WON’T RETURN MY PHONE CALL, SO I AM HERE, AGAIN, ADVOCATING FOR DOZENS OF VICTIMS AND BEGGING FOR ANYONE TO GIVE A DAMN.>>ALL RIGHT. MR. TROUT I SEE YOU APPROACHING. COME RIGHT UP.>>EXTRA, REEKS INCH HEAR ALL ABOUT IT. WHY IS IT THE MERCURY NEWS TELLING US ABOUT MICHAEL FLYNN? WHY IN SET UP THE MERCURY NEWS TELLING US THESE IMPORTANT THINGS THAT THEY ARE BRING UP ABOUT CPS AND THE FENTANYL WITH CHINA. PRAY HE SMASHES GOOGLE, COME OUT TO SAY AND GOOGLE IS GOING TO VOTE FRAUD. KNOW ABOUT VOTE FRAUD WHEN I RAN AGAINST DON IN 2010 THEY STOLE IT GETS INTO HOW THE PROSECUTION OF HIKER KAEL FLYNN HID EX CULL STORY EVIDENCE FOR EIGHT MON AND IS GOING TO GO AGAINST THEM FUNDS, ALL RIGHT. NOW 95% SUCCESS RATE BECAUSE THEY HAVE UNLIMITED FUNDS FAN THEY CAN CHARGE SOMEONE THEY ARE VERY ATTEMPTED TO PLEAD GUILTY WHEN THEY ARE ACTUALLY INNOCENT.>>OUR NEXT SPEAKER. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME ON UP? ARE YOU IN THE CHAMBERS?>>THANK YOU. MARY MILLER THAT HAS BEEN COMING IN HERE, A COUPLE OF SPEAKERS BEFORE ME, I WAS ABLE TO CHOP UP ON YOUTUBE AND IT HAS BEEN GETTING INTERESTING FEEDBACK ABOUT IT. JUSTICE. OF STU FILE CIVIL LAWSUITS TO SHUT THEM UP. THAT THEY HAVE BEEN RUNNING THROUGH CIVIL COURT AND STACKING THESE CASES IN FRONT OF DIFFERENT JUDGE AND DIFFERENT NOT ON TOP OF THE LEFT HAND. FORTUNATELY SOME OF THE BAILIFFS WERE ABLE TO INFORM ME WHAT IS THIS WOMAN NEEDS SOME COMMUNITY JUSTICE AND NEEDS AN INVESTIGATION. WE ALL KNOW WHAT THE POLICE DOING IT FAR LISTENING TIME. ARE RECEIVE. AND I BELIEVE IT IS MEAL LA CUPA. IF YOU ARE ONE OF THOSE THREE FOLKS. STOCK. PEOPLE. THE OVERSTOCK IS VERY, VERY HAVE SACRED AREA TO THEM. UNFORTUNATELY, BECAUSE OF THE HORRID SITUATION IN THIS WERE PEOPLE, THE SERGEANT FAMILY EARLY 2,000’S OR I CAN’T REMEMBER WHAT YEAR? THEIR LAND, THE SERGEANT FARMS WENT BANKRUPT AND AGENCY BOUGHT IT NOW THAT DEBT AGENCY WANTS TO MINING QARLY THAT IS GOING TO AND MAKE IT INTO GRAVEL AND SAND. NO, THIS AREA WILL NOT BE SOLD AND MUST BE GIVEN BACK TO THE PEOPLE SO THEY HAVE THEIR SACRED LAND.>>THANKS.>>THANK YOU FOR THE OPTION TO SPEAK. SPEAK AS A COMMUNITY MEMBER. AM THE SON OF AN IM GRN IN AND BAY AREA NATIVE. NEARLY 30 YEARS AGO WHEN WAYS LITTLE BOY, I WOULD HEAR MY FATHER SHARE HIS STRUGGLES WITH MY BROTHER AND I. HOUR LONG COMMUTE, WORKING 90-80 HOUR WEEKS. SIX YEARP AND THREE-MONTH-OLD. WHEN I SHARE MY CENTERINGLES I SPEAK TO HER ABOUT DRIVING TWO 0 TO 80 HOURS A WEEK. WONDER WHAT MY FUTURE WILL BE LIKE 30 YEARS FROM NOW. I URGE THE BOARD TO DRASTICALLY INCREASE FUNDING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, CHILD CARE, HEALTH CARE SERVICES POE PROVIDE BY THE COUNTY. THANKS. I BELIEVE I WAS TOLD EARLIER THAT MICHAEL IS NOT HERE OK. VICTORIA. PLEASE COME FORWARD. WELCOME.>>GOOD MORNING. I AM VICK YORE. I HAVE BEEN PLOATED ADDS CEMA MEMBER IN 2019 AND WORKING AS SUPE VICEROY’S ARE AT THE I HAVE BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER AND HAVING MY SURGERY ON HYUNDAI. SIGNIFICANTLY. 16% WITH MY PREVIOUS POSITION AS CEIU I EARNED MORE WITH MY TAKE HOME AND ABLE TO SAB MER AND PUT MORE AWAY IN DEFERRED COMP NOW WITH A PENDING MEDICAL LEAVE I HAVE HAD TO DECREASE MY CONTRIBUTES FROM 15 TO 7.5%. I STILL DO NOT TICK HOME WHAT I MADE AS 521 MEMBER. IT IS $800 MONTHLY PAY DECREASE AND I DEEP IN THE SAVES EACH IN CEMA MEMBERS FOR ALL THEIR DAILY WORK THAT WE DO, I AM A SINGLE IN COMPROVIDER TRYING TO MAKE INCOME AND PAY FOR MY MORT GAG TO CALL HOME. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN’T OVERLOOKING ANYONE. LET ME CHECK WITH THE CLERK. ANY OTHER CARDS UNDER PUBLIC COMPONENT WE DO NOT. AND THAT TAKES US TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGAIN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND ANY CHANGES TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ AGAIN. THANK YOU. WE HAVE HAVE A HAND FULL OF CARDS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON IN ORDER TO LET MEM KNOW THE STATUS OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND THE PROPOSED UPDATE WHAT I WILL DO IS ASK THE CLERK TO TO OUR CONSENT CALENDAR AND OUR AGENDA AND THEN WE’LL GO DOWN ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED TO FRESH MEMBERS OF OUR BOARD AND AND THEN WE’LL COME DONE THE ROW CALENDAR. THROUGH THE CHANGES WHICH I VERSION HE ISP ON THIS GOLD OF THE CHAMBERS THANK. COUNCIL TO CONTINUE ITEM 7 TO ITEM 7 IS A HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY RELATING TO AT 2300 INBOARD LANE SAN JOSE NECESSARY OR THE COUNTY’S RECEIVING ASSESSMENT AND INTAKE CENTER AND PROPERTY OF HEART AND MINES CENTER INCORPORATED. THE HEARING LISTED AS ITEM 1 ITEM NUMBER 1 FIRST THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FROM PARK PURPOSE AS PART OF COYOTE CREEK PARKWAY INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN AND MASTER PLAN PARCEL 670-08-036-040-049 AND-056 AS PART OF EXCHANGE WITH THE CITY OF SAN LO SAIL. WE HAVE A WE RE QUEST IF FROM VICE PRESIDENT CHA DHOWS HOLD ITEM 12 TO SEPTEMBER 2019 TO APPROVE REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION AND OR COUNTY COUNCIL TO REPORT TOP THE BOARD WITH OPTION FORCE CONSIDERATION CORPORATION. WE HAVE REQUEST FROM SUPERVISOR TO ADD ITEMS NUMBER 16 AND 23 TO CONSENT CALENDAR AND ITEM NUMBER 16 IS APPROVE TO COUNTY COUNCIL TO PROPOSE THE PROPOSED FEDERAL NUTRITION ADYSASSISTANCE ITEM NUMBER 23 TO RESELF A RELATING TO AND INVENTORY AND OF CLAM PROGRAM PROGRAMS AT ELMWOOD CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX AND MAIN JAIL COME LEX AND RE-ENTRY RESOURCE CENTER AND CONTACT VISITATION IN THE JAIL. ARE QUEST FROM SUPERVISORS WASSERMAN TO ADD ITEM NUMBER 24 RECOMMENDATION RES LATING TO AGREEMENT WITH FIRST FIVE SANTA CLARA COUNTY RELATING TO PROVIDE PARENTING EDUCATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES. WE HAVE REQUEST FOR SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN TO ADD NUMBER 26 TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR. ITEM NUMBER 26 IS TO RECEIVE REPORT FROM THE PA CYCLE THERE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS AND ITEM NUMBER 2207 THE CONSENT CALENDAR. REPORT FROM THE FACILITIES AND FLEET DEPARTMENT RELATING TO THE STATUS OF THE SERVICE MODULE AND OPERATIONAL PLANNING PLAN. WWE HAVE A REDEGREES SUPER ISOR WASSER NOONE ADD 28 AND 31 TO ITEM NUMBER 28 TO ONSIDER RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CUSTODY HEALTH SERVICES STACK WORK AREA MODIFICATIONS. ITEM NUMBER 31 IS TO RECEIVE REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ASSESSMENT OF COUNTY PROGRAMS FOR FALL FAMILY FINDING A AND REUNIFICATION AND REQUEST TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR. ITEM NUMBER 32 IS TO RECEIVE REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE THINK MEN TATION OF THE SUPERVISION SERVICE AND ADDITION WE HAVE A REQUEST FROM SUPERVISORS WASSER MACHINE AND ELLENBERG TOAL ADD 33 AND 34 TO THE CALENDAR. ITEM NUMBER 33 IS TO RECEIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JAIL DIVERSION PROGRAM AND EXPANSION CLIENTSIENTS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS AND MEMBER AL HEALTH AND ITEM NUMBER 34 TO RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE TERMINOLOGY USED TO DEFINE INMATE HOUSING AND WE HAVE A QUESTIONEST FROM FROM SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN TO ADD 5, 36, 3209 THE CONSENT CALENDAR. ITEM NUMBER 35 IS TO RECEIVE TRANSFORMATION EFFORTS IN COULD LAN BRATION OF THE STANFORD STERN FOR LEADERSHIP AND TRANSFORMATION. ST HOUSING PROCEEDS. ITEM NUMBER 39 IS TO RECEIVE SUPPORT FOR THE SANTA CLARA ARE A COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY AND SECTION 8 PROJECT BASED VOUCHER AND REQUEST FROM VICE PRESIDENT CHAVEZ ON ITEM NUMBER 40. ITEM 40 IS TO RECEIVE REPORT ARE THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE RELATED TO THE EQUITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF COUNTYWIDE RACIAL AND SOCIAL EQUITY STRATEGY AND WE HAVE A REQUEST FROM SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN TO ADD ITEMS 41, 43, 44 TO THE CALENDAR AND ITEM NUMBER 41 IS TO CONSIDER RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO SERVICE ROW PROPROVIDE. ITEM 43 IS TO APPROVE REQUESTS FOR NUMBER 22 FOR $207,000. TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM THE RESERVE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RELATING TO COMMUNITY RESTITUTION AND ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE FORCE CODE TEXTIVE LEADERSHIP SALARY AMENDING SANTA CLARA ARE A RY ORANCE .19 RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEES BAY REINCREASING THE FLAT RATE SHERIFF CLASSIFICATION BY 3.09%. WE HAVE REQUEST FROM ADMINISTRATION TO HOLD ITEM NUMBER 45 TO SEPTEMBER 24th, 2019. NUMB ITEM NUMBER 46 IS TO APPROVE TECHNOLOGY USE POLICIES OR EXISTING TECHNOL LOW GO AND RENEWED AND APPROVED. WE HAVE A REQUEST FROM ADMINISTRATION TO HOLD NUMBER 47 TO OCTOBER 8, 201. NUMB ITEM UMBER 46 IS TO IMPROVE USE POLICIES FOR EXISTING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND HAVE BEEN RENEWED AND FORMALLY GALLEY TY. HOL ITEM NUMBER 49. ITEM NUMBER 49 THET ADOPTION F 644 ADDING CHAP PER 2 TO DIVISION E19 OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ORDINANCE CODE RELATED TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF FIREARM IN AREAS OF THE COUNTY. WE HAVE REDEGREES ADMINISTRATION TO HOLD ITEM NUMBER 50 TO SEPTEMBER 24th WHEREVER 2019 AND NUMB ITEM NUMBER 50 IS TO RECEIVE THE REPORT FROM THE SENIOR TAX EXCESS AND REDEGREES ADMINISTRATION TO HOLD NUMBER 62 ITEM NUMBER 62 IS TO APPROVE RETROACTIVE REVENUE AGREEMENT WITH PART 2 WITH THE COUNTY’S RETIREE FILINGS TO PAIL FOR ADDITIONAL SOMEBODY DYES ARE THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,524,000 54 FOR PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 21st 2019. OPTIONS? 67 TO SEPTEMBER 24th, 2019. ITEM NUMBER 60 IS TO EJECT ALL PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE PROPOSALS RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SANTA AND TERMINATE THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL’S PROCESS. WE HAVE REQUEST FROM SUPERVISORRERMAN TO DELETE ITEM 75A. 75A IS SUPERVISOR WATT WASSERMAN NOMINATES AH INDIVIDUAL TO BE IDENTIFIED FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE SAN MARTIN PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEAT NUMBER 5. WE HAVE REQUEST FROM SUPERVISOR TO HOLD ITEM 800 EPTEMBER 24, 2019. RELATING TO HIGH SPEED RAIL AND ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE OR HIGH SPEED RAIL ALIGNMENT IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY FOR CONFORMANCE WITH BOARD OF SPEARERRIST A HE RECOMMENDATION HOLD ITEMS 86 AND 87 TO SEPTEMBER 24th, 2019, AND LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH ELIZABETH BISHOP AND INDIVIDUAL DOING OF THE ALCOHOL ERKS AMOM NIS RELATED TO COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 231 GRANT AVENUE PALO ALTO NOT TO EXCEED $6,000 FOR A PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 10th, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 AND ITEM NUMBER 7 IS TO APPROVE LESS AGREEMENT WITH STANFORD RENTAL OF SIX PARKING STALLS LOCATE AT 231 GRANT AVENUE PALO ALTO FOR AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $69 FOR PERIOD JULY FIRST, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30th, 2024 AND THIS>>RESIST TEMPERATURE IS SAY DUE ALL RIGHT. LONGEST LIST OF REVISIONS I CAN RECALL IN RECENT MEMORY. SO DOW WANT TO BE SLOW, STEADY, METHODICAL ABOUT WHAT WE MAKE PLEASE TAKE YOUR TIME AND LET ME BEGAN BY ASKING ANY REQUESTED CHANGES OR AMENDMENTS FROM SUPERVISOR ELLENBRG AND WORK OR WAY DONE THE AISLE. MISS ELLENBURG.>>NO CHANGES. ON THIEF ITEMS. BEING MOVED TO CONSENT BUT WITH REGARD TO NUMBER 26. MY CONCERN THAT IS THERE IS NO WAY TO TELL HOW LONG A PROJECT TO REQUEST OFF AGAIN ARE REPORT HAS BEEN ON THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE LIST. WITH REGARD TO ITEM 28, I THINK CONTRACT BUT I WANT TO REQUEST A REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD ON THE OVERALL PICTURE OF CONTRACT SWA INCREASES IN CONTRACT COMPLETION TIMES. IDENTIFY ANY OH POTENTIAL SYSTEMIC PROBLEM OR PARTMENTS PARTICULAR CONTRACTORS? FINALLY I BETWEEN EXPRESS SUPPORT AND ALL CHILDREN DID HE INCLUSION IS ONE THAT WE SHOULD ACROSS ALL ASPECTS OF OUR COMMUNITIES. LIGHTING EXPERIENCES REMAINED NEIGHBORHOODS AND DON’T REQUIRE A COST OF ADMISSION. AM PROUD TO WORK WITH MY WORK MY COLLEAGUES HAVE DONE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CREATES DELIVERS ON THIS ACCENT AND I AM PARTICULARLY PLEASED TO SEE PROGRAM, OUR LOCAL INSTITUTIONS LIKE THE SAN LO ICA ARE CREE WELCOME BUSTLE BRATES THE LBGT YOUTH IN OUR COME TINS.>>THANK YOU.>>YES, ONE CLARIFICATION. IT IS STILL SET TO BE HEARD AS DISCUSSION. SEE YOU NODDING. THANK THERE IS SO MUCH HERE. DIDN’T GET ADD THAT I WAS NOT AWARE OF. ASKING US TO HOLD. WILL ASK THAT WE ACTUALLY DISCUSS THAT ITEM. THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONSENT ITEM I SUPPOSE. IN ANY IS YOUR LIKE TO DISCUSS MENT. DATE UNC NUMBER 35.>>GOT IT. OK. THAT IS ONE. ITEM NUMBER 7 I NEED TO RECUSE MYSELF. RECUSE MYSELF BECAUSE I HAVE FINANCIAL INTEREST RESULTING FROM OWNERSHIP OF STOCK AND IBM.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. VISE C THANK YOU. YOUR WORK. ON ITEM 23 AND 24, FLEECE ITEMS PUT ON CONSENT. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR IS THAT WE GET A QUARTERLY REPORT ADDITION I WOULD LIKE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND WHAT PARENTING CLASSES ARE CURRENTLY BEING CONE GUIDING THE REHAB OFFICERS AND REHAB OFFICER WORK WILL BE INTEGRATED IN A THE FIRST FIVE OR BE SEPARATE. AM EXCITED THAT WE ARE ALSO GOING TO BE INCLUDING CHILD CARE AND PARENTING CLASSES AT RETRIN. ON ITEMS 31, I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE OUT THE CONSENT ANDY VERSION ITEM 33 AND LIKE TO TAKE>>ITEMS 31 AND 33?>>CORRECT. REPORTING. AND THEN, LET THE JUST LOOK REAN ITEM 28 AND THIS S THE STAFF WORK AREA MODIFICATIONS I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE UNDERBID, THE — INTERRUPTION. HAVE MADE REFERENCE TO ITEM 28 THE REGULAR AGENDA IN ANY EVENT.>>GREAT. THEN ITEM 38, THIS IS THE LOAN REPAYMENT FOR CONTINUED POOL. THE LOAN REPAYMENT FOR HOUSING THE STAFF TRAGEDY IN A JUST WANTED TO — I WANT TO LEAVE THAT ON CONSENT, BUT I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT MY UNDERSTANDING FROM US TAKING THIS ACTION, WE WOULD BE FOLK SICK REPAYMENT MONEY ON HOUSING. SHOULD SAY SO NOW AND WE COULD IF NOT, WILL LEAVE IT ON CONSENT.>>IF THAT’S THE YES OR NO STANDING, I WILL ASK IT COME OFF CONSENT. JUST HIGHLIGHT OUR PARTNERSHIP WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY WHAT IS CREATE AN ANNUAL MECHANISM AS PART OF THE REPORTING THAT YOU ARE DOING AROUND OUR NEW HOUSING PROJECTS TO BETTER KNOW IN ADVANCE WHAT THE PROJECT BASED VOUCHERS ARE THAT WILL BE HOUSING AUTHOR SPECIAL IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE WORK ARE LOT OF REALLY GOOD WORK BEING DONE BUT IT IS SPLIT UP THE WAIT IS REPORTED IN SO MANY CHUNKS IT IS HARD TO KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE AND IT THINK IT IS VERY, DIRECTION WANT IT TO BE ABLE TO THEN ON ITEMS 36 AND 37. THESE ARE THE TWO SALES TAX RESOLUTION AND THE SALES TAX WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THIS BE DELETED. IS WHEN WE TOOK THIS VOTE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, WE HAD THREE VOTES, IT TAKES FOUR VOTES TO PUT THIS ON THE BALLOT IN ANY CASE. 36 AND 3>>HE IS CUSHION THE SOME DELETED IN THE ABSENCE OF OBJECTION.>>I THINK FLOWS ALL OF THE QUESTS AND CHANGES. COLLEAGUES. ITEMS 28 38, 28 MEANING THE HOMEWOOD MAIN JAIL IN ELMWOOD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, AND 38, BEING THE OFFICES OF HOUSING. BOTH OF THOSE ITEMS WERE REFERENCED BY COLLEAGUES. CONVERSATION HERE AT THE BARD SO THAT BOTH ITEMS REMAIN ON OUR>>CHEEKS.>>>>WAS THERE A HOLD? HANG ON.>>WHAT THAT IS WHAT I WROTE>>WE HAVE A LONG LIST AND TAKE THROUGH IT. ELLENBERG REFERENCED BRIEFLY IN SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ MENTIONED IN HER REMARK AND SAID SHE PLANT I SAID I PLAN TO PULL THE ITEM FROM CONSENT ANYWAY SO WE CAN HEAR IT TODAY. SO RATHER THAN HAVE THE ITEM REMIN ON CONSENT, I WILL ASK THAT WE HEAR IT IN REGULAR AGAIN. CHAVEZ, BELIEVE, INDICATED SHE UNDERSTANDING AS HO TO YOU THE FUNDS WOULD OR WOULDN’T BE USED BUT THAT WAS INCONSISTENT WITH MY UNDERSTANDING SO I SAID, WELL, LET’S HAR THE ITEM TODAY. AND FIGURE OUT WHAT STAFF IS IN TENNING AND ALSO WHAT THE POURED B’S POLICY DIRECTION IF THERE IS TODAY. THOSE TWOTIMES. TO SPEAKERS. WASSERMAN HANES INDICATED HE SUPE VEER IS OR CHAVEZ YOU ASKED FOR QUARTERLY REPORT BACK N ITEMS 23 AND 24 IF I UNDERSTOOD CHANCE TO ASK THAT IS REPORT THROUGH THE COCOMMITTEE? HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO FLAME FULL BOARD AND THE MAIN REASON I WANT TO GET IT TO THE FULL BOARD IS THERE IS A LOT OF INTEREST IN PARENTING CLASSES AND CHILD CARE AND SO WE OUGHT TO BRING IT BACK HERE. FORMAL REPORT TO AND THROUGH THE BOARD ON REGULAR AGAIN OR CONSENT DEPENDING IN THE NATURE OF REFERRALSP THEN I FURTHER HAVE REQUEST FROM SUPER VASOR CHAVEZ, I BELIEVE, TO KEEP ITEMS 31 AND 336 ON THE AGAIN. TODAY. SUPERVISOR TO HEAR ITEM NUMBER 4 RATHER THAN HOLD IT. SUPERVISOR, DO I HAVE THAT AND I HAVE THE SAME UNDERSTANDING ONCE WE WRAP HERE?>>GOOD. 27, THIS IS THE HOMEWOOD, ANYWAY, WHAT I WANTED TO MAKE SURE OF IS THAT WE COULD GET AND MAYBE THIS WOULD DO GO THROUGH MAKING SURE WE HAVE ENOUGH ARE MAKING MORE CHANGES TO THE SERVICE THAT ARE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE SMOP.>>THANKS. SUPERVISOR I SEE YOUR LIGHT IS YOUR TODAY, DEPENDING OF COURSE ON HOW MANY A HAVE BEEN PUT BACK ON DISCUSSION AT A TIME CERTAIN IS WHAT I WOULD ASK BE ANNOUNCED TO CALL FOR 15 TO 20 MINUTE RECESS THERE. I THINK MOST OF THE PUBLIC AT THIS POINT KNOWS THAT WE HAVE SPEAKERS ALL OVER THIS PLACE HERE. WE TRY TO GET UP TO RECESS ON INDIVIDUAL BASIS IT IS RISKY TO MISS AN ITEM YOU PULLED AND YOU ON. TO 15 MI AT 12:15 AND RETURNING BACK TO THE CHAMBERS AT 1 2:30 AND OBVIOUSLY FINISH WHATEVER ITEM HE WE’RE ON AT THAT TIME. SO WE DON’T BREAK INTO THE ABOUT 12:15. AND LET ME GO THEN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO SUBMITTED CARS ON CONSENT CALENDAR. HANSEN, CAROL GARVEY, PA MELISSA, DONALD WALLIC, JUAN VILLAVERDE AND CASTRO.>>THANK YOU. ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR A LOT OF TIMES WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, HE SAID HE WAS TALKING ABOUT. CLASSES AND YOU GUYS KNOW I TALK ABOUT AN AWFUL LOT. I SEE YOU KNOW LIKE THINGS ABOUT THE RAM, THINGS ABOUT ELMWOOD, THERE’S THINGS ABOUT PARENTING PROGRAMS IN THE REIN TRY CENTER IN A SEE ALL OF THAT. BUT IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY YOU HOPE TO SEE YOUR CHILD. WHAT WE OFFER AT THE COURTHOUSE RIGHT NOW IS ONE HOUR A WEEK. S THERE NOW 60 PEOPLE. CHOICES FOR CHILDREN. 100 THOUSAND GRANT. CATHOLIC CHARITY SERVICE AND IT WAS DEFUNDED WE KNOW IT US ALL ABOUT MONEY. CATH RICK CHARITY SERVICES FOR THREE MONTHS. IT WAS WITH A THERAPIST, IT WAS, YOU OH, MULTIPLE HOURS PER WEEK, SETUP. WE GOT THE PLAY ON THE LAWN, POUND TAIN, BLOW BUBBLE AND REALLY HAVE THAT BONDING EXPERIENCE. HAS BEEN — IT IS NO AT PLEASANT EXPERIENCE. AND HUGS ME AND GET HER IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM THERE. WITH THEIR CHILD ONE HOUR A WHY DO WE HAVE TO BREAK THE LAW WHY? I WOULD BE BETTER OFF TO FIGURE HAVE VISITATION. WHY ARE PEOPLE NOT LOOK MOOING THIS? COURTHOUSE.>>MR. MANSON, YOU ARE UP NEXT, SIR.>>GOOD MORNING, VIPERSOR. I AM RON HANSON. CHAIR OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION AND SPEAKING ON THE BEHALF AND THE COMMISSION’S COMMITTEE. ITEM NUMBER 7. THE COMMISSION’S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDE PERIODICALLY VISITING AND INSPECTING THE RATE TO PROGRAMS AND THE FACILITIES MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE YOUTH LOCATED. ONGOING URGENT CONCERN TO THE COMMISSION NES HAS BEEN THE DLLY IDOL THE STAFF CONTINUED TO STRIFE TO MAKE IT WORK AND INDEED AM IMPLEMENTING PLAN FARCE PROGRAM OF STAFF ANSWERSMENTS PREDICATED ON A CONTINUING RESINS. IN A DIGS THE PURSUIT AND RECEIPT OF LICENSING AT THAT ALLOWS FOR FIVE DAY DAYS AT THE FACILITY RECOGNIZES TODAY’S REALITY OF YOUTH PLACEMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE ACTIONS AND FURTHER ENHANCEMENT PLANS. THE COMMISSION MESS WAS SURPRISED LAST WEAK TO LEARN OF THE EVICTION OF THE RATE. THIS ACTION ONLY SEVERED TO MAGNIFY THE KAY TOAST THIS IS SURROUND BOOED FOR THE PAST RELOW KAIG THE TRITE A SITE FAR THO THE NEEDS OF THOSE YOUTH HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED DEVELOPED OR LICENSERRED AND WE URGE THE BOARD AND THE ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE FACILITY ON THE COURSE WHICH WILL PROVIDE THE BEST LONG-TERM STABILITY FOR THE PROGRAMS AND FOR THE STAFF, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY FOR THE YOUTH. WHO FOR THEIR OWN WELL-BEING THE RATE.>>THANKS. I WANT TO INDICATE, WE HAVE SOME SPEAKERS INCLUDING MR. HAN SEWN WHO JUST SPOKE COMING UP WHO MAY WISH TO SPECK TO ITEMS THAT ARE TH AND SO IT NICE INTERPRETATION AND RULING THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE TO WELL COL THOSE SPEAKERS FOR WORD AT THIS TIME I WITHINNED TO CLARIFY WHY WE ARE HAVING TESTIMONY ON ITEMS THAT WERE HELD OR MOVED. WELCOME. I AM HERE TO SPEAK ON THE SALES TAX MEASURE THAT IS DATA DEAD IN NO ONE LIKES SALE TAXES BUT THE NEED IS THE RESULT OF 40 PLUS YEARS OF PROP 13. I JUST BEGAN THE CAREER WITH THE COUNTY IN 1978, THE YEAR PROP 13 IN THE WATER THEN. BUT YOU STAN ON THE SHOULDERS OF GIANTS, FOLKS LIKE DAN, SUSY WILSON, BECKY MORGAN, ROD JR., JIM BELL TO NAME A FEW. THE YEARS EVEN WITH SHRINKING COVERS TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY AND PAY DECENT WAGES FOR THE WORKERS. HE WORKED FROM SACRAMENTO WINCE FUNDS TO THE COUNTY. I WANT TO THANK THE SUPERVISORS CINDY CHAVEZ AND DAN WHO AND I THINK IT IS IN THEIR DNA AND I ALSO WANT TO RECOGNIZE AND THANK SUPERVISOR ELLENBURG WHO RECOGNIZES THE NEED FOR THE HAVE HELPED THE COUNTY’S WOMEN THE YOU ARE GONE NEEDS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, CHILE CARE AND HEALTH CARE WON’T GO AWAY. I AM HOPEFUL YOU WILL CONTINUE TO WORK TO FIND CREATIVE IN LO VATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR THESE>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GOOD JOSE OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS I HEARD THE STORIES OF SANTA CLARA DENTS AND HEARD OUR COME TIN AND THE FAMILIES END THOSE COME IN CHILD CARE AND HEALTH CARE. TO GIVE THANK YOU TO THOSE ON RESIDENTS DECIDE IF THEY WANT TO INVEST IN THEIR COME-AND ADDRESS THE CRISIS TREK PERIENCING AND RESIDENTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO VET THIS IS OUR COUNTY.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>YOU MUST SUPPORT THE MEASURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES TO THE SALES TAX WE HEAD THE MACHINE MY FOR MANY COMMUNITY NEEDS. I WORK AS IN-HOME SUPPORT SERVICE PROVEERED AND ONLY PAID $14 AN HOUR AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO LIVE ON SUCH LOW WAGES I HAVE TO WORK FIVE THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH PROVIDERS PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR SERVICE PROVIDER FORCE MONTHS SYSTEM OVER THREE MONTHS. IT IS A NECESSITY. WITH THE LIKELIHOOD OF GOOGLE NOT CAMPUS PROPERTY TAXES ARE GOING TO SKYROCKET AND OUR RENS ARE GOING TO SKYROCKET. RENT THAN I PAY. $1,000 A MONTH UTILITIES NOT INCLUDED. AND MANY OF US N-HOME SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS WILL ARE TO MOVE AWAY. I WILL NOT AND CANNOT DRIVE TWO IT WILL ALSO ABHORRABLE DAMAGE TO THE ENVIRONMENT TO DO SO S HOMEPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS SAN JOSE. MEASURE. SYSTEM IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY IS HORRENDOUS. EACH AND EVERY PERSON. THAN>>AND OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS VAUGHN.>>GOOD MORNING. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, MY NAME IS VON VAL LE VERDES. I AM SPEAKING IN SUPPORT OF THE FIVE CEN REVENUE MEASURE ANDS DID PINTED THE BOARD HAS DECIDED NOT GIVE THE VOTERS THE DOESN’T OUR COMMUNITIES BUT OVER THE COMMUNITY FORUMS WHERE WE HEARD NEED FOR MORE RESOURCE FOR HEALTH CARE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND AFFORDABLE WE CLOAKED OVER 500 SIGNATURES TIME TO ADJUST THEM AS COMMUNITY. SIGNATURES FROM YOU AND MAKE>>MR. CASS VO. BRIN CONTINUE OSLY STRUGGLE TO MAKE DIFFICULT DECISIONS BETWEEN PAY FOR THE RENT, MEDICAL EXPENSES OSH WHETHER THEY PROVIDE CARE FOR THE CONCERN AND THAT THUS SPEAKING SUPPORT OF THIS REVENUE SALES TAX. WE STAND WITH OUR PARTNERS IN THE MISSION. PRONUNNATION OF THE FIRST NAME WHICH I AM GUESSING IS SOMETHING WHOLE LIFE.>>YES. WE A THE NINE COUNTY BAY AREA ACCEPTING THE BIGGEST MAKING GOOD QUALITY OF LIFE. THINK STABLE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND AS WE ALL KNOW, THE RESOURCES, THE IF YOU FOR THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS NOTIFY NIGHT SO WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WERE EXCITED TO SEE SOME LEGISLATURE WITH SP5 AND WE KNOW THE RIGHT DIRECTION. BUT AT LEAST THE DEMONSTRATION AGAIN FROM THE CAPITAL TO PROVIDE SOME OF THOSE FUNDING FOR THOSE IN NEED AND I DO APPRECIATE SOME OF THE CONCERNS IS NOT NECESSARILY FOR THOSE THE LOWEST INCOME BUT THE LOCAL ENTITIES WITH THEIR PLAN COULD EXTREMELY LOW INCOME HOUSING. AND THE FACT THAT 50% WOULD BE FLEXIBLE FUNDANCE NOT JUST AGAIN FOR AFOABLE HOUSING I AND HEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPER THIS IS IS HELPFUL TO USE AND FOR IN TRACK TO TURE IMPROVEMENTANCE USE FOR THOSE BE HELPFUL IN THE LONG RUN FOR DELIVERING MORE AFFORDABLE COUNCIL IS IN SUPPORT OF SP5.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. TWO MORE CARDS. FOLK, LAST CALL ON CARDS. PLEASE COME FORWARD.>>GOOD MORNING. TIME IN IS W AND WILL INTERPRET FOR JOSE. IMPLEMENTED ON TIME FOR TWO MINUTES IT WILL BE FOUR MINUTES [SPE>>Translator: HELLO, I AM A HERE FOR 35 YEARS NOW IN A AM A FAST-FOOD WORKER AND I AM IN REPRESENTATION OF THE FAST-FOOD WORKERS THAT ARE ORGANIZING HERE IN THE COUNTY. [SPEAKING IN NATIVE TONGUE]>>YEAR IN THES I HAVE NOTICED A GROWING HOMELESSNESS PROBLEM. MORE PEOPLE, MORE COWORKERS I HAVE SEEN SLEEPING IN THE CARS FARMLY MEMBERS. [SPEAKING IN NATIVE TONGUE]>>Translator: I HAVE NOTICED IT HAS CRE ACED A PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERN FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE STAYING IN THEIR CAR AND FAMILIES AND CHILDREN THAT LIVE IN THE STREETS. [SPEAKING IN NATIVE TONGUE]>>Translator: SO WE ASKING THE CONSENT AGENDA TODAY TO INCREASE FUNDS FOR HOUSING AND FOR THE SOCIAL SERVICES THAT PEOPLE THANK >>FORGIVE ME. SPEAKER. [SPE>>Translator: HI MY NAME IS REPRESENTATION OF ALL FAST-FOOD I, LIKE MANY OF MY COWORKERS, EXPERIENCE LOW WAGES, LOW WAGES THAT CAN’T PAY FOR RENT INCREASES, HEALTH CIR AND THE RISING COST OF CHILD CARE. SOON WE’RE HERE TO ASK PANEDTITION THIS BOARD TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS.>>Translator: AND I ASK THIS SHORE YOUS THAT WE HAVE OUTLINED AS MY COWORKER BEFORE OUTLINED AND HOMELESSNESS IS A SERIOUS ISSUE THAT A LOT OF FAST-FOOD WORKERS ARE FACING. AND SO WE ARE ASKING THAT THIS THAT ARE OF GREAT YOU ARE BEEN SY. INCLUDING THE MORE FUND FORCE SOCIAL SERVICES THAT PEOPLE CONTINUOUSLY RELAY ON TO MAKE r: AND LASTLY I HAVE SEEN A DECREASE IN THE STANDARD OF LIVING FOR WORKERS IN MY INCREASINGLY HARDER TO AVOID THE THINGS NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE JOSE. ACTION ON THIS. MADA CONFIRM HAVE ANOTHER OTHER SPEAKERS. COMING DONE THE ROW. ALL RIGHT. ITEM 44. NO VET ON ITEM 44. ALL RIGHT. PANEL BE DES PLIED ON THE SCREEN SO WE CAN TAKE ACTION ON THAT LONG LIST. CALENDAR AS AMENDED M WE DO SUPERVISOR ELLENBRG. WE HAVE A SECOND? MACHINE AND PLEASE VET ON THE CLERG TO DISPLAY THE RESULTS AND INDICATE THE MOTION CAR IS ARE AND AMENDED CONSENT CALENDARS APPROVED ON 5-0 VOTE. MADAM CLERK YOU HAVE THE REVISED I THAN ITEM NUMBER 8 WHICH IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORM AND EVALUATION REPORT. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT. AGAIN. ASKING THE DEPARTMENT STAFF TO OFFER A VERBAL REPORT IF THEY WOULD LIKE SUM THROUGH ITEM AND DR. SMITH, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SUPPORT HOUSING HERE WITH HERNANDEZ, HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER. THE COUNTIES RECIPIENT FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FUNDS EACH YEAR WE MUST BE REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES FUNDED BY AT LEAST TWO FUNDING SERVICES BY SEPTEMBER 30th AND THEN THE THE FISCAL YEAR 2019 ACTIVITIES. THANK YOU. AND I WITH ASK IF THERE ARE ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FOR FROM STAFF AT THIS POINT. ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC HEARING. OPEN AND ASK THE CLERK WE HAVE ANY CARDERS SPEAKERS WHO WOULD SHE INDICATES WE DO NOT. WITHOUT OBJECTION HEARING NONE WE’LL NOT CLOSE THE PUBLIC FOR DISCUSSION DELIBERATION. AND THE ABSENCE OF ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS WE’LL ASK THE CLERK PO APPROVE FROM SUPERVISOR WE HAVE SECOND FROM SUPERVISOR AND WE WILL ASK ALL FIVE MEMBERS FIVE VOTES HAVING BEEN CASSES. WE’LL POLICE DID OVER THE HEAD. PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY SAN JOSE. VERBAL REPORT SUMMARIZING THE AGENDA ITEM AND THE DEPARTMENT’S THIS IS ITEM RELATED TO THE APARTMENTS AIN’T IS A NEW PARENTS. HOUSING FOR CHRONICALLY HOMELESS INDIVIDUALORS FAMILIES AND THE OF 28-17 AND $4.26 MILLION WOULD BE USED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW OF OCTOBER.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>ARE THERE ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS HEARING? HEARING ON ITEM NUMBER 9 AND ASK THE CLERK WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS WITHOUT ONJECTION HEARING NONE I AND WE WILL SEE IF THERE ARE DELIBERATION. ASK THE CLOS DISPLAY ON THE SCREENS. OVERHEAD. AGAIN, THAT IS 5-0 ON ITEM NUMBER NINE AND TAKE US TO ITEM NUMBER TEN. LOCATED AT 2004 CORVIN DRIVE SANTA CLARA HERE AGAIN WE ASK THE STAFF THEY HAVE A PUBLIC REPORT OR VERBAL STAFF REPORT LOOKING TO YOU. APARTMENTS IN SANTA CLARA. APARTMENTS. 80 OF WILL BE USED AS PEPPER NEN THE BOARD PREVIOUSLY OH ALLOCATED UP TO $29 MILLION IN 2016 FUND MOTHERS DEVELOPMENT. USED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE LAN WHICH WILL BE GROUND TO THE CONSTRUCTION EN NOVEMBER.>>THANKS VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS APPARENTLY NOT. LET ME ASK THE CLERK AS I ANNOUNCE I AM OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM NUMBER TEN. LET ME ASK THE CLERK DO VANE SPEAKERS. IF THERE IS ANY DEBATE OR DELIB ANY COME MENNORS QUESTIONS? IN THE A A SENSE OF COMMENTS ARE THE MEMBERS HEF BOARD AND READY WHICH ASK THE VOTING PANEL BE DID DISPLAYED ON THE SCREEN AND RECOMMENDATION. SUPERVISOR CORE TA SY AND A STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON ITEM NUMBER TEN AND ASK ALL FILE ITEM12 HAS BEEN HELD. AND THAT TAKES US HEN TO ITEM NUMBER 13. REFERRALS COLLEAGUES THIS IS REFERRAL FROM ME AND MY OFFICE AND IT IS SIMPLY TO PROVIDE DIRECTION TO THE ADMINISTRATION REGULAR PROGRESS REPORTS TO THE BOARD REGARDING EFFORTS TO INTEGRITY OF THE ELECTIONS HERE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY. SOME OF YOU WILL RECALL THAT FRYER THE 2018 ELECTIONS, FGOC SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ AND I SPEND MONTH AFTER MONTH WORKING WITH OUR STAFF TO UP OUR GAME IN TERMS OF ELECTION SECURITY MATTERS THE REASONS FOR THAT ARE REPEATED. IN EARLIER AS WELL THE ISSUE OF ELECTION SECURITY WITHOUT SHARING TOUCH, AND THAT IS A CHALLENGE, IN THESE CONVERSATIONS, HOW TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE NOT SHARING FOLKS TO COMPROMISE THE SYSTEM WITHOUT SHARING TO MUCH, FILE LIKE WE MADE SUBSTANTIAL ROG LEARNED ANN THING, OUR WORK IS AND THAT THE THREAD NEVER ABATES. GOOD WORK THROUGHOUT THE MORE SECURE PLACE AND SOME OF YOU KNOW, SOME OF YOU WERE ABLE CONFERENCE THAT MAY OFFICE AND I SPONSORED ABOUT 120 FOLKS AROUND THE STAT AND INDEED SOME FROM ELECTION SECURITY MATTERS AND TRYING TO IDENTIFY BEST COUNTIES. MOTION. SECURI MATTERS OF NATIONAL OR STATE INTERESTS IN IMPORTANCE AND WHAT IS OFTEN THERE ARE 3,000 COUNTIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND SOME JURISDICTION AND THE VOTES GETCOW COUNTED AND THEY COUNTY LEVEL AND THEN, THAT IS WHY I THINK IT IS SO IMPORTANT THAT WE FOCUS OUR EFFORTS HERE PARTICULARLY AS WE ARE JUST A PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY HERE IN SO, IF I COULD THE SCREEN TO POP I WILL MAKE THE MOTION AND I THINK WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS ASK THAT WE GET REGULAR PROGRESS REPORTS TO THE BOARD REGARDING EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE IN TEG I COUNTY AND IF WE COULD GET THOSE ACTUALLY AS AGAIN ITEMS TO SIMPLY RECEIVE THE REPORT, DR. SMITH, EVEN IF THEY END UP THER NEWS TO CHAIR INCREMENTALLY FROM THAT FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE BUY WHICH I MEAN THROUGH THE END OF THE 2020 ELECTION CYCLE WE THERE IS A SECOND. CORTESE ANN ASK ALL MEMBERS TO I BELIEVE ARE NONE. THE ITEM BE DISPLAYED. THAT IS I AM A.M. NUMBER 13 NUMBER 14. FAMILIAR WITH HAPPY HOLLOW AND THE OPERATIONS THAN THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE SERVED THE SEN STIFF SAN JOSE LEVEL SO PROVADE LITTLE BIT ACKNOWLEDGE MY NEED FOR A LITTLE>>CAN I CALL THAT PART OF OHSAL DUTIES? THIS FORWARD TO MY COLLEAGUES IS CHILDREN’S ZOO IN JUST OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE. AND THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING REALLY CLOSELY WITH THE COMMUNITY TO TRY TO RESTRICT TURE THEIR PREP IN THE COMMUNITY. ECONOMICALLY DEPRESSED, BUT MANY, MANY, MANY OF THE VISITORS COME FROM ALL OVER THIS COUNTY, AND BUT WHAT THEY FOUND IS CHILDREN WHO LIVE NEARBY WERE RAISING TO MAKE SURE THAT TITLE 1 SCHOOLS ARE ABLE TO PHYSICALLY COME TO THE SITE AND FRYER THAT, WHAT THEY HAVE DONE, THEY HAVE TAKEN SOME OF THAT, THE SMALLER ANIMAL AND SOME OF THECATION TOO VEER SO NOW THEY ARE CREATING ACCESS PROGRAM FOR THEIR SITE. AS PART OF THAT, THEY ARE FACILITIES AND ADDING ACILITIES TO MAKE IT MORE EASY FOR CHILDREN OF ALL CAPACITIES AND SENIORS TO BE ABLE TO SERVICES AND ACTUAL LAY PRETTY WELL DEA SIGN NOW. BUT WHAT I WAS INTERESTED IN WAS TAKING SOME, A SMALL PORTION OF THE $1 MILLION THAT WE HAVE BUDGETED FOR MY DISSTRIB FOR ALL PROGRAM AND OFF $335,000. IF YOU DON’T MINE I WILL ASK SOME QUESTIONS THEN WHICH WILL>>SUPERVISOR. HOLLOW IS A CITY PARK?>>YES.>>AND IT IS THEN SUPPORTED BY SEPARATE 501C3 FOUNDATION.>>THAT IS CORRECT. UNDERSTANDING I WANTED TO GET. AND THEN, FOR JEFF ME, MY MEMORY FUBBING . WITH AS THERE $1 MILLION LEFT UNSPENT IN DISTRICT 2?>>THAT IS CORRECT.>>THAT IS THE CIRCUMSTANCE INTO APPLICANT WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SECOND ROUND CHARGING OF FEES FOR ACCESS TO OTHER THEY DID NOT ATTEND A WORKSHOP AND PART OF THE REASON AND I ACTUALLY FEEL LIKE THIS IS A MISTAKE, I MADE. TUR AND THAT IS WHAT PROMPTED IT. WERE RUSHING TO TRY AND PUT THAT SECOND ROUND OUT BEFORE OUR COLLEAGUES SUPERVISOR JAGR LEFT THE OTHER AND THIS MEANT THE PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO ARTICIPATE IN THE SECOND REASONED AND DID NA THE PARKSLE FOCS WOULD MAKE AVAILABLE TO OTHER THIS THE ZAN.>>YES. THE CITY OF SAN JOSE TO DO A MONEY IN THE PARK AREA WHICH IS ALSO A COMMUNITY. BETWEE$1 MILLION AND $35,000. SO IS THE APPLICATION THAT WE’RE ANTICIPATING FOR $35,000? AND IS THE ACTION YOU ARE REQUESTING TODAY IN YOUR MEMO, A WAVER OF THE RULE SO THEY ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TODAY?>>WELL, ACTUALLY, THAT IS GREAT I WANTED APPROVE THE FUNDS IN PART BECAUSE OF TIMING TUNES RELATIVE TO HAPPY HOLLOW BEING ABLE TO MOVE RELATIVELY CORRECT QUICKLY. ACTUALLY RUN BY FOUNDATION WHICH IS WHY WE WOULD MAKE FRONT THE>>GOT IT. ACCURATE. HISTORY MUSEUM AND PALO ALTO IS ON CITY LAND THAT AS IT THE TECHNICALLY PARK LAND AND SO YOU GET THE SAME KIND OF, WELL, OK HOW DOES IT MATTER? SO ON AND SO FORTH. WILL GO TO MR. WASSERMAN AND POLICE ELLENBERG.>>THANKS. DISTRICT FACED SIMILAR ISSUES IN GETTING APPLICANTS THAT FELT IT REQUIRE PRESIDENTS WITH THAT I PROG AIPG GRANT APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS. NUMBER TWO, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK STAFF TO AMEN THE SPREAD CALL TO RAL GUIDE ELIMINATE OR THE RE ACCUMULATED DAYS REQUIREMENT AND WAVE THE REQUIREMENT TO TAIN THE TECHNICAL WORKSHOP IF HEY HADTAINED ONE IN THE PREVIOUS I HAD PEOPLE WHOTAINED IN HE THAT UNDERSTANDING. AND THIS INTERESTED APPLI CANS WHO DID NOT APLAY BECAUSE THEY FELT THEY DO NOT MEET THE EXTENSION IS FOR. SEE THE FUNDS USED. SUPERVISOR ELLEN.>>THANK YOU. AM HUGE FAN OF HAPPY HOLLOW PARK SON’S FIRST YEARS OF LIFE THERE AND AND STILL ENJOY VISITING WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND ASSET. HETIVE OF ALL OF YOUR COMMITMENT TO ALL INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUNDS AND I WAS PART OF THE ROTARY PLAYGROUND, PLAY GROUND PROJECT WHICH WELCOMED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF VITTORS TO THE FULLY ACCESSIBILITY FEATURE AND ATTRACTIONANCE BELIEVES THE BAYPLAY GARDEN THAT STIMULATED SPACES ACROSS THE COON TY AND I AM GLAD WE ARE WORKING ON THAT. AND AS PROBABLY CLEAR TO EVERYONE. AND RESPECTING CLEARLY DIE FINED PROCESSES HELPS US MAKE DECISION IN A FAIR AND TRANSPARENT MANNER AND AVOID PARTIALALITY AND FAVOR RITE TISM IN THE CASE, HAPPY NOT HAVE MET ALL OF THE QAL PICATION NOR GRANT. SO AS AS IPORT THEIR DUSTIERED A REALLY WELL-KNOWN AND BELOVED ORGANIZATION TO WORK AROUND PROCESS TO WHICH DOZENS OF OTHERS WERE EXPECTED TO ADHERE, FEELS UNCOMFORTABLE TO ME. I CERTAINLY DOES SEEM THAT THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MAY HAVE RULED OUT THE PROJECT AND SHOULD HAVE THIRD ROUND OF FUNDING BECOME AVAILABLE I THINK REQUIREMENTS PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THE SUG GEGS THAT SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN JUST MADE. CONTINUE TO SEEK FUNDING SOURCE HOPE THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO COME BACK TO US AGAIN BUT I AM GOING TO ABSTAIN FROM THIS VOTE>>COLLEAGUES, IF I CAN WEIGH IN, PLEASE. SHOUT OUT TO OUR FRIENDS AT MAGICAL BRIDGE. INSTEAD OF BECOMING A ONE OFF AS SOMEBODY PUT IT QUITE ELOQUENTLY, IT WOULD BAM THING. IT DID BECOME A THING. WHICH WAS GOOD AND HEALTHY THING BECAUSE IT MEANT WE HAD ENGAGED THE COMMUNITY AND ONE OF THOSE, THINK, SMALL SUCCESS STORIES WHERE YOU CAN SEE IT WORKED THE IN FACT IT WORKED THE WAY WE HOPED IT WOULD WORK SO WELL THAT WHEN I TOSSED OFF AND COME AC IN A DOWN OF YEARS TOES DO THIS AGAIN THAT IS WHEN SUPER ROSAOR JAGR SAID WHY WE DON’T WE DO IT YOU WEARSMAN HAS THREADED THE NEEDLE QUITE WELL IN MY VIEW. AND HERE IS WHAT I WOULD SAY. I HAVE GOT ON THE ONE HAND REQUEST WE GET SOMEBODY TODAY COLLEAGUE WHO IS SAYING THINK WE HEAD TO RESPECT THE PROCESS AND AM KIND OF WHERE YOU ARE WHICH IS LET’S TRY TO RESPECT THE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ARE GOING ARE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT. SUPERVISOR CORTESE WILL REMEMBER LOOK. I UNDER STAND THE GOAL, FORGIVE WORDS. UNDSTEEREDND THE GOAL WAS TO RAVE THE COUNTY DOLLARS BUT NOT EVERY COME COME TINS WELL THOUGH I TON BELIEVE BELIEVE AND ARE CRITERIA CONTINUE TO REFLECT THE FACT THAT MATCHING FUNDS ARE KEY TO THE SUCCESS OF THE PROGRAM. AM ALSO VUK RYE BOO THE THAT SUPERVISOR WASSER THAN YOUR MOTIONS I THINK HELPFUL IN REGARD TO THE FACT IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY THERE IS STILL $1 MILLION UNALLOCATED COMPETITION AND THE PROCESS. DY SAY SUPER VASOR WATTS. COOKS HE. AND ACCOMMODATE THE UNIQUE CASE AND I WOULD ASK FOR FROM SUPERVISOR WEARSMAN IF I WANTS TO OF FER IT AS MOTION TO SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ THAT IS WE INDICATE CLEARLY THAT THIS CHANGE CRIN TIE IF IT IS OVER 60 GOIN VERSION I AM SORRY FOR FINALLY GETTING IT TO. SHORT VERSION WE GOT $1 MILLION LEFTOVER THE CRITERIA DIDN’T ENGAGEMENT THAT WE HOPE FOR AND SO, IF WE NEED A LITTLE FLEXIBILITY TO ROUND UP FUNDS OPEN WITH THAT. BUT THROUGH CRY YEAR TO. YES?>>IF WE DO THAT, WOULD OTHER ENTITIES HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY?>>YES. SUPERVISOR WEARSLAND TO BE AND WILL BE HER MOTION. I HEARD SUPER ROSAOR WASSERMAN SAYING WHETHER THAN CALLING OUT ANYONE SIN GL LAY, LET’S SIMPLE SAY, HEY, THAT $1 MILLION IS STILL THERE. DISTRICT 2 FOR 60 DAYS FOR THAT REMAINING MILLION THE CRITERIA. IN YOUR MUTH AND SUPERVISOR CHA HAVE’S MOUTH WHICH IS RISKY BUSINESS SO I WILL STOP. THE MOTION WAS TO REOPEN IT. APPLICANTS. APPROPRIATE USE BUT BECAUSE OF PARTICULAR RULING IN PLACE, THAT EXTENSION AND THE ONE CHANGE AS YOU ARE A TICK LATELY SAID.>>YES.>>THANK YOU. EYE LIKE TO AND APPRECIATE IT. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE WE SHOULDN’T LIMIT IT TO DISTRICT 2 AND D1 I ACTUALLY WITH A LIKE FUNDS HAVE BEEN AL LOCATED AND IF THEY HAVE NOT.>>CONDI-WIDE. ACCEPT THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THE ONLY THING THAT I SO, I AM GOING TO READ BACK TO THE RECORD TO APPROVE TENSIONING PROGRAM AND ROUND 2 OF THE GRANT APPLICATION DEAD LISTEN FOR 60 AND THEN, HAVE STAFF AMENDMENT THE DID GUIDELINES TO EALMOST DAYS EQUIREMENT AND WAVE TO YEAR. THAT I THINK THE 65 PERCENT MINIMUM HOURS IS ACCESS. ISSUE? THE ONLY OTHER THING I WANTED TO ASK FOR INCLUSION IS THAT THE STAFF LACK AT ACCESS MORE BROADLY AND, IN PART BECAUSE OF THE LITTLE ORGANIZATIONS MAY CHARGE ON OCCASION AND NOT CHARGE ON OCCASION SO I WANTED THE ACCESS QUESTION AND IFS THAT HE THE CASE THEN I WOULD ACCEPT MOTION. AYOU HAVE STAFF NOW WHERE WE PUT YOURSELF AND GIVES THE TEAM NAME ANNOTATEDLE FOR THE RECORD AND HELPFUL. RECREATION AND HERE TO ANSWER IF THERE IS — THANK FOR THE CLARIFICATION AND WHAT THE TRACK SO IT I COULD ANY ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.>>TWO QUARTERBACKING QUESTIONS THE SECO FIVE DISTRICTS. $2 MILLION IN THE SECOND ROUND DISTRICT 1, 2, 3. THOSE THREE DISTRICTS AND I UNDERSTAND IT IS GENERICALLY APPLY FOG ALL FIVE. BUT AS PRACTICAL MATTER THERE IS LEFTOVER FUNDS WHICH MAY BE ALLOCATED IN THOSE THREE ACCOMMODATION. A AGO THAT YOU COLLEAGUES SCAND ANY MEMBERS ARE HERE TO SPEAK. SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ HAS MADE THE MOTION WHICH INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE SUGGESTIONS FROM SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN WHO SECONDED THE MOMENT AND ASK ALL FIVE MEMBERS TO VOTE ON THE RECEIP PLY DISPLAY THE RESULTS. THE MOTION CARES. THIS IS THE TITLE X REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES. SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ I BELIEVE THIS IS REFERRAL FROM YOU.>>THANK YOU. BACK IN MARCH, I HAD ASKED THE ADMINISTRATION TO ACES THE IMPACT OF THE TRUMP THE TITLE X HEALTH SERVICES FOR AND IN MAY, THE REPORT CAME BACK, THAT 36, OVER 36,000 WOMEN HEALTH SERVICES BEFORE WERE THE CHANGES IN TITLE X. AND SADLY, THAT HAS COME TO WOMEN, BIRTH CONTROL, PREGNANCY TEST, MAMMOGRAM, PAP SMEAR, CANCER SCREENINGS AND IN OUR COMMUNITY, I JUST WANT TO SAY HOW MUCH I APPRECIATE ALREADY GIVEN IN TERMS OF HOW WE ADDRESS IN CONTRAST THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS ACTING CRUELLY AND AT A LOCAL LEVEL WE TRYING COMMUNITY SO MY REFERRAL PROPOSE LOCAL PARTNERS SUCH AS THE CITY THE SERVICES BY FUNDING THE GAP THAT IS IN NEED. FOR WOMEN SIN SANTA CLARA COUNTY THAT AMOUNT OF M IN MY INYEAR IS APPROXIMATELY LAY $463,000. I WOULD LIKE THE STAFF WITH THE REFERRAL ACTION I AM ASKING FOR FROM THE COUNTY BUT LOOK AT SURROUNDING CITIES, TO DETERMINE>>THANKS. SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ. THAT IS FIRST. SUPERVISOR CORTESE AND HEARD THE AND WE SORT HAVE BEEN WAITING AND THINK I THE ACTION IS TIMELY AND IMPORTANT SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. BACK I TH HAVE COMMITTEE DELIBERATION BOARD. AVAILABLE OR THE ACTUAL OTHER RY IN? IT WOULD BE GOOD HAVE LENGTH AT HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SO TH THAT UNDER ONE CONDITION AND THAT IS THAT I THINK FROM DISCUSSING THIS WITH PLANNED PARENTHOOD, THERE IS A BIT OF CONCERN ABOUT CONTINUITY OF SERVICES AND SO WHAT I WOULD ASK CONCUR R SURE THEY ARE NOT WORRIED. SO I THINK THE GREAT TO HAVE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL. LET ME JUST ADD HE WITHIN OTHER REQUEST I WOULD MAKE AND I WOULD WANT YOU BOTH TO GIVE THOUGHT OTHER ISSUE THAT I AM CONCERNED AVAILABILITY OF THE SERVICES AND THAT REMEAN IN THE COUNTY AND YOU KNOW, CLEARLY PLANNED PARENTHOOD WILL HAVE A PLAN FOR THAT BUT WE MAY NEED TO PLY A LEADERSHIP ROLE IN ASSISTING WITH HOW THE COMMUNICATION IN PART BECAUSE WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING IN IS SO SR. FY FAWN GOING TO HAVE A CHANCE TO TALK DISCUSSION ABOUT COMMUNICATION>>GOT IT. YOU ARE LOOK PERPLEXED O I WANT EVERYBODY GETS THE SAME UNDERSTANDING.>>YES. THE WAY THE ADMINISTRATION IS READING THE REFERRAL IS ASKING FOR US TO COME BACK WITH AN A WERE THINKING POSSIBLY THE ENTERPRISE FUND OR THE RESERVE FOR STATE AND REING THE FULL BOARD HAS TO TAKE ACTION BEFORE EVERYBODY CAN TRANSFERRED AND DISPERSED SO I AM WONDERING WHAT THE REFERRAL WILL DO TO THAT PROCESS. WE HAVE TO DEVELOP A CONTRACT AND AL IS GOING TO REVIEW IT BEFORE THAT.>>NO, I THINK WHAT SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ IN A WERE ABLE TO FIND COMMON GROUND ON IS BRING IT TO THIS BOARD. AS QUICK AS YOU CAN. AND IF THERATION LITTLE OVERLAP OR ONE GETS IN FRONT OF THE OTHER. MEMBERS OF THE HEALTH AND THROUGH AT GREATER LENGTH PROVIDING PUBLIC INPUT IF IT IS PORED THE RANGE OF POSSIBILITIES MATTER THOUGH SINCE THE QUESTION GOES DR. SMITH IS ABOUT I THINK WHAT I HEARD HIM SAY. AND PUTTING WORDS IN THE COL LOG’S MOUTH. MONEY. MIGHT ANOTHER REFERRAL IF I HEARD IT RIGHT. TATION ABOUT SORT OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH ABOUT THIS SHUSH AS WELL. THINKING ABOUT THIS IN LET ME MAKE TWO POINTS. UNIS THAT PLANNED PARENTHOOD NEEDS MONEY IMMEDIATELY. MONEY BACK TO THE BOARD, THE AND I AM COMFORTABLE WITH THAT CONCUR IN KENTLY GOING THROUGH WANT IT TO DOM THE BOARD. THINK THAT I IS A FAIR CHARACTERIZATION. THIS IS A ONE-YEAR EMERGENCY AND WHAT WE NEED HAVE A ROSAOR SIMITIAN IS RIGHT THIS BETTERUND STAPEDESSING WHAT THE PARTNERS CAN HELP US FUN IT. TWO REASONS THATEAS IMPORTANT. ONE, COUNCIL MEMBER IS ASKING THE CITY OF SAN JOSE CONTRIBUTE TIMELINE WILL BE LIKE. IF THEY ARE SLOW, I DON’T WANT BUT BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT A ONE-TIME HIT. THIS COULD BE SOMETHING ONGOING. I THINK BETTER UNDERSTANDING WHO OUR FUNDING PARTNERS IS GOING TO BE CRITICAL FOR COUPLE OF WINCE CONTINUE OUT TIN SOURCE OF FUNDS THE OTHER IS MAKING SURE PARENTHOOD IS GOING TO STAY OPEN AND THREE IN THIS MAY ACTUALLY BE ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES THAT IS THE STRATEGIES WE USE AT COUNTY AND REGIONAL LEVEL COULD BE ADOPTED FROM OTHER COUNTIES AND OTHER REGIONS I THINK WE SUPPORT OTHER COUNTIES DOING THE SAME THING.>>THANK YOU. AND HOSPICE KIST SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 25th WHICH IS THE IF YOU KNOW, IF SOMETHING IS THE FULL BOARD, TREAT GREAT THEN FOLLOW UP ON NOT LOWING DAY AND START FROM SCRATCH AND ON THE 25th AND I DON’T THINK IS ANY REASON WHY THAT DATE SHOULD POSE A CONFLICT IN TERMS OF CHAMBERS HERE. 25th SO WE CAN PLAY ROLE AND UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE STAFF TO TARGET THE 24th O DR. SMITH?>>WE WON’T HAVE THE CONTRACT APPR>>GREAT. INTO IT.>>NT. OTHER IMPACTED INSTITUTIONS. THAT IS A GREAT POINT.>>YEAH. OBVIOUSLY, COLLEAGUES WILL KNOW THAT WORKING WITH STAFF FOR THE PARENT REMAINS THE ONLY CLINIC PLANNED PARENTHOOD CLINIC BETWEEN RED WOOD CITY ANSAN JOSE INTERNALS OF SERVING THAT PORTION OF THE POPULATION IT IS IMPORTANT ONE. ALL RIGHT. SUPE VEER OTHER IS CHAVEZ, IT IS HOW AR SUPERVISOR CHAVEZ, THANKS SO MUCH FOR BRI BRINGING THIS REFEL FORWARD. AND WANT TO JUST ASK SOME MORE REALLY DO THIS VERY QUICKLY THINKING BOTH SHORT TERM AND THERE IS NOW FOR THESE DOLLARS SO MY FIRST QUESTION IS DO WE NEED TO DO A STANDARD CONTRACT AS OPPOSED TO PERHAPS MAKING A ONE-TIME GRANT OF THE MONEY AND A STRAIGHTOUT GRANT. SO WE CAN DO THAT QUICKLY AND THEN THE PIECES FOR THE STRATEGICALLY TO THE EVENT HAT THIS IS LONG TERM. PARTNERS FROM THE CITIES WOULD BE WILLING GOING FORWARD AND WHAT ONGOING FUNDING SOURCES AND THEN AGAIN, LOOKING WITH PLANNED PARENTHOOD. DO THAT. THE COUNTY THAT RECEIVED FUNDING OR ONLY IN PLANNED PARENTHOOD ISSUE. TO AND THE FIRST PART OF THE QUESTION, THE BOARD HAS TO DO AND NOW ALLOCATION SO THAT IS THE BOARD ACTION. CONTRACT WHICH IS EVIDENCE OF BOARD CAN DELEGATE THE SIGNING TEF WHICH I WOULD HE IMAGINE YOU WOULD WANT TO DO AND NO I, IT IS YOUR MAIM. IT I IT IS DOCUMENTATION.>>WOULD THAT WORK? CITY OF SAN JOSE IS LOOKING AT, FIRST OF ALL, NO SIN HAVING MORE MONEY. BACK. OUT. SINGLE INFUSION, WE EYE DALLY HAVE A PARTNERSHIP WITH ALL OF WHEN THIS — IF WE COULD THEN, WHEN THE MOTION SCREEN COMES UP, THE MOTION I WOULD MAKE WOULD BE TO RECOMMEND ACTIONS THAT WOULD TO THE FULL BOARD WITH DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY, SO THAT WE CAN MOVE FORWARD QUICKLY. AFTER THE STAFF WOULD COME BACK WITH A SOURCE OF FUNDS AND THEN THAT THIS THEN BE REFERRED ALSO TO THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL COMMITTEE TO LOOK AT, WHATEVER IT DEEMS IMPORTANT, BUT ALSO, LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS IF THERE ARE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE IMPACTED AND ANY KIND OF SUPPORT COMMUNICATION. THANK YOU.>>YEAH. A COUPLE OF THINGS. SANTA CL TITLE X FUNDS BUT WHO ARE NOT ADVERSELY EFFECTED AND THINKING OF THE FUNDS. SNOWS.>>OBRIA. ANYWAY. MAY OR MAY NOT BE AFFECTED BY VIRTUE OF THE RATE IN WHICH THEY DO OR DON’T PROVIDE SERVICES.>>THAT IS EXCELLENT POINT. BUT THEN, THE NEXT THING I THINK WOULD BE IMPORTANT TO ESTABLISH FL OR OTHERS ACTUALLY STOP? SO IF OUR ROLE IS TO STEP IN AND MAKE SYSTEM WHOLE AND WITHOUT A BREAK AND WUT A LOSS OF CONTINUE TUTTI AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS FROM TITLE X PROGRAM RATHER THAN COME PLY WITH RIM ON AUGUST 19th BUY DON’T KNOW FOR SURE THAT THAT IS CORRECT. I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT DOES THAT FUNDING STOP FLOWING. I THINK WE NEED TO KNOW AS WE GO FORWARD AND THEN THE LAST THING TO FACILITATE THIS, HE ROLE OF COURSE IS TO ENSURE THAT WE PRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICE WERE MADE AVAILABLE SO WHILE I THINK WE’RE GOING TO BE FLEXIBLE WE’LL SPECIFIC ABOUT THE FACT THAT SINCE THESE FUNS ARE BEING FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES THAT THAT IS WHAT THE FUNDING WILL BE USED FOR. AS PART OF SOME MONTHS AGO ALL OF US RECEIVED AN E-MAIL THERE. NAACP ASKING US TO DO SOMETHING SIMILAR WHICH WAS TO CREATE A HATE CRIMES TASK FORCE OR WORK GROUP. ONCE THE GILROY SHOOTINGS OCCURRED IT, REMINDED ME THAT SOMETIMES I HAD BEEN THINKING THAT WE WERE IN A VERY SAFE SPACE. AND I DON’T THINK I WOULD FULLY APPRECIATED HAT WE ERE PART OF A VERY ANGRY WORLD WITH EYE VERY ANGRY PRESIDENT THAT’S CREATED AN OVERLAY OF VERY ANGRY PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY. THAT IT HAS ALSO GIVEN RISE TO PEOPLE FEELING MORE COMFORTABLE AND CONFIDENT SPEWING HATE IN OUR COMMUNITY. AND WITH DEAD ANY CONSEQUENCES. SO WHAT I AM ASKING MY COLLEAGUES FOR YOUR SUPPORT ON, IS TO ALLOW THE COUNT TOY CONVENE A REGIONAL HATE CRIMES TASK FOR THAT WILL INCLUDE THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AND OTHER JURISDICTION LIKE THE CITY OF GILROY TO DEVELOP A CLEAR SET OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADDRESS HATE, VIOLENCE INCITED BY OUR HATE SPEECH COMMUNITY. IT WOULD BE A TIME LIMITED WORKING GROUP. SECOND, THAT THE TASK FORCE WILL DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO EMPLOY EXISTING AND STATE AND FEDERAL LAW THAT PROTECT WOMEN FROM HATE CRIMES, BUT ALSO TO ASSESS WHAT NEW POLICIES AND LEGISLATION MAY BE NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THIS AND THE TASK FORCE WILL XAMINE THE PATHOLOGIST OF HATE CRIMES TO DEVELOP BETTER METHODS AND POLICIES TO ADDRESS THEM EARLY ON. THE TASK FORCE WILL DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS ON INNING INVESTMENTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT SPIN TELL GEMS TO COMBAT THE ILLEGAL GUN TRADE AND MONITOR THE P PROLIFERATION OF HATE SPEH AND RECOMMEND SCHOOL-BASED PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE CHANGE IN OUR COMMUNITY. THIS REFERRAL BUILDS UPON THE SISTER REFERRAL PUT FORWARD BY COUNCILMEMBER A SPAR IS, CARRASCO, ARRAIGN AS ND FOLEY IN HE CITY OF SAN JOSE. LET ME ADD ONE OTHER POINT TO THIS. SOMETIME AGO AFTER THE 2016 ELECT, SUPERVISOR CORTESE AND I CO-HOST AID SERIES OF HEARINGS AND ONE OF THOSE WAS ON HATE CRIMES AND IT WAS EALLY CLEAR TO US THAT THERE WERE MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY WHO WERE VERY FEARFUL OF THE CHANGES THAT WERE HAPPENING AND WHAT THEY COULD SEE ON THE HORIZON EVERYBODY THROUGH A TUMULTUOUS ELECTION. I THEREFORE I WANT TODAY BOTH ACKNOWLEDGE AND THANK DAVE FOR HIS VISION AND SEEING THIS AS SOMETHING THAT WE NEEDED TO ADDRESS. AND THEN SK MY COLLEAGUES TO ALLOW US TO WORK WITH STAFF TO CREATE SUCH A TASK FORCE. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FRAMEWORK I AM HAPPY TO RESPOND TO THEM. BUT WANTED TO ALSO GIVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO COUNCILMEMBER A SPAR IS BEFORE SHE HAD TO GO BACK TO HER BOARD MEETING.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE ONE CARD FROM COUNCILMEMBER ASPARSA, AND COUNSEL MEMBERS I WOULD LIKE TO CALL ON HER TO ACCOMMODATE HER. SINCE WE ONLY HAVE THE ONE CARD. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE TODAY.>>THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE. AND AS THE AUTHOR ALONG WITH MY COLLEAGUES COUNCILMEMBER CARRASCO, ARRAIGN AS AND FOLEY WHO ARE ALL FORMER SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS, WE ARE AUTHORS OF THE SISTER PROPOSAL THAT WILL BE HEARD AT THE CITY COUNCIL TO ESTABLISH THE HATE CRIMES TASK FORCE. ON JULY 28TH, MY COUSIN SIX-YEAR-OLD STEPHEN ROMERO WAS SHOT AND KILLED AND HIS MOTHER AND GRANDMOTHER WERE SHOT AS WELL. AND SO WHILE WE ARE STILL REELING FROM GILROY THEN CAME EL PASO AND THEN CAME DAYTON. AND REALLY THERE IS A COMMON THREAD BEHIND THESE ATTACKS. AND THAT’S THIS DOMESTIC TERRORISM, THIS WHITE NATIONALISM THAT IS REALLY EM BOLD ENDED BY THE RHETORIC THAT WE ARE SEEING FROM OUR NATIONAL LEADERS AND WE HAVE A LOT OF FEAR IN OUR COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, UP GRANT COMMUNITIES, LGBTQ COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITIES OF FAITH AND ALL THE COMMUNITYS THAT KNOW HAND THE TRAUMA OF HATE. AND SO AND MY COMMUNITY, ACTUALLY CHURCH SERVICES ARE ALSO DOWN BECAUSE FAMILIES OR FRAYED, WHICH IS REMARKABLE TO ME. I HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT IN MY LIFETIME. BASICALLY WE CAN’T WAIT ANY LONGER FOR OUR DYSFUNCTION THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO TAKE ACTION IT’S OUR RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO COME TOGETHER AND TAKE ACTION, I AM HERE TO URGE YOU TO SUPPORT TODAY’S HATE CRIMES TASK FORCE AND READY TO STAND WITH YOU AND WORK WITH YOU MOVING FORWARD TO HELP OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU.>>THANK YOU.>>SUPERVISOR ELLEN BERG, TO BE FOLLOWED BY SUPERVISOR CORTESE TO BE FOLLOWED BY SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ.>>THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN. SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ, FOR BRINGING FORWARD SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT AND CERTAINLY AS A MEMBER OF AN HISTORICALLY TARGETED COMMUNITY, I APPRECIATE YOUR CALLING OUT THE INCREASING NUMBER OF HATE CRIMES AND HATE-FUELED VIOLENCE. I HAVE TWO MORE QUESTIONS I WANT TO ASK. YOU NOTED IN THE LANGUAGE PROTECT WOMEN. IS THIS NLY GEARED TOWARD HATE CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN?>>NO. THE REASON THAT I SINGLED THAT AREA OUT WAS MOSTLY SO IT DIDN’T GET LOST. I THINK WE ARE USED TO THINKING ABOUT THIS RELATIVE TO COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE LEARNING ABOUT THE PATHOLOGY OF PEOPLE WHO KILL MASS NUMBERS OF OTHER PEOPLE IS THAT THEY HAVE OFTEN HAD A HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. WHETHER IT’S BEEN WITH A PARTNER, A MARRIED PARTNER, SO REALLY I WANTED TODAY MAKE SURE WE DIDN’T IGNORE OMEN AS PART OF THE PROCESS.>>OKAY. THE LANGUAGE MAYBE NEEDS TO BE TWEAKED TO NOTE THAT.>>THAT’S A GOOD POINT.>>PARTICULARLY WOMEN BUT NOT ONLY WOMEN. THE PROCEDURAL QUESTION, I HAVE ASKED THIS BEFORE IN CONNECTION WITH OTHER COMMISSIONS. BUT WE HAVE A HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. AND I ASSUME THE CITY HAS SOMETHING SIMILAR. AND I AM ALWAYS CONCERNED THAT WE ARE NOT MAXIMIZING THE USE OF OUR COMMISSIONS. WHAT ROLE DO YOU ANTICIPATE THEM HAVING? I DO SEE FROM YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE TASK FORCE THAT IT IS PERHAPS BROADER THAN THE SPECIFIC MISSION OF THAT COMMISSION. BUT I WOULD LIKE — I WOULD LIKE THE RELEVANT COMMISSIONS FROM THE COUNTY AND THE CITY TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS PROCESS SO THAT WE ARE NOT CREATING ESSENTIALLY SILOED NEW ORGANIZATIONS OR COMMITTEES THAT DEAL WITH ISSUES THAT WE ALREADY HAVE EXISTING BODIES TO ADDRESS.>>SO I THINK YOU RAISE A GOOD POINT I APPRECIATE THE POINT. I THINK IF WE WANT TO INVOLVED MEMBERS WE THINK ABOUT THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT. THIS IS INTENDED TO BE TIME LIMITED FRANKLY WHOSE ATTENTION I NEED IS THE — OUR LOCAL DEPARTMENTS, WHETHER IT’S POLICE, SHERIFF, MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO THINK ABOUT HOW WE CAN SHARE RESOURCES TO START TO ADDRESS IT. PART THE REASON I DIDN’T SPELL OUT WHO SHOULD BE ON IT. I WANTED THE DEPARTMENT — WAS OPENING OUR DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL EQUITY AND I GET THEIR NAME WRONG.>>THANK YOU. HE CAN WIT AND I SOCIAL JUSTICE WOULD GIVE US FEEDBACK SO THAT WE COULD BE INCLUSIVE AND ALSO TIME LIMITED AND VERY DISCIPLINED ABOUT HAVING CONCRETE RECOMMENDATIONS COME OUT OF IT IT. I THINK YOUR POINT ABOUT THE PEOPLE YOU REALLY WANT TO MAKE CHANGE ARE SOMETHING THAT COMMISSIONS ARE OFTEN HUNGRY TO DO IN STRIVING FOR BUT CAN’T GET THE ATTENTION THAT YOU AS A SUPERVISOR CAN COMMAND. I THINK I WANT PORT TO THE JUST CASUALLY HAVE THEM AT THE TABLE AND OF COURSE I HAVEN’T DISCUSSED THIS WITH THEM. I THINK SOMEBODY IN AN OFFICIAL RECOMMENDATION FROM RELEVANT COMMISSIONS THAT DEAL WITH ANY ASPECT OF THIS SHOULD BE INTENTIONALLY INVITED.>>I TOTALLY AGREE, I THINK YOU ARE RIGHT, AND I THINK THAT’S GOOD FEEDBACK. I THINK THE ONLY POINT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE IS THAT WHEN THERE IS A SINCE OF URGENCY WE WANT TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SENSE OF URGENCY TO BRING BROAD –>>AGREED.>>STRATA FROM THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER TO SOLVE PROBLEMS, I AGREE WITH YOU AS WELL. I DIDN’T MEAN TO MAKE IS SOUND SO CASUAL SO THANK OU FOR THAT.>>I AM GLAD TO SUPPORT IT. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR DOING HIS.>>THANK YOU PRESIDENT SYMPTOM I SIMSIMITIAN. I AM HAPPY TO SUPPORT IT AND SEE IT COMING FORWARD. THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION OF COURSE AT THE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING LIKE MANY OF THE ISSUE YOUS THAT WE TAKE UP AS A BOARD IT WAS AN EYE-OPENER TO SEE HOW MUCH IS REALLY GOING ON AND HOW LITTLE COORDINATION THERE IS I WANT TO SUGGEST SOMETHING THAT YOU WERE THINKING ABOUT WRITING OF UP THE REFERRAL SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ, THIS IS NOW ASSUMING THIS SPAS A THOUGHT FOR EVERYONE, INCLUDING THE ADMINISTRATION. THERE IS REFERENCE TO FIREARMS TRANSFERS, THEFTS, IN A SENSE KIND OF SERVE ASKING AGAIN THE LACK OF UNIFORMITY AND IN TERMS OF HOW TATE BY STATE FIREARMS ARE TREATED. HATE CRIMES, THEMSELVES, OF COURSE, GO FAR BEYOND ANY CONNECTION TO FIREARMS, NECESSARILY. I APPRECIATE YOUR MEMO POINT IS OUT THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN MORE THAN RELUCTANT TO PROVIDE DATA ON HATE CRIMES AND I THINK THE IMPORTANT THING THAT’S LESS OF A POLITICAL BEEF WITH THE FEDERALL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND MORE OF A CERTAIN ABOUT THE LACK OF UNIFORMITY IN APPROACH. IN OTHER WORDS, IF THE FBI CAN’T OR WON’T AND I SUSPECT PART OF THEIR PROBLEM IS CAN’T, BECAUSE THERE IS SUCH A — THERE IS SUCH A DIVERGENCE OF DEFINITION OF WHAT HATE CRIMES ARE FROM STATE TO STATE TO PUT TOGETHER A FEDERAL REPORT. I THINK THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THIS TASK FORCE TO LEAD US AS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, NOT ONLY TO ADDRESS THINGS HERE WITH OUR BIGGEST CITY AND THE OTHER 14 CITIES. BUT TRY TO BE A NATIONAL LEADER, TO BRING IN THE NATIONAL FOLKS TO BRING IN THE FBI TO SAY WHAT WOULD WE HAVE TO DO IN TERMS OF A COALITION ACROSS THE COUNTRY GIVEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ITSELF IS NOT DOING IT. LIKE WE HAVE ON CLIMATE AND OTHER IMMIGRATION AREAS. WHAT WE COULD DO SO THEY COULD GENERATE THE KIND OF REPORTS THAT WOULD HELP US AND HELP LAW ENFORCEMENT DO A BETTER JOB OF GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM, ESPECIALLY WHERE THESE ISSUES ARE CROSSING STATE LINES, I THINK WITH IMMATERIAL PLEXUS FOR ME AND I AM SURE I AM BIASED A NOTION SOME OF US ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THERE IS MORE OF A COINCIDENCE THAT ARE POPPING UP INCLUDING MASS SHOOTINGS FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER. BUT I DON’T THINK WE CAN PUT THAT INFORMATION OR DATA TOGETHER WITHOUT BRINGING IF IN SOME SORT OF FEDERAL COOPERATION, BUT WHY NOT OUR TASK FORCE DOING THAT. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT FORWARD I LOOK FORWARD TO VOTING FOR IT.>>THANK YOU THAT IS AN EXCELLENT IDEA I APPRECIATE THAT.>>SUPERVISE ARE CHÁVEZ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. I WILL JUST MAKE THE MOTION.>>WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO DISPLAY THE VOTING PANEL SO THAT YOU MAY. AND THE VOTING PANEL HAS NOW BEEN.>>I WANTED MAKE A QUICK COUPLE OF COMMENTS.>>PLEASE DO. WE HAVE THE MOTION AND SECOND.>>I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I AM BEING INCLUSIVE OF THE COMMENTS, ALL COMMENTS MADE BY BY COLLEAGUES TO GIVE THE STAFF SOMETHING TO WORK FROM. I WANTED TO SAY A VERY SPECIAL THANK YOU TO MAYA, TO YOU, I THINK THE TREMENDOUS LOSS THAT YOUR FAMILY HAS HAD, IS REALLY UNSPEAKABLE. AND FOR YOU O BE THINKING BROADLY ABOUT THE COMMUNITY AT THIS TIME, JUST SPEAKS A WORLD TO YOU AND TO YOUR FAMILY AS WELL, SO THANK YOU. AND THEN TO MY COLLEAGUES, WHAT I WANTED TO SAY IS ONE OTHER THING THAT I HADN’T THOUGHT ABOUT, BUT WILL ASK STAFF TO LOOK AT IS AS PART OF THE HATE CRIMES HEARINGS THERE WERE A NUMBER OF ISSUES AND INITIATIVES THAT WE STARTED TO CARRY FORWARD. THERE ARE SOME THAT MAY BE MORE RELEVANT NOW SO I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE STAFF TAKE A LOOK AT THE REFERRAL THAT CAME TO THE BOARD FROM THE HATE CRIMES TASK FORCE. BECAUSE THERE WAS A LOT OF WORK DONE IN THAT INSTANCE THAT MAY HAVE GONE TO THE WAYSIDE. SO WITH THAT, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION AND ASK FOR MY COLLEAGUES SUPPORT BY ALSO TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR VERY, VERY THOUGHTFUL COMMENTS.>>YOU IT. AND LET ME TURN TO THE CLERK AND CONFIRM THERE ARE NO OTHER SPEAK ORES THIS ITEM. THE CLERK INDICATES THERE ARE NOT. WE WILL ASK ALL FIVE MEMBERS TO VOTE ON THEIR SCREENS, IT’S NOW BEEN DONE, WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO DISPLAY THE RESULTS AND WE’LL ANNOUNCE THAT THE MOTION CARRIES. 5-0. THANK YOU AGAIN. THANK YOU COLLEAGUES, THANK YOU SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ, THAT TAKES US ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. AND ITEM NUMBER 17 WAS PLACED ON CONCEPT, YEAH, MADAM CLERK? SO THAT TAKES US THEN TO ITEM NUMBER 18. SUPERVISE ARE CORTESE. THANK YOU. THIS MAY BE EVERYBODY SIMPLER THAN IT LOOKS, MASTER GARDENERS ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS, MASTER GARDENERS AS MOST OF YOU KNOW HAS SET UP SHOP WITH COUNTY COOPERATION MARSHALL PARK. BUT THEY HAVE BROUGHT UP TO MY OFFICE ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS FOR MORE THAN A YEAR NOW, THAT THEY ARE INTERESTED IN SOME SORT OF AGREEMENT AND HELP FROM CONTINUE I, BASICALLY UP CHRIS AND E AGREES. TO THE AREA OF THE PARK WHERE THEY ARE — ALTHOUGH WE HAVE HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS, I AM NOT ASKING THAT WE BUILD A ROAD OR FUND A ROAD, IT’S WITHIN OF THOSE OCCASIONS WITH FOLKS COMING TO MY OFFICE AS AN INDIVIDUAL SUPERVISOR ALTHOUGH WE HAVE HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS THROUGH MY OFFICE THAT I FELT LIKE IT NEEDED TO BE SURFACED FOR THE BOARD AND THAT I ASK FOR FORMAL WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT, I AM JUST ASKING THE ADMINISTRATION TO COME BACK IN 60 DAYS IT TALK TO THEM COME BACK IN 60 DAYS SEE IF THERE IS SOMETHING THERE OR SOME KIND OF PUBLIC, PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP THAT MIGHT WORK TO HELP IMPROVE THAT AREA, THAT’S IT. SO WITH THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE ITEM.>>WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO PLEASE DISPLAY THE VOTING PANEL ON THE SCREEN. I HAVE A QUESTION OR TWO. AND I SEE — OH, I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE APPARENTLY WITH COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. WHIFF A MOTION EYE SUPERVISOR CORTESE AND SECOND BY SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN AND WHY DON’T I COME DOWN THE ROW AND SEE IF SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN YOU HAVE COMMENT OR QUESTIONS?>>I DO, THANK YOU. I AM SECONDING THIS IDEA THAT’S IN MY DISTRICT AND WHAT WE WERE ASKING AND I DON’T KNOW IF MR. ROACH IS STILL HERE OR NOT, HE IS NOT. WHAT –>>YES, HE IS.>>WHERE IS DON?>>HE’S HERE.>>IT’S A COMPUTER WITH LEGS.>>HE’S HIDING FROM YOU. THE.>>QUESTION I HAD WAS IT’S MY HOPE, IS IT YOUR UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PARTICULAR USE OF FUNDS, WOULD THIS BE ELIGIBLE FOR PARK FUNDS? TO PAY FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT?>>IT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE, IT’S A ON PARKLAND, WE DO HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH MASTER GARDENERS TO WORK IN PARTNERSHIP WITH EACH OTHER, WHERE THEY WOULD DO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL.>>THAT WAS NIGH BIG QUESTION, WE HAVE A CERTAINLY PERCENTAGE THAT IS ALLOCATED TOWARDS ACQUISITION, CERTAINLY PERCENTAGE THAT IS ALLOCATED TOWARDS MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENTS, THAT TYPE OF THING, AND I JUST WANTED TO HEAR BACK AND THANK YOU FOR THAT. THAT FUNDS WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO DO WHAT SUPERVISE ARE CORTESE IS SUGGESTING HERE, THAT’S MY ONLY QUESTION, THANK YOU.>>I DON’T SEE ANY OTHER LIGHTS ON, BUT I WILL SAY, I DON’T — THIS IS A REFERRAL TO COME BACK WITH OPTIONS SO I AM HAPPY TO SUPPORT IT. I DID NOT UNDERSTAND IT TO BE A REFERRAL SPECIFICALLY CALLING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ON A PARTICULAR ROAD. AND I AM JUST, HERE AGAIN, I HAVE TO CONFESS, A LACK OF FAMILIARITY WITH THE SITE. I AM LOOKING AT THE OVERHEAD THAT I HAVE, AND I SEE A PRETTY GOOD SIDE ROAD GOING RIGHT BY ONE END OF THE RECTANGLE AND THEN PRETTY GOOD SIZE ROAD GOING IN TO THE PARKING LOT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROCKING TANGLE. AND I AM SURE THERE IS A STORY WHICH WE ARE NOT GOING TO HEAR TODAY ABOUT WHY THAT’S STILL PRESENTING ACCESS PROBLEMS, AM — I GOTTA SAY AT THE MOMENT, I AM PERPLEXED. SO I AM HOPING THAT WHEN WE GET THE REPORT BACK WITHIN 60 DAYS THAT SUPERVISE ARE CORTESE DESCRIBED THERE WILL BE SOME INFORMATION THAT REDUCES MY PERPLEX SIS AT THIS IF THERE IS SUCH A THING. OR PERPLEX I HADNESS –>>WHEN YOU GET BACK FROM HAPPY HOLLOW I CAN TAKE YOU OVER THERE.>>THERE YOU GO OF YOU DON’T WANT ME TOILING IN THE GARDENSES I CAN ASSURE YOU. NOT PRODUCE A GOOD RESULT I HAVE SOME REASON TO BELIEVE. WE CAN ASK ALL FIVE MEMBERS TO VOTE ON THE REFERRAL. ALL VOTES HAVE BEEN ASKED. THANK YOU, MR. ROCHA AND WE CAN ANNOUNCE THE RESULT 5-0 AS INDICATED ABOVE. THANK YOU, AGAIN, THAT TAKES US ONTO ITEM NUMBER 19, SUPERVISOR CORTESE.>>THANK YOU AGAIN. 19 IS ASKING US TO TAKE TWO POSSIBLE ACTIONS. ONE IS T APPROVE HE REFERRAL FRM MY OFFICE TO ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT A LETTER OF INTEREST TO SILICON VALLEY ENERGY WHICH IS OUR CCA THAT WE HAVE BOUT IN TO RELATED TO RECEIVING, NOT GIVING A REACH COAT GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000. SILICON VALLEY CLEAN ENERGY AND I AM SURE SUPERVISE IRRELEVANT ELLENBERG HAS HEARD SOMETHING ABOUT THIS. AS THE PRIMARY MEMBER REPRESENTING THE BOARD CURRENTLY. I AM AN LTERNATE MEMBER AND I THINK THREE OF US HAVE SERVED ON THE CCA BOARD IN THE PAST. BUT UNTIL RECENT WEEKS THEY HAVE OFFERED THESE GRANT IN OR JUST LOOKING TO US TO ACCEPT THE GRANT WHICH BASICALLY REQUIRES US TO EXERT SOME DUE DILIGENCE TO — WHICH IS IN PART “B” TO TRY TO ESTABLISH THE FEASIBILITY OF ADOPTING ELECTRIC IF I INDICATION REACH CODES. AS AN OVER AND ABOVE WHAT WE WOULD ORDINARILY REQUIRE OR BE REQUIRED TO DO UNDER THE COMMERCIAL CODE OR STATE CODE. THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT BY ACCEPTING THE MONEY THAT WE MODIFY OUR CODES BUT THERE IS A REQUIREMENT THAT WE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF ADOPTING REACH CODES. AS PART OF OUR CODE. OUR BUILDING PERMIT CODE. SO THAT IS THE REQUEST. CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT I HAVE TALKED TO THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ABOUT IN ADVANCE BEFORE RINGING THIS JUST TO MAKE SURE IT SEEMED LIKE A GOOD IDEA. AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS, AND AGAIN I KNOW SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG CAN SHED ANY LIGHT ON IT. BUT AT THIS POINT OUR OTHER CITY PARTNERS HAVE BASICALLY ALL SEND OR IN PROCESS ARE ACCEPTING THE GRANT, SO THEY ARE FOR EVERYBODY THAT’S A MEMBER OF THE CCA.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I SEE SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG’S LIED LITE IS ON.>>THANK YOU, SUPERVISE ARE CORTESE FOR CALLING ATTENTION TO THE WORK THAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING. OVER THE LAST EIGHT MONTHS, I HAVE REALLY ENJOYED SERVING AS A MEMBER OF THE SVCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE AS AN ADVOCATE SPECIFICALLY OR THESE CODES AND MORE GENERALLY TO UP SURE THAT OUR COUNTY BECOMES AN INCREASINGLY VALUABLE ALIBI OHIO TO SUSTAINABLE EFFORTS BEING MADE. I REALIZE THESE CODES WOULD ONLY APPLY. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY BUT I THINK IT’S A GOOD MODEL TO DEMONSTRATE TO ANOTHER CITIES SOME MORE EAGER SOME MORE RELUCTANT TO ADOPT THESE CODES AND MOVE US TOWARDS CLEAN ARER ENERGY USE ACROSS THE BOARD, SOI AM DELIGHT TODAY SUPPORT THAT.>>THANK YOU, HOWEVER WE NEED A PANEL ON OUR SCREENS TO LLOW A MOTION TO BE MADE AND WE HAVE A MOTION FROM SUPERVISOR CORTESE AND A SECOND FROM SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG, LET ME CHECK WITH THE CLERK AND SEE IF WE HAVE NY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK. WITH DOUGH NOT. UNLESS THERE ARE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WE’LL ASK ALL FIVE VOTERS. WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO DISPLAY THE CREAN AND ANNOUNCE THE MOTION CARRIES 5-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT TAKES US TO ITEM NUMBER 20, I BELIEVE. WHICH IS THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE’S REPORT.>>YES, MR. PRESIDENT, MEMBERS OF HE BOARD, I HAVE JUST TWO THINGS I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT TODAY. I WILL START WITH THE BAD ONE AND HOPEFULLY GO TO ONE THAT COULD BE THOUGHT OF AS GOOD. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN MORE PROMINENT IN TRYING TO REPAY CALIFORNIA FOLLOW OUR CHALLENGES TO HIS ADMINISTRATION AND RECENTLY HAS ESCALATED HIS ATTENTION IN THIS DIRECTION, HAS NOW DIRECTED HIS STAFF, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES TO COME UP WITH A PLAN TO REMOVE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS FROM THE STREETS OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. USING FEDERAL AGENTS. OBJECT DRUGSLY WE WILL OPPOSE SUCH AN INTERVENTION, BUT I WANTED TODAY LET PEOPLE KNOW THAT THAT IS GOING TO BE A COMPLEX PROBLEM IF IT COMES TO FRUITION. SECONDLY A LITTLE BIT HAPPIER. I WANT TO REMIND THE BOARD THAT YESTERDAY WAS THE 169th ANNIVERSARY OF STATEHOOD FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHICH WAS COMPLETED WITH THE COMPROMISE OF 1850. WHICH WAS A HUGE UNIQUE EFFORT BECAUSE IT’S ONE OF THE FEW STATES THAT NEVER WENT THROUGH THE TERRITORY PROCESS, IT WENT DIRECTLY FROM MILITARY, STATE, AFTER BEING PURCHASED FROM MEXICO TO AN ACTUAL RECOGNIZED STATE IN THE 31st STATE AT THE TIME. AS YOU’LL RECOGNIZE, THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 WAS DURING THE DEBATE –>>NOT ALL OF US WERE HERE THEN, DR. SMITH. BY WAIT, YOU ARE LOOKING REMARKABLY WELL PRESERVED FOR 169, LET ME UST SAY.>>WELL, JUST FOR FUN, BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION, FIRST CONSTITUTION OF CALIFORNIA WAS WRITTEN IN MONTEREY AND THE FIRST MODIFICATION AND SIGNATURE OF THAT CONSTITUTION IN THE LEGISLATURE HAPPENED JUST DO YOU WANT. SO IT’S ONE OF OUR BIG CLAIMS TO FAME AND THE WHOLE REASON WHY WE HAVE THE CAPITAL EXPRESSWAY UT SADLY, BECAUSE THE RAIN MADE THE GROUND MUDDY, THE LEGISLATURE DECIDED TO MOVE FROM SAN JOSE TO VALLEJO, SAME PROBLEM, MOVED TO BACK NEESHA, SAME PROBLEM. MOVED TO SACRAMENTO, AND LEFT THE COURTS BEHIND IN SAN FRANCISCO. AND WE ARE THE ONLY STATE IN THE NATION THAT HAS A SEPARATE SUPREME COURT LOCATION FROM OUR LEGISLATURE. SO THERE IS THE TRIVIA FOR YOU TODAY.>>THANK YOU. ON A MORE SERIOUS NOTE, COULD YOU GO BACK TO YOUR FIRST COMMENT, PLEASE, AND TELL US ABOUT YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS PROPOSED AND WHAT THE TIMELINE LOOKS ON THAT?>>WE DON’T HAVE A TIMELINE BUT BACK IN JULY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION — WELL, THE PRESIDENT STARTED CRITICIZING SPEAKER PELOSI AND THE CALIFORNIA DELEGATION FOR ANY MANNER OF MULTIPLE ISSUES, INCLUDING HOMELESSNESS, PARTICULARLY HOMELESSNESS IN SAN FRANCISCO. BUT AS YOU WELL KNOW, ALL OF OUR MAJOR CITIES HAVE A MAJOR HOMELESS PROBLEM. APPARENTLY AT THAT TIME HE BEGAN TO EXPLORE WITH HIS ADMINISTRATION OPTIONS OR FEDERAL INTERVENTION AND UST RECENTLY WAS PUBLICIZED OR I SHOULD SAY EVIDENCE WAS COLLECTED THAT HE HAS ACTUALLY DIRECTED STAFF TO COME UP WITH A PLAN TO USE FEDERAL AGENTS TO COME IN AND REMOVE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS FROM OUR STREETS. WE DON’T HAVE A TIMELINE. AND WE DON’T NOW WHETHER THIS IS JUST, YOU KNOW, BOISTEROUS TALK OR AN ACTUAL REALITY. BUT I THINK IT’S SIGNIFICANTLY A THREAT AND OBVIOUSLY AFFECTS US DRAMATICALLY IF IT DID HAPPEN.>>THANK YOU. I AM GOING TO LOOK TO MY OWN STAFF AND THE CHAMBERS AND ASK THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT THE ITEM IS IS ON OUR FEDERAL AFFAIRS ADVOCACY TASK FORCE AGENDA FOR ANY FOLLOW-UP THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE BASED ON WHAT INFORMATION MAY OR MAY NOT BE FORTHCOMING. THANK YOU. SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ.>>A QUICK FOLLOW-UP. WHEN DO YOUR MEETINGS OCCUR? ARE THEY REGULAR?>>THEY — WE ARE SORT OF IN A PERIOD OF TRANSITION. HISTORICALLY WE HAVE DONE THEM SORT OF MONTHLY AND THAT SEEMED NECESSARY DURING THE EARLIER DAYS OF THE ADMINISTRATION WHEN THERE WAS — THERE WERE A SERIES OF TROUBLING INITIATIVES THAT WERE COMING FAST AND FURIOUS FOR LACK OF A BETTER QUESTION. WE HAVE SINCE GONE TO EVERY OTHER MONTH FROM TIME TO TIME, AND IT’S A LITTLE BIT AS NEEDED. YOU KNOW, IF WE NEED MORE THAN THAT WE CAN O MORE THAN THAT. BUT, YOU KNOW, WE DON’T HAVE MEETINGS JUST TO HAVE MEETINGS, DURING THE FIRST COUPLE OF YEARS THERE WAS CLEAR A WORKLOAD A LOT COMING.>>JUST ONE REQUEST I WANTED TO MAKE IS THAT AT SOME POINT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS IT WOULD BE GREAT TO GET AN UPDATE ON THE WORK THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY DONE AND WHAT WE ANTICIPATE THE WORK TO LOOK LIKE. I AM PARTICULARLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE WAIVER DEBATE AND DISCUSSION AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF THAT FOR THE COUNTY BUDGET. AND SO I KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO BE TAKING THAT ON. I THINK — AND I KNOW THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL WILL BE TAKING ON SOME OF THOSE ISSUES JUST NEED TO BE CRYSTALLIZED FOR THE WHOLE BOARD.>>RIGHT.>>WE WILL.>>THANK YOU.>>ALL RIGHT. WITHOUT OBJECTION WE’LL CONSIDER THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE’S REQUEST RECEIVED AND GO TO THE COUNTY COUNCIL.>>NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS TAKEN AT THE CLOSE OF THE SECTION OF SENT NINE, 2019. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT.>>THANK YOU. COLLEAGUES THAT TAKE US TO ITEM NUMBER 22 WHICH IS THE START OF A JAIL REFORM STATUS REPORT, AM WONDERING GIVEN THE NUMBER OF ITEMS IN THAT, LONG LIST, IF IT MIGHT NOT BE WELL ADVISE TODAY SIMPLY SAY TAKE THAT 15-MINUTE RECESS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER.>>YEAH.>>MR. WASSERMAN, DOES THAT WORK FOR YOU? IT APPEARS TO BE. THEN, FOLKS, I KNOW SOME OF YOU ARE WAITING FOR THAT ITEM AND MY APOLOGIES THAT WE CAN’T DO EVERYTHING ALL AT ONCE BUT I THINK WE’LL GIVE THE BOARD A 15-MINUTE RECESS AND REMEMBER OF THE PUBLIC A 15-MINUTE RECESS AND WE’LL BE BACK A LITTLE BIT AFTER 12:15. AND WE SAND IN RECESS UNTIL THAT TIME. THANK YOU.>>ALL RIGHT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN IF WE COULD ASK THE CHAMBERS TO COME TO ORDER AND ASK MEMBERS OF THE BOARD TO PLEASE RETURN TO THE CHAMBERS. SUPERVISORS ARE WITHIN THE SOUND OF MY VOICE IF THEY COULD PLEASE RETURN TO THE CHAMBERS, WE WOULD APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU.>>AND COLLEAGUES, AGAIN, WE ARE AT ITEM 22. THIS IS THE STUDY SESSION ON JAIL REFORM. AND WE HAVE A NUMBER OF RELATED ITEMS THAT ARE ALSO ON OUR AGENDA. BUT I AM HOPING WE’LL TAKE A FEW MINUTES UNDER ITEM 22 TO ACTUALLY SORT OF TALK MORE BROADLY, GENERICALLY ABOUT SORT OF WHERE WE ARE IN THIS EFFORT AND HOW WE WANT TO CONTINUE TO STAY ON TOP OF IT GOING FORWARD. SO DR. SMITH, YOU ARE APPOINTING ME TO MS. –>>MARTHA WILL START OF THINGS, AND THEN WE’LL GO WHERE THE BOARD WANTS US TO GO.>>PLEASE DO.>>AS THE POWERPOINT COMES UP I WILL ASK YOU TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF, START WITH THIS SHERIFF’S OFFICE OVER HERE.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, CAPTAIN THOMAS DURAND.>>GOOD ACTION, CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER GUM BOWS, PERSONAL, BACKGROUND AND RECRUITING.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, CAPTAIN TIM DAVIS ELMWOOD COMPLEX.>>MEL MY HIM NECESSARY PEREZ.>>DR. [ INAUDIBLE ] BEHAVIORAL WORLD.>>FLEET.>>TONY FLEECE COUNTY EXECUTIVES OFFICE. AND THEN ALSO JOINING US IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS IS CHERLY FROM THE MANAGEMENT AUDIT TEAM. BACK IN MARCH 2016 YOU’LL RECALL THAT THE BOARD REQUESTED QU QUARTERLY STUDY SESSIONS. THIS IS HE 11th SUCH QUARTERLY STUDY SESSION. THE STUDY ACCEPTING HAS 13 DIFFERENT AGENDA ITEMS WITH SOME GOING ON THE CONCEPT CALENDAR, ITEM 22 SAY JOINT REPORT FROM HEALTH.RIFF’S OFFICE CUSTODY- FAF. AND COVERED BY THE POWER POINT IN FRONT OF, IT’S THE STATUS OF THE 80 SUMMARIZED RECOMMENDATIONS ON JAIL REFORMS. THE OTHER ITEMS ARE REPORTS AND OTHER ACTIONS TAKE WON’T JAIL REFORMS. THE BOARD PACKET IN ITEM 22 I WANT TO POINT OUT, CONTAINS UPDATES IN RED. THE STATUS OF THE JAIL CAPITAL PROPPRODUCTS AND A LIST OF JAIL RESTS THAT THE DEPARTMENTS ARE CURRENTLY WORKING ON. YOU HAVE SEEN THE SLIDE EFORE JUST POINTING OUT AS WITH PREVIOUS STUDY SESSION IS HIS WILL START TALKING ABOUT THE JAIL REFORMS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COVER ANY FUNDING THAT SOME BEEN PUT FORWARD FOR THESE REFORMS. SINCE WE LAST MET. AND THEN EACH DEPARTMENT WILL TALK ABOUT THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND FUTURE PLANS. THIS SLIDE IS MORE FOR HISTORICAL PURPOSES, I WON’T GO IN TO DIS DETAILS THE WORK THAT CONTINUE ON JAIL REFORMS SINCE THE JAIL APPROVED THEM OVER TWO YEARS AGO. OUT OF THESE MEETINGS 197 REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION FROM THE BOARD AND DEPARTMENT SITTING IN FRONT OF YOU HAVE RESPONDED TO 173 OF THESE. I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT TWO REFERRALS GOING ON RIGHT NOW. IN AUGUST THE BOARD MADE SEVERAL REFERRALS REGARDING JAIL CONSTRUCTION AROUND COST INCREASES, TIMELINES, OPERATIONAL IMPACTS AND SUCH. ADMINISTRATIONS WORKING TO BRING A REPORT BACK IN OCTOBER AND THEN ALSO QUARTERLY UPDATES TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE. THE SECOND THING I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT IS THE JAIL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, THE PROJECT WAS REACTIVATED AS WE TOLD YOU ABOUT. BACK IN FEBRUARY OF 2019. THE VENTURE COVER AND COUNTY STAFF SPENT THE FIRST FEW MONTHS RAMPING UP TO GET THE PROJECT BACK ON TRACK. LAST MONTH THE BOARD APPROVED TWO CHANGE ORDERS AND THE PROJECTED TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION IS NOW SUMMER OF 2020. AND JUST A REMINDER THAT STAKEHOLDER GROUPS AT ALL LEVELS OF THE ORGANIZATION AND DEPARTMENTS CONTINUE TO MEET TO ADDRESSED ONGOING REFORM INITIATIVES AS WELL AS THE I PRELIMINARY MINUTE ARE MENTATION OF THE CONCEPT DECREES. YOU HAVE SEEN THE SLIDE BEFORE IT’S ALSO POSTED ON THE JAIL REFORM’S WEBSITE. FOUR LEAST 80 SUMMARIZED RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETE. THERE IS STILL A LOT OF WORK TO DO BUT I CAN’T EMPHASIZE ENOUGH THE WORK DONE BY THE DEPARTMENTS YOU SEE SITTING IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY.>>WE CONTINUE UP ON DATE THE WEBSITE INCLUDING WHAT’S NEW THE ARCHIVE AND ANY UPDATES TO SUMMARIZE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THEN THIS AND THE NEXT FOUR SIDES COVER FUNDING AND ACTIONS SIN THE LAST STUDY SECTION ON MARCH 19th AND THE TWO SLIDES AFTER THAT COVER ACTIONS IN THE BULLET SO IN THE INTEREST OF TIME, WITH THE BUSINESS A AGENDA WE ARE HAPPY NO TO NOT COVER THESE SLIDES UNLESS THERE IS A DESIRE.>>COLLEAGUES.>>NO, WE HAVE THEM AND ARE GOOD. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT.>>WITH THAT WE’LL HAND IT OVER TO THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE TO CONTINUE.>>GOOD AFTERNOON I AM CAPTAIN DURAN AND I OVERSEE THE SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION. THE SHERIFF OFFICE HAS CONTINUE TO MAXIMIZE OUT F CELL TIME AND STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING FOR ALL INMATES, CLOSING W1 AT THE ELMWOOD FACILITIES AND MOVING THEM TO M1 WAS A HUGE STEP TOWARDS THIS GOAL. WE ALSO WORKED TO I WANT GREAT PROTECTIVE CUSTODY IF HE FEMALES IN TO GENERAL POPULATION, WON’T HAVE ONE FEMALE INMATE AND SIX MALE INMATES WHO ARE UNABLE TO BE OUT OF CELL WITH OTHER INMATES. WE ARE ALSO WORKING ON WE ARE WORKING TO CHANGE OUR PROGRAMMING CURRICULUM AND SCHEDULE I GO HAD INSURE MAXIMUM PARTICIPATION. IT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THE JAIL WEBSITE SOON AND WE’LL SEND AN OFF-AGENDA REPORT LETTING THEM KNOW WHEN THE NEW SCHEDULE IS LIVE.>>I M CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER [ INAUDIBLE ] AND I OVERSEE BACKGROUND AND RECRUITING UNIT. HERE IS AN UPDATED CHART OF HIRING FOR THE CUSTODY ACADEMIES. WE HAVE SEEN THIS IN OUR QUARTERLY UPDATES, IT HIGHLIGHTS CUSTODY ACADEMIES THROUGH THE FISCAL YEAR, WE JUST GRADUATED 40 CADETS ON THURSDAY, 20 OF THOSE BEING ASSIGNED TO MAIN JAIL AND 22 THE ELMWOOD FACILITY. THEY ARE ALL DISTRIBUTED EVENLY BETWEEN ALL SHIFTS TO INCREASE OUR COVERAGE. WE HAVE CONTINUE TO MAKE GREAT PROGRESS TOWARDS MAXIMUM CANDIDATES AND WE LOOK TOWARD A TO THE STAFFING ANALYSIS AND>>I AM DR. MAN THAT WOULD YELL- WOODS AND TALKING ABOUT CUSTODY HEALTH SERVICES, SO CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW CUSTODY 70 EVERYONE SIS IN THE SHERIFF AFTERNOON DEPARTMENT IS IN COLLABORATIONS WITH COUNTY COUNCIL TO REVISE OUR CURRENT POLICIES TO MEET THE A D.A. MANDATES. POLICIES ARE ALSO BEING REVISED FOR CUSTODY HEALTH SERVICES O COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECIPIENTS MEAL YET PLAN AS WELL. CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW WE ARE LOOKING AT IMPLEMENTING A WIDE CARD ELECTRIC PILOT STUDY WHICH WILL KICKOFF SOMETIME IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. ALSO IN COLLABORATION WITH CUSTODY BUREAU TO START ALLOWING OR PROVIDING INFORMATION OR NOTICES TO INMATES 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE SO THEY WOULD BE AWARE OF CLINICAL SERVICES SO WE CAN IMPROVE OUR COMPLIANCE RATE. CUSTODY HEALTH SERVICES IS ALSO WORKING WITH REENTRY ON SSA TO INSURE THAT WE CAN IMPROVE OUR PROTOCOLS FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS PRIOR TO RELEASE. WITH REGARDS O MEDICATION IMPROVEMENTS, WE HAVE MADE IMPROVEMENTS IN THREE DIFFERENT AREAS FOR MEDICATION COMPLIANCE. REGARDING CARDIAC MEDICATIONS, WE IMPROVEED FROM AT THIS ARIZONA 32 PERCENT RATE TO A 63% RATE WITH REGARDS TO CARDIO WAS SASSE CUELLAR MEDICATIONS WE WENT FROM 30% RATE TO 69 AND THEN FINALLY, PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS 27 PERCENT RATE TO 61% RATE. WHICH I FEEL IS A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT AND WE HOPE TO IMPROVE THOSE NUMBERS AS WE MOVE FORWARD. ALL THE ACUTE PSYCH TEAM IMPLEMENT A UNIT-BASED TEAM TO IMPROVE OUR REPORTS IN THE MORNING TO IMPROVE OUR PATIENT CARE. SINCE WE HAVE PLACED PSYCHIATRISTS IN OUR BOOING AREA WE HAVE MANAGED TO DECREASE EMERGENT BEHAVIOR CONSULT REQUESTS BEING THE FACT THAT THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE BEEN PRESENCE — EXCUSE ME THE PSYCHIATRISTS PRESENT AT THE TIME AND WE WERE ABLE TO SEE THEM IMMEDIATELY INSTEAD OF THEM HAVING TO WAIT OVER A PERIOD OF TIME.>>AND I AM SPEAKING ABOUT ONE OF THE PROGRAMS, THIS IS THE STEP PROGRAM WHICH IS FOR SUBSTANCE USE INSIDE CUSTODY AND THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM HAS BEEN VERY EFFECTIVE IN THIS FIRST YEAR. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT WE HAVE HAD OVER A THOUSAND REFERRALS. AND MANY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SCREENED. BEST BEEN SUCCESSFUL N PLACING PEOPLE IN TO TREATMENT AND IN TO RECOVERY RESIDENCES, SO THOSE NUMBERS FOR THE POPULATION WE ARE SERVING ARE QUITE POSITIVE. THE OTHER THING THAT’S HAPPENED OVER THE SUMMER IS IN ADDITION WE ARE ADDING STEPS PROGRAM TO SERVE FEMALE AND LGBTQ INMATES OVER AT THE ELMWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER.>>ROGER [ INAUDIBLE ] PLEAT. STAT OUT PROJECTS NEW MAIN JAIL SOUTH. [ INAUDIBLE ] COMPLETE. WE HAVE UPDATED DESIGNS TO THE BOARD IN DECEMBER 2018. AND CURRENTLY AGREE WITH THE STATE. WE HOPE TO ADVERTISE RFP THE FALL OF 2019 AND SOUTH CONTINUES TO BE FOLLOWED WITH THE DEMOLITION IN FALL OF 2019. MAIN JAIL NORTH CONSTRUCTION IN PROJECT AND SCHEDULE COMPLETE DECEMBER 2019. SUICIDE PREVENTION, SYSTEMS COMPLETE FOR ELMWOOD AND MAIN JAIL NORTH AND SCHEDULED WITH A.D.A. IMPROVEMENTS TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO HOUSING UNITS, SCHEDULE IS COMPLETE 2022 THROUGH THE PHASING OF WORK. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT WORK MAIN JAIL NORTH QUICK FIXES ARE 100 PERCENT COMPLETE. QUICK PHYSICIANS CONSTRUCTION HAS STARTED IN THE FOLLOWING UNITS AND ARE ABOUT 45% COMPLETE. MAIN JAIL NORTH 8A, WOMEN’S W-2 AND ELMWOOD’S M8. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO COMPLETE 222. MAIN JAIL NORTH ELMWOOD HEALTH ADMIN CONSTRUCTION 32 COMPLETE. WITH CONCLUSION 2021 FEBRUARY. AND WEST GATE PARTNERING DESIGNS COMPLETE BUT WE ARE RESCOPING DUE TO THE BUDGET. AND ELMWOOD 88 PATH OF TRAVEL DESIGNS DESIGNS ARE COMPLETE. AND PERMIT IS OMPLETE. PHYSICAL WORK IS GOING TO TART 2022. ELMWOOD SERVICE MODEL AND OPERATIONAL PLANS IN PROGRESS AND SCHEDULED TO OMPLETE THE SPRING OF 20/20.>>THAT COMPLETES THE PRESENTATION, WE’LL GO AHEAD AND TAKE QUESTIONS.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COLLEAGUES, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL ITEMS COMING UP AS YOU KNOW ON OUR AGENDA. THAT ARE CORRECTED TO JAIL REFORM EFFORTS AND OUR EFFORTS IN THE JAIL MORE BROADLY HAN THAT. I WANTED TO START THE CONVERSATION OFF BY SAYING, I THINK I ASKED THAT QUESTION COMMENCE THESE QUARTERLY STUDY SESSIONS IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON’T LOSE IMPACT. LOSE ATTENTION OR FOCUS RATHER ON JAIL REFORM. AT THIS TIME IN A MINUTE, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER TO SORT OF HAVE SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT SORT OF MORE BROADLY WHERE ARE WE. BECAUSE WE ARE PRETTY DEEP IN TO THE DETAILS HERE. AND I KNOW THAT THAT’S WHAT ALL OF YOU HAVE TO DO ON A DAILY BASIS SO THANK YOU FOR HAT. I WANTED TO RAISE THE CONVERSATION P A LITTLE BIT. BEFORE I DO THAT, HOW HAVE, YOUI WANT TO TURN TO PICKED OF THE PUBLIC WHO TURNED CALLS IN, I WANT TO CALL ANGELA KING, ANTHONY WALTERS AND RON HANSEN AND I BELIEVE THOSE ARE THE ONLY CARDS THAT WE HAVE SO FAR ON THIS ITEM. PLEASE TURN YOUR CARDS IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK BECAUSE WE WILL FINISH WITH PUBLIC COMMENT APPROXIMATE AND BEAT BRING MATTER BEFORE THE OARD TO RECEIVE THE REPORT FORMALLY. COME ON UP, MANSLAUGHTER KING. WELCOME. HANG ON JUST A MOMENT, PLEASE, MS. KING, WE ARE GOING TO RESET YOUR TIME. THERE’S MICROPHONE BUILT IN YOU NEED TO SPEAK STRAIGHT AHEAD IT’S RIGHT THERE IN FRONT OF YOU AT THE TOP OF THAT BLACK. THAT’S IT.>>OKAY.>>WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU CAN BE HEARD. GO AHEAD.>>SO I’LL TRY AND BE QUICK. WHAT I HAVE BEEN DOING IS MEETING OUR NPA, MYSELF, REPRESENTING THE NURSES FOR SOME COURT ISSUES THAT WE ETHICALLY FEEL ARE VERY IMPORTANT. I WILL BRING UP A FEW OF THOSE, ONE OF THEM IS 24 HOUR M.D. COUGH WITHIN BETWEEN 10:00 AND 8:00 A.M. WE HAVE NO DOCTOR COVERAGE, NURSES MAKE ALL THE MEDICAL DECISIONS ON 5,000 INMATES. WHICH IS CLEARLY OUT OF THEIR SCOPE. THINK WE HAVE HAD PROBLEMS. AND I KNOW THAT DR. CHURNY HAS PUT IN A RECOMMENDATION FOR AN URGENT CARE 24 HOUR URGENT CARE AND I AM JUST WAITING FOR THAT TO BE APPROVED. THE SECOND IS WE HAVE AN INFIRMARY AND WE HAVE AN EIGHTH FLOOR ACUTE PSYCH UNIT, WE HAVE ASKED FOR A FULL-TIME JANITOR DURING THE AY TO BE ABLE TO CLEAN THE CELLS OF THESE PATIENTS ALL OF THESE PATIENTS ARE EITHER PHYSICALLY OR MENTALLY INCAPABLE OF KEEPING EVEN A RUDIMENTARY CLEAN ENVIRONMENT. WHAT HAPPENS IS WHEN SOMEONE IS GOING TO TOUR, THERE IS A MASS CLEANUP, THE TOUR HAPPENS, AND THEN PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO ARE IN THE GRASSROOTS SEE THE REALITY. AND I HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WILL NOT APPROVE AND I AM ASKING FOR THEM TO RECONSIDER. WE HAVE SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS ON THE FOURTH FLOOR, WE ARE ADMINISTERING MEDICATIONS TO THEM IN A VERY UNSAFE MANNER. I AM GOING RUN OVER, CAN I HAVE TWO MORE MINUTES?>>I AM AFRAID NOT. BUT THERE MIGHT BE A FOLLOW-UP QUESTION FROM A MEMBER OF OUR BOARD.>>OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I DIDN’T –>>LET ME HELP HERE, WHAT OTHER CONCERNS DO YOU HAVE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US TONIGHT?>>THANK YOU. I WON’T TAKE UP A THE LOT. SO THESE PATIENTS — WE HAVE HAD 17 NURSES WALK OFF FOR SITUATIONS THAT HAVE HAPPENED IN THE CUSTODY SETTING. THERE IS NO WRITE-UP –>>WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? WALKED OFF.>>THEY ARE ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE OR THEY HAVE BEEN FIRED.>>BECAUSE?>>VARIOUS REASONS. BUT WHAT I AM SAYING IS IF WE HAD 24 HOUR PHYSICIAN, THAT WOULD WAS AVAILABLE TO US, WE WOULDN’T BE MAKING DECISIONS THAT CAN JEOPARDIZE OUR LICENSE. ON THE FOURTH FLOOR, WE ARE ADMINISTERING MEDICATIONS TO OUR MOST SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS, IN A WAY THAT WE HAVE NO IDEA IF THEY ARE TAKING THE MEDICATION, WHAT’S A HIGH-RISK TO GET WALKED OFF. THEY ARE HOARDING THEIR MEDICATION, THEY TAKE IT ALL, THEY OVERDOSE, THEY DIE. MY RESPONSIBILITY FOR HAVING GIVEN THEM THESE PILLS.>>GOT IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>OKAY AND I ASK EIGHT MOD AGO FOR LANGUAGE LINES AND A SIGN LANGUAGE LAPTOP IN BOOKING AND IN THE CLINICS. THIS IS A VERY HIGH-RISK ALSO FOR PATIENTS. WE ARE PUTTING THEM ON SPEAKER PHONE EVERY TIME I INTERVIEW A PATIENT DOWN IN BOOKING I AM VIOLATING HIPAA REGULATIONS AND I AM ALSO AT RISK OF PATIENT NOT DIE V INDIVIDUALING TO ME THEIR MEDICAL CONDITIONS BOW THEY WOULD WANT WANT IT BLASTED.>>I HAVE TO SAY THANK OU, WE HAVE GONE WELL OVERTIME I WANTED TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY.>>I AM SO SORRY.>>IF YOU HAVE INFORMATION IN WRITING EAGER NOW YOU CAN GIVE IT TO THE CLERK SHOW COP AT THIS AND MAKE SURE WE ALL GET COPIES OR IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO PULL IT TOGETHER 24 IN NOTES FOR IN THE YOU CAN’T GET IT TO YOU GET IT TO THE CLERK OR THE BOARD WE WILL REQUEST THAT SHE TEAR SAMARDZIJA IRRELEVANT IT WITH ALL FIVE MEMBERS OF BOARD OF SUPERVISOR.>>OKAY, SORRY.>>NO, IN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>WOL TERES AND MR. HANSEN, PLEASE COME ON UP.>>GOOD AFTERNOON. PATIENT SAFETY IS — EXCUSE ME I A AM ANTHONY WALTERS ASSOCIATION REGISTERED CHECKS REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE REGISTER NURSES PATIENT SAFETY IS AT THE TOP OF OUR LIST, NUMBERS ONE YOUR HONORS IN ARE REGALLY SCHEDULED FOR DOUBLE SHIFTS THEY ARE EXTREMELY OVERWORKED AND TIRED. NUMBER TWO, OUR NPA HAS RECEIVED MORE ASSIGNMENT DESPITE OBJECTION FORMS HAN EVER BEFORE IN IS 40 YEARS HISTORY. THIS MEANS THAT NURSES ARE DOCUMENTING UNSAFE ASSIGNMENTS AND REPORTING THEM TO MANAGEMENT. THREE, THERE ARE NOT ANY DOCTORS AS YOU HAVE HEARD ON CALL FOR MEDICAL CONSULTATIONS AFTER 10:00 P.M. THIS IS NOT SUSTAINABLE. NOR DOES IT ADDRESS WHOLE PATIENT CARE. FOUR, OUR NURSES HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT THE STAFFING SHORTAGE AT SEVERAL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETINGS HAVE SOME HAVE RECORDED SPEECHES ASKING TO YOU SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS, PATIENT SAFETY IS IN JEOPARDY AND YOUR MEET ACTION IS NEEDED. WE KNOW THAT YOU UNDERSTAND THE SEVERITY OF THESE ISSUES. AND WE ASKING FOR YOUR CONTINUED COMMIT TO HIM IMPROVING OUR CUSTODY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. PLEASE CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING PATIENT RATIOS IN OUR CUSTODY HEALTH SETTINGS I THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR SUPPORT FOR OUR NURSES IN THE COUNTY OF ANTA CLARA.>>THANK YOU, MR. HAPPEN SESSION YOU ARE UP NEXT, SIR.>>GOOD AFTERNOON I AM RON HANSEN AFFILIATED WITH PACT. PEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY TOGETHER. I AM SPEAKING HERE TO YA, SUMMARIZED RECOMMENDATIONS OVR1 THROUGH FOUR. MANY HERE WILL RECALL THAT LEADING THE LARGE LIST OF JAIL REFORMS PUT FORWARD BY.BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION, AMONG OTHERS WAS A NEED FOR JAIL AND SHERIFF’S OFFICE OVERSIGHT BODY AND THE NEED O EXAMINE AND POSSIBLY MODIFY THE CURRENT JOINT SHERIFF AND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OPERATION OF THE JAIL. UNFORTUNATELY, 3 1/2 YEARS AFTER THE CESSATION OF THE BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION AND NEARLY FIVE MONTHS AFTER RECEIVING THE REPORT OF THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE, I AND OTHERS HOPE THAT THE BOARD IS ABOUT READY TO MOVE FORWARD WAY CONTRACT FOR THE OFFICE OF CORRECTION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT MONITORING. OCLEM. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THIS OFFICE IS ALL THE MORE IMPORTANT BECAUSE FOR THE LAST YEAR THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE HAS REFUSE TODAY MEET WITH COMMUNITY MEMBERS ON JAIL-RELATED ATTERS. WE URGE THE BOARD TO MOVE FORWARD, WITH ALL DELIBERATE HASTE TO ESTABLISH AND APPOINT OFFICE OF CORRECTION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ONITORING. THANK YOU.>>THANK YOU. ON THAT POINT, COLLEAGUES, I CAN REPORT TO YOU ALL, FORGIVE ME I SHOULD BE SPEAKING IN TO THE MICROPHONE. I CAN REPORT TO YOU ALL THAT SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ ND I, WHO ARE YOUR AD HOC TASK FORCE ON THIS ITEM, HAVE RECEIVED THE COMMENTS FROM THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE OR THE REVIEW COMMITTEE I FORGET THE PROPER TERMINOLOGY THAT REVIEWED PROPOSALS FROM A NUMBER OF POSSIBLE CONSULTING FIRMS THAT MIGHT SERVE AS OUR — BELIEVE IT OR OT WE CALL IT THE ACTION ENOUGH O CLEM, AND WE THINK WE WILL BE READY SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ, CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG. AT THE FIRST MEETING IN OCTOBER TO COME FORWARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE INTERVIEWS THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO CONDUCT AT MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ON OUR BEHALF BUT WE ARE HOPEFUL WE WILL COME TO YOU WITH A RECOMMENDATION IN THE FIRST MEETING OF OCTOBER. SO THANK YOU FOR THE PROMPT. YOU ANTICIPATED AN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN FORTHCOMING. THERE WE GO. MORE BROADLY, COLLEAGUES, AND MS. WHAT PENSKE, I WILL TURN TO YOU AND DR. SMITH. I THINK FLEE YEARS IN TO THIS EXERCISE. WE HAVE — THE STRENGTH AND THE WEAKNESS OF THE EFFORT IS PERHAPS THE SAME. AND THAT IS THAT AS THE ENCLOSURE POINTS OUT WE HAVE 623 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 15 DIFFERENT SOURCES THAT ARE GROUP ED IN FOR 80 SUMMARIZED RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN 13 CATEGORIES. I THINK WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL THAT WE DON’T, AS WE LOOK POINT BY POINT BY POINT TO AKE SURE THAT THERE IS FOLLOW-UP, WHICH WE HAVE TO DO. THAT WE SORT OF DON’T LOSE TRACK OF BIGGER PICTURE AND I AM ANXIOUS THAT THESE STUDY SESSIONS HAVE BECOME INCREASINGLY GRANULAR RATHER THAN SORT OF BIG PICTURE OPPORTUNITIES TO ASSESS HOW WE ARE DOING ON ISSUE WERE CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT. CUSTODY HEALTH MORE BROADLY AND SO ON. THE 13 CATEGORIES WAS AN EFFORT I THINK TO HELP US DO THAT. IF ONLY WE WOULD TAKE THAT OPPORTUNITY. I ALSO THINK THAT IT’S PROBABLY TIME AND FORGIVE ME SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG, BUT IT’S PROBABLY TIME FOR US TO TRY AND PUSH SOME OF THIS CONVERSATION IN TO POLICY COMMITTEE LEVEL AT THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE SO THAT YOU AND SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN CAN HEAR SOME OF THIS AT LATER LENGTH. I DON’T THINK WE SHOULD STOP HAVING THE REPORT BACKS OR STUDY SESSIONS AT THE FULL BOARD LEVEL BUT WE NEED TO FIND A WAY HERE TO MAKE THEM MORNING SORT OF A CHECK THE BOX OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BOARD OR SORT OF REPORT FROM THE ALL OF YOU ABOUT EVERY ONE OF THE 623 ITEMS. I AM GOING TO LET IT GO FOR THE MOST BECAUSE I KNOW MY CLERKS WANT TO SHARE THEIR THOUGHTS AS WELL BUT I’M HOPING BEFORE WE TAKE ACTION TODAY TO RECEIVE THE REPORT, WE ARE SPEAK BIG HOW DO WE MOVE FORWARD TO STAY ON TOP OF THESE ISSUES. IN A SORT OF A MORE COMPREHENSIVE WAY ANDGHTLY LESS LINE BY LINE BY LINE.>>THANK YOU, PRESIDENT SYMPTOM, I LIKE THE IDEA OF THAT MIGHT ALSO CREATE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR EMPLOYEES YOU KNOW, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WAY OF PUTTING IT RANK AND FILE. EMPLOYEES WHO ARE, YOU KNOW, DOING THE DAY-TO-DAY WORK. AS DIRECTED BY MANAGEMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THESE RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE ABLE TO GIVE SOME KIND OF OLLING FEEDBACK AS TO HOW THINGS ARE REALLY WORKING OR MAYBE THINGS THAT MIGHT NOT BE EXPLICITLY CALLED OUT IN THE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS UT ARE SORT OF A NUANCE THAT GO ALONG WITH THAT. I THINK SOME OF THE, WHAT I WAS HEARING FROM THE SPEAKERS, IS I HAVE HEARD IN SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS MYSELF, WITH NURSES PARTICULARLY, I WILL JUST USE THE DISPENSATION OF MEDICINE AS A — NOT AS A STAFFING ISSUE IN THE SENSE OF MEET AND CONFER AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND DO WE NEED MORE STAFF AND SOME OF THINGS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN THIS REPORT IN TERMS OF FUTURE STAFFING INCREASES AND I UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING NEGOTIATIONS ALL THE WHILE. BUT I THINK THERE ARE SOME ISSUES AROUND STAFFING PRACTICE, THAT PEOPLE SEE HAPPENING. LIKE HOW WE ARE DISPENSING DRUGS THAT WOULD REQUIRE AN ADJUST, OPERATIONALLY. REPORT REALLY NECESSARILY OR SHOULDN’T BE PROBABLY MEET AND CONFER OR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ITEMS OR ITEMS THAT GET CALLED OUT WITH IMMATERIAL POLICE MEN TAKES AND RECOMMENDATIONS. I I WOULD LIKE TO SEE, AND I HAVE TALKED TO DR. SMITH ABOUT, SOME KIND OF A, YOU KNOW, I KIND OF WANT TO SAY A TECHNICAL AHEAD SAY ARE YOU COMMITTEE THAT INVOLVES IMMATERIAL PLOY IS WHO ARE TRYING TO PULL OFF SOME OF THESE PRACTICES. TRYING TO ACTUALLY DO THESE THINGS. OR MAYBE INFORMALLY THE EXECUTIVE HIM SEVEN OR HIS DESIGNEES IN MORE OF A BROWN BAG TYPE OF ENVIRONMENT JUST SITTING DOWN AND SAYING WHAT ARE YOU SEEING, WHERE ARE THE GLARING ISSUES FROM YOUR STANDPOINT AND HOW DO WE BRINGS THESE RECOMMENDATIONS LIFE WHEN IT KOLTSZ DOWN TO WHAT IT’S LIKE TO ACTUALLY FUNCTION IN THE DAY IN THE LIFE I’VE NURSE OR THE DAY IN THE LIFE I’VE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER. IF THAT’S ALREADY HAPPENING, IT WOULD BE GOOD TO HEAR THAT. BUT IT’S A DISCUSSION THAT I HAVE HAD IN SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS WITH SOME OF THE EMPLOYEES, WHICH HAD NO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IMPORT AT ALL. OR SUBSTANCE. JUST CONCERN AND COMPASSION FOR THE QUALITY OF THE WORK THAT THEY ARE DELIVERING. AND ACCORDING TO THEM, IT DOESN’T HAVE THAT KIND OF AN OUTLET AND I FEEL THAT WAY AS A SUPERVISOR SOMETIMES AND I AM SURE SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE EXPERIENCED THIS. SOMETIMES YOU FEEL LIKE PEOPLE ARE COMING TO YOU NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE TRYING TO GO OVER ANYONE’S HEAD OR END RUN THE PROCESS. BUT THEY JUST DON’T KNOW WHERE IN THE PROCESS ARE THEY ABLE TO MAKE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS OTHER THAN DROPPING SOMETHING IN A SUGGESTION BOX OR WRITING ANOTHER E-MAIL. WHERE CAN THERE BE ACTUAL TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION AROUND A SMALL TABLE IN A ROUNDTABLE STYLE WHERE WE CAN GET TO SOME THESE, MAYBE LESS ARE BUT STILL CRITICAL ISSUES WHEN IT COMES TO EVERYONE’S WELL BEING AND SAFETY. — I’LL STOP THERE.>>I JUST –>>I WILL STOP THERE. I WAS FISH FOR THIS COUNTY EXECUTIVE AS WELL TO INDICATE WHAT LOO THAT CAN BE DONE. WITHOUT COMMINGLE THAT GO WITH COLLECTIVE BARGAIN PROCESSES THAT ARE UNDERWAY.>>BEFORE WE GO FORWARD, I — SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ IS NEXT NO LINE. THAT BEING SAID, I SEE THAT SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG WANTS TO COMMENTS ON THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF THE CONVERSATION.>>JUST BRIEFLY ON THIS PARTICULAR PIECE.>>AND I KNEE SUPERVISOR CORTESE WAS LOOKING TO OUR COUNTY EXECUTIVE. LET’S HEAR BRIEFLY IN SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG, DR. SMITH CHIME IN AND THEN BACK TO SUPERVISOR CORTESE TO MAKE SURE THAT HE DOESN’T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS AND HEN TO SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ WHO THREE THEORETICALLY IS NEXT IN LINE.>>THANK YOU AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THE INTERRUPTION. SUPERVISOR CORTESE, I WANTED TO NOTE THAT — THAT WAS NOT MY INTENT. BUT JUST TO NOTE THAT THE VERY KIND OF GROUP THAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING ACTUALLY DOES EXIST THE CHALLENGES THAT THEY ARE FACING AS I THINK RON HANSEN MENTIONED IS THAT THEIR BRIEFLY REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS WITH THE SHERIFF WERE TERMINATED A MONTH AGO AND I WONDER IF PERHAPS HE BUILDUP IN WHAT YOU ARE HEARING IS AT LEAST INDIRECTLY A RESULT OR PARTIALLY A RESULT OF THOSE MEETINGS BEING SUSPENDED. AND I HAVE ASKED AT PS J.C. BEFORE AND I WILL ASK AGAIN NOW IF THE SHERIFF THROUGH SURE REPRESENTATIVES WOULD RECONSIDER MEETING WITH THAT GROUP OF COMMUNITY ADVOCATES AND CON FITCH STITCH WENT REGULARLY TO ADDRESS ON THE GROUND IN THE MOMENTISH THAT’S PEOPLE ARE SEEING.>>THROUGH THE CHAIR, ARE YOU LOOKING FOR A RESPONSE? WE ARE RECEIVING DIFFERENT MESSAGES.>>I WOULD LOVE A RESPONSE. OF COURSE THE SHERIFF IS NOT HERE TODAY. WE WILL TAKE THAT BACK TO HER AND EXPLAIN TO HER. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED AN OFF-AGENDA RESPONSE. THAT WAS A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, WE WILL REVISIT THE ISSUE.>>THANK YOU.>>DR. SMITH, AND THEN I WANT TO GO TO SUPERVISOR CORTESE AND THEN SUPERVISE ARE CHÁVEZ.>>I HEARD SUPERVISOR CORTESE SUGGEST MEETING ON A REGULAR BASIS WITH NURSING STAFF AND MEDICAL STAFF AND CUSTODY AND I DO MEET ON A REGULAR BASIS WITH OUR NPA BUT IT’S IN MY OFFICE SO I THINK WHAT I WILL DO IN RESPONSE TO YOUR QUESTION IS SET UP MEETINGS ON A MONTHLY BASIS AT THE JAIL AND WE’LL PROBABLY ROTATE BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN MAIN JAIL AND ELMWOOD AND DO EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. SO I CAN GET A FEEL MYSELF OF WHAT IS GOING ON. MAKE AN APPROPRIATE ACTION.>>TO ME THAT SOUPS INE. AND PRESIDENT SIMITIAN, AS FAR AS WHY YOU WERE COMING BACK TO ME. I MAINLY WANT TO SURFACE THE ISSUE AND YOU MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS AN APPROPRIATE PLACE FOR THESE THINGS TO GO. I DON’T THINK THAT SHOULD EXCLUDE THE COMMITTEE OR THE BOARD OF SIGN VISOR KIND OF MIRRORING WHAT YOU SAID EARLIER. IT SEEMS LIKE THERE NEEDS TO BE TECHNICAL OLKS. I HAVE NEVER REALLY BEEN ENTIRELY COMFORTABLE JUST REALLY BECAUSE OF THE 30,000-FOOT ALTITUDE I AM AT MOST OF THE TIME UNDERSTANDING, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU GET IN TO THESE KIND OF CUSTODY HEALTH ISSUES ABOUT THINGS LIKE DELIVERING MEDICINE, PEDESTRIANS, WHO IS IN CHARGE AND WHAT SHOUT BE RUNNING THAT. I CAN IMAGINE THE SHERIFF SAYING I AM MORE THAN HAPPY TO DO WHAT I CAN, BUT I DON’T REALLY HAVE THE XPERTISE MYSELF OR THE — OR PERHAPS EVEN THE AUTHORITY, YOU KNOW, TO DICTATE EXACTLY HOW MEDS ARE DISBURSED, I CAN IMAGINE THAT IT. THAT’S NOT TO SAY SHERIFF SHOULDN’T BE THERE SO IF THERE IS A DECISION THAT SOMEBODY WHO IS IN CHARGE OF FOLKS IN THE JAIL CAN MAKE SHOWER IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS THAT WAY. SO I JUST APPRECIATE THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE STEPPING UP AND LEANING IN ON THE ISSUE AND SAYING, HE’S WILLING TO CONDUCT THOSE MEETINGS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY. SOUNDS LIKE A LITTLE BIT MORE OPENLY. I JUST THINK THERE IS A PIECE IT HAVE THAT WILL REQUIRE THE MEDICAL EXPERTISE THAT YOU HAVE AND YOUR SIDE OF THE OPERATION HAS. WHEN I A MEDICAL AMINA IS CONTRACT BOARD MENTAL HEALTH AND PHYSICAL HEALTH. THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG FOR REMINDING ME ABOUT THAT OTHER PROCESS THAT’S BROKEN DOWN. THANK YOU.>>I AM JUST ASKING DR. WOODS TO WORK WITH MY OFFICE TO SET IT UP.>>YES, I ILL.>>THANK YOU.>>DULY NOTED. THAT TAKES US TO SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ TO BE TOLD BY SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG.>>THANK YOU. DR. SMITH, I — HERE SAY CONCERN THAT I WOULD LOVE TO YOUR YOUR EXPERTISE N. AS IT RELATES TO MEDICALS IN THE JAILS I HAVE BEEN PARTY TO A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS WITH THE STAFF HERE, WITH OUR NPA. WE HAVE TAKEN A TOUR, WE MET, WE HAVE HAD A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE GRAY AREA BETWEEN WHOSE JOB IS WHAT NEEDS TO BE MORE CLEARLY EFINED AND DEFINED. EVEN WITHIN THE JAILS THEMSELVES IN TERMS OF WHOSE JOB CERTAIN TOPICS FALL UNDER. I WANT I HAD TO GIVE YOU THE LIST OF ISSUES IF YOU COULD AT SOME POINT COME BACK. BUT REALLY DEFINING SO WE MO WHO TO HOLD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT PART OF CHALLENGE IN THE JAIL. SO AS YOU ALL GO THROUGH THESE MEETINGS AND RESOLVE THEM YOU CAN SAY THIS IS PERSON THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE. SO MEDICAL COVERAGE IN THE JAILS, NOT JUST THE MISSING TIME THAT WE DON’T HAVE A DOCTOR ON SITE THINK BUT MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE DOCTORS AVAILABLE DURING THE TIMES WE ARE SUPPOSED O HAVE THEM EVERYBODY NOW. WE ARE GETTING FEEDBACK THAT THEY ARE NOT ALWAYS AVAILABLE WHEN THEY ARE AVAILABLE THEY DON’T OME IN EVEN IF THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO WHEN A NURSE IS ASKING THEM TO. SECOND, WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS IT TO MAINTAIN THE CLEANLINESS OF A CELL AND ARE WE ANTICIPATING THAT CELLS IN A MEDICAL BAY, SHOULD HAVE A CERTAIN LEVEL OF CLEANLINESS AS IF IT WERE A HOSPITAL OR A MEDICAL FACILITY? MEDICATION, THE CHALLENGES AROUND DISPATCHING MEDICATION AND A PLACE AS COMPLICATED AS THE JAIL. AND WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE IMPLEMENTED AND LAID UT. AND WHAT WOULD THOSE LOOK LIKE AND WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS THAT TO TRACK THAT AND SURE THAT WE ARE DOING THAT. THE PROTECTION OF HIPAA, AND I THINK THIS IS A COMPLICATED ONE, BECAUSE THERE IS THE LANGUAGE LINES THAT WERE DESCRIBED EARLIER BUT I ALSO THINK THAT IN SOME WAYS WE ARE ASKING CUSTODY STAFF TO AT THIS POINT ACT WITH INMATES WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE A FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR MEDICAL NEEDS. WHICH COULD ACTUALLY BE VERY IMPORTANT AND HOW DO WE — IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE FOR EM THIS TO HAVE. HOW DO WE SHARE DATA THAT’S HIPAA COMPLAINT. BUT THAT DOESN’T PRESUME THERE IS A WE’LL BETWEEN ONE PARTY AND ANOTHER DEPENDING ON THE ROLE THEY ARE PLAYING IN OUR CUSTODY BE ENVIRONMENT. WHEN WE HAVE NEEDS FOR EQUIPMENT WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS IT TO MAKE SURE THE PATIENT HAS ACCESS TO THE EQUIPMENT. AND HOW DOES THAT GET IN AND OUT OF THE FACILITY IN A TIMELY FASHION. AND THEN OVERALL, FROM A MEDICAL PERSPECTIVE, THE — HOW — HOW THE STRUCTURE OF THE MEDICAL WORK CAN BE ALIGNED TO SOME BROADER GOALS. AND IT’S ACTUALLY GOING BACK TO THE POINT THAT SUPERVISOR SIMITIAN RAISED AT THE TOP OF THE DISCUSSION. WHICH IS THE — PART OF THE REASON WE END UP TALKING ABOUT THE DETAILS OF ALL OF THESE THINGS IS VERY SIMPLY THAT WE GET CALLS AND COMPLAINTS, MY OFFICE ND I KNOW ALL OF OUR OFFICES DO ABOUT THINGS HAPPENING IN THE JAIL. AND WE CALL TO GET SOMETHING ADDRESSED NOT ALWAYS RESOLVED TO ANYBODY’S SATISFACTION PER SE BUT TO GET IT ADDRESSED IT’S SOMETIMES VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND OUT WHO — OR EVEN TO GET A RESPONSE, OH, I GOT THIS AND THIS IS WHY WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO IT THIS WAY OR THIS IS WHO IT GOES TO. AND IT MADE ME THINK A QUESTION ABOUT JUST MEDICAL IN YEP. REALLY UNDER YOUR LEADERSHIP AND ALMOST IMMEDIATELY YOU STARTED TO FUND AND REALLY BROUGHT TO THE BOARD IDEAS ABOUT WHAT NEEDED TO BE FUNDED AT WHAT LEVEL AND NOW THAT WE HAVE BEEN IN IT A FEW YEAR OLD, WHERE ARE WE.>>ARE WE WHERE YOU WANTED US TO BE, DR. SMITH? AND WHAT ARE THE GOALS THAT SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE WHAT WE NEED TO BE DOING IN JAIL RELATIVE TO ANY SUBJECT BUT MEDICAL IS NE IN PARTICULAR THAT’S CAUGHT MY ATTENTION. I FEEL LIKE ALL OF THESE ISSUES I HAVE HEARD ABOUT, ALMOST ALL OF THE ISSUES SOMEONE HAS GIVEN ME FEEDBACK ABOUT HOW THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED. AND LITERALLY NONE OF THEM HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED TOLL DATE IN A WAY THAT IT SEEMS LIKE ALL PARTIES SAY, OH, YEAH, WE ARE MOVING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. SO I KNOW THAT’S A LOT. I M HAPPY TO GIVE YOU MY LIST AND ALSO GIVE YOU THE LETTERS THAT WE HAVE GOTTEN BECAUSE I THINK IT MIGHT HELP BUT I AM REALLY INTERESTED IN WHAT SHOULD OUR EXPECTATIONS BE FOR MEDICAL SERVICES, HOW DO WE MEASURE THEM AND KNOW THAT WE ARE ON TRACK.>>WE’LL DO THAT AND DISCUSS THAT IN THE COMMITTEE. I HATE TO EVERYBODY SAY THIS. BUT HOW WOULD THE BOARD FEEL ABOUT ME COMING ACK WAY WELL DAYS TO CHANGE THE AUTHORITY OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS? BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TOLL CHANGE IT RIGHT NOW THE WAY IT’S WRITTEN IN TO ORDINANCE IT’S LIMITED, WHICH SORT OF MAKES IT HARD TO DO ALL OF THE THINGS THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. BUT IT COULD BE CHANGED. AND I AM NOT POLLING THE BOARD, BUT I AM JUST GIVING YOU HEADS UP I MIGHT COME BACK AND ASK FOR THAT.>>WELL, I THINK DR. SMITH, AS YOU — AND IN ALL SINCERITY, BECAUSE NO ONE IS DIVING ON THEIR MICROPHONE –>>JOE IS ABOUT READY –>>I’LL HAVE SOME THOUGHTS IN A MOMENT.>>WHAT I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO SAY IS THAT WE WERE TO TAKE A GIANT STEP BACK FROM ALL OF THE REFORMS THAT WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON NOW FOR I DON’T KNOW HOW MANY YEARS, BUT BUT PRIOR TO THE DEATH OF MICHAEL TYREE, I LITTLE SUPERVISOR SIMITIAN WAS WORKING ON ONE SET OF REFORMS I KNOW SUPERVISE ARE CORTESE WAS WORKING ON ANOTHER AND I ON ANOTHER. AND WE WERE ALL KIND OF PULLING ON WHAT DO WE DO HERE? I GUESS A QUESTION I WOULD ASK AS WE GET THROUGH THIS SET OF REPORTS, I THINK THE QUESTION THAT WE HAVE TO ASK OURSELVES IS WHAT ARE THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES THAT WE ARE TRYING TO MEET AND WHAT’S THE BEST WAY DO IT BECAUSE IN MY MIND, THE CONVERSATION THAT WE HAVE NOT HAD IS OKAY, WE KNOW ON AVERAGE WE HAVE X AMOUNT NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL ISSUES AND ONE THING WE KNOW ABOUT INMATES IS A LOT OF THEM ARE REALLY SICK AND WE GET REALLY UNHEALTHY PEOPLE. WHAT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO THEIR HEALTH AND WHAT’S OUR GOALS? OTHER THING IS REENTRY. LIKE WHAT’S OUR OBJECTIVE FOR RECIDIVISM. WE ARE DOING ALL THESE WORKS IN THE JAILS AND TRAINING AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND MAKE SURE PEOPLE SEE THEIR CHILDREN WHAT SHOULD OUR EXPECTATION BE RELATIVE TO RECIDIVISM. I THINK THOSE BROAD QUESTIONS AND I THINK WHEN JOE WAS SAYING, YOU KNOW, WE ARE GETTING IN TO THE WEEDS AND I KNOW YOU DON’T WANT ME SAYING, HOW MANY DOCTORS AND WHY ISN’T THAT DOCTOR PICKING UP THE PHONE. BUT THAT’S MY METRICS RIGHT NOW FOR WHAT IS OR ISN’T WORKING IN CUSTODY.>>WE’LL DO WHAT YOU SAID AND COME BACK WITH A REPORT. AND TRY TO ADDRESS BOTH YOUR CONCERNS AND PRESIDENT SIMITIAN’S CONCERNS AND — WELL, ACTUALLY THE FULL BOARD’S CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE A BROADER MORE BIG PICTURE POLICY DISCUSSION RATHER THAN LOTS OF DETAILS. SO WE CAN SEE THE FOREST RATHER THAN THE TREES.>>DOESN’T TO RESPOND TO THIS POINT? I ACTUALLY HAVE A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS. NO, I’LL HAVE THOUGHTS I’LL SHARE THEM IN A FEW MINUTES BUT I WANT TO LET YOU FINISH YOUR THOUGHTS, THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR P PATIENCE EARLIER AND THEN TO SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG.>>GREAT, THANK YOU. I WANTED TO ASK ABOUT THE STAFFING AND SAY TWO THINGS, ONE, GOOD JOB GETTING CAUGHT P. I KNOW YOU HAVEN’T ALL EXCELLENT IN A LONG TIE TRYING TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN. WHEN YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT ABOUT A STRATEGY FOR HIRING AHEAD. WHAT DO YOU ANTICIPATE THAT NEED IS? AND PARTICULARLY BECAUSE I SAW THE VACANCY NUMBERS HAD THAT ASTERISK BOUT REQUIREMENTS AND PEOPLE LEAVING SOMETHING WE DON’T ALWAYS HAVE CONTROL OVER.>>ABSOLUTELY. NO, WE’VE — OUR TEAM HAS DONE GREAT JOB WITH GETTING THESE DEPUTIES HIRED. WE ARE CONSTANTLY LOOKING AT OUR VACANCIES AND HAVING TO LOOK AT THAT AND WITH HOW MANY WE HIGHER AND THE ISSUE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AS WE KNOW HOW MANY CAN RETIRE, BUT WHEN HAPPENS, IT’S ANYBODY’S GUESS, THEY DON’T OFTEN ELL US A YEAR IN ADVANCE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE LEAVING US. WITH THE HIRING AHEAD IT WOULD ALLOW A BUFFER N THE SENSE THAT IF WE WERE TO GO OVER THOSE ALLOTTED VACANCIES, THAT IN THE ANTICIPATION OF THOSE RETIREMENTS COMING THAT WE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE WOULDN’T BE WITHOUT A JOB ONCE WE HIRE THEM. I DON’T KNOW IF YOU HAVE COME UP WITH AN AGREEMENT, BUT IS THE IDEA THAT YOU WANT TO BE HIRING 5% AHEAD, OR 10%? YOU ARE STILL IN NEGOTIATION ABOUT HIS THAT? THAT IS CORRECT.>>THERE ARE TWO ISSUES I WANTED TO RAISE RELATIVE TO THAT. I THINK HIRING AHEAD IS SMART. AND THIS IS ONE OF THOSE AREAS. THE SECOND IS I KNOW THAT WE HAVE HAD A BROADER DISCUSSION AROUND ISSUES THAT WOULD MAKE IT EASIER FOR RECRUITMENT AND THE RETENTION OF EMPLOYEES, PARTICULARLY FOLKS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR RAISING THEIR KIDS AND SO I KNOW ONE OF THE ISSUES IS THAT WEARY THINK ESA IS DOING A BROAD STUDY RELATIVE TO CHILDCARE, ONE THING I WANTED TO ASK ALL OF YOU, IS TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU MAKING SURE THAT YOUR EMPLOYEES RESPOND TO WHAT THEY ARE NEEDS ARE RELATIVE TO THAT. AND TWO IN PARTICULAR THAT I AM CONFUSED HOW THEY WOULD WORK. ONE IS OVERNIGHT CHILDCARE FOR PEOPLE WORKING SWING SHIFTS. BUT THE OTHER IS SICK CHILDCARE. AND I KNOW THE CITY OF SAN JOSE TOOK A LOOK A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO AND DIDN’T HAVE MUCH SUCCESS, WE WERE FOCUSED ON PUBLIC SAFETY BECAUSE THEIR HOURS WERE SO WACKY AND WHEN PEOPLE HAVING FOR O COURT AND TESTIFY ALL OF THAT THING. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ARE ENCOURAGING YOUR FOLKS TO GIVE US IDEAS ABOUT THE CHILDCARE IN PARTICULAR IF THAT’S REALLY A CORE NEED WHEN I KNOW THE SHERIFF HAS ASKED US ABOUT, I DON’T KNOW HOW BIG THAT NEED IS RELATIVE TO YOUR ABILITY TO HIRE AND RETAIN.>>ABSOLUTELY.>>THANK YOU. AND THE LAST THING I WANTED TO ASK ABOUT IS THAT WE HAD — I AM VERY INTERESTED IN MAKING SURE THAT THE — THAT WE ARE DOING AS MUCH AS WE CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE HAVING A CONTINUITY OF SERVICES FOR PEOPLE INSIDE THE JAIL AND OUTSIDE THE JAIL. AND I MENTIONED THAT BECAUSE I KNOW WE HAVE A RULE ABOUT WHO CAN AND CAN’T VOLUNTEER IN THE JAILS AND MANY ANOTHER JAILS SAN MATEO, SAN QUENTIN, SANTA CRUZ AND L.A. WILL ALLOW FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD A FELONY CONVICTION IF THEY HAVE CLEARED THE BACKGROUND CHECKS. IF S IT WAS SOMETHING LONG AGO D NOT AS SERIOUS, I GUESS ALL FELL NILS ARE SERIOUS BUT SOMETHING THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO BE A GOOD PEER MENTOR OR TO PROVIDE SERVICES. AND I WONDER IF THAT’S A DISCUSSION THAT YOU ALL HAVE HAD BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD SOME SECURITY ISSUES OR IF IT’S SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL ARE THINKING ABOUT AS IT RELATES TO VOLUNTEERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE JAIL.>>SOUPER VISOR CHAVEZ I’LL TAKE THE FIRST HALF OF THE QUESTION FIRST. SO ONE OF THE PLUSSES ABOUT THE NEW FIRST FIVE CONTRACT IS WE ARE ORKING WITH [ INAUDIBLE ] RESOURCE CENTER TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CURRICULUM THAT WE ARE USING IS COMPATIBLE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE.>>GREAT.>>IF AN INMATE IS RELEASED AND THEY AVE TWO WEEKS LEFT THEY CAN PICK IT UP. THAT’S THE FIRST STEP TOWARDS MOVING THAT’S A FIRST KIND OF CURRICULUM THAT IS IN STONE AND AS FOR THE SECOND PART, WE ARE STILL IN.PROCESS OF INS TRUEING A NEW TWO-YEAR BACKGROUND CLEARANCE PROCESS WITH ALL OF OUR VOLUNTEERS AND CONTRACTORS. AND IT IS FOLLOWING THE STANDARDS THAT YOU OUTLINED. BUT WE CAN ALSO CONTINUE TO TALK WITH COUNTY COUNCIL AND SEE IF THEY HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS.>>RIGHT. AND LET ME E CLEAR, SAFETY IS FIRST. AND I AM NOT TRYING TO COMPROMISE THAT. IT’S REALLY GENUINE QUESTION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT WE ARE MISSING GOOD PROGRAMMING BECAUSE OF IT. I’M REALLY INTERESTED IN YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT. AND THE LAST THING THAT, DID I KNOW THAT WAS MY LAST QUESTION ONE THING I WANTED TO ASK DR. SMITH A AT SOME POINT AS WE ARE LISTENING TO ALL OF THESE REPORTS I KNOW THAT YOU HAVE A PROCESS BASED ON A REFERRAL WE GAVE OF DOING A JAIL STAFFING STUDY AND WHEN THAT WOULD COME BACK IF YOU KNEW. I WANTED TO GIVE I YOU A CHANCE YOU I CHANCE TOFIND THE RIGHT P.>>EARLY FALL, LATE WINTER FOR THAT.>>OH, GOOD, THANK YOU. SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG.>>THANK YOU. I AGREE THAT SOME OF THIS AND CERTAINTY LEVEL OF GRANULAR DETAIL SHOULD FRONT OF PS J.C. AND GLAD TO TAKE THAT ON I WILL NOTE SO MANY OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AND OUR JOB WILL BE SO GREATLY FACILITATED BY HEARING AN OCLEM PERSON AND YOU SAID YOU WILL COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION THE FIRST MEETING IN OCTOBER. I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT AND ALSO ENCOURAGE YOU WITH ALL OF MY HEART TO NOT DELAY BEYOND THAT. LET’S GET THIS PERSON IN PLACE. THAT’S THE EXPERTISE THAT WE WE LACK. AND I THINK — AND WILL HELP US ANSWER A LOT OF OUR QUESTIONS, ALSO HELP TO REALLY MONITOR THE FEEDBACK AND THAT WOULD BE THE PERSON THAT I WOULD THINK TO THEN GO TO WITH A LOT OF THESE CONCERNS. AND ISSUES. SO, AGAIN, JUST STRONG ENCOURAGEMENT TO GET THAT TO US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. AND LET’S MOVE AHEAD.>>THANKS.>>WELL, I — AT ONE LEVEL I THINK THIS ITEM HATS BEEN ALL OVER THE PLACE. AT ANOTHER LEVEL I THINK THAT’S A VERY CONSTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE WHILE IT MAY NOT SEEM TERRIBLY FOCUSED, TO SOME OF YOU, I JOKE THAT EVERY NOW AND AGAIN YOU GO TO A BOARD MEETING AND A CONVERSATION BREAKS OUT. AND I THINK THAT T’S IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE THESE CONVERSATIONS. SO I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT SOME THINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED OVER THE YEARS, BUT TO DR. SMITH’S COMMENT ABOUT THE CHIEF OF CORRECTION POSITION. I WAS WAITING, MR. WILLIAMS, AND YOU HAVE SHOWN GREAT RESTRAINT TODAY NOT LEANING FORWARD TO SAY ANOTHER ISSUE THAT THIS BOARD NEEDS TO CONFRONT IS THE MODEL THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE WHICH FRANKLY WE ARE TREADING WATER OFF. I SEE YOU LEANING IN SO GO AHEAD AND TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY IF YOU LIKE.>>WE DO HAVE A SUNSET DATE ON THE EXISTING ORDINANCE AND MY OFFICE IS PLANNING TO BRING THE JAIL STRUCTURE ITEM BACK BEFORE THE BOARD ALSO IN OCTOBER.>>BECAUSE THE SUNSET DATE IS?>>JANUARY.>>OF?>>2020.>>OKAY. HERE IS MY TAKE. ORGANIZATIONS RUN BEST WHEN THERE ARE CLEAR LINES OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND WE KNOW WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT AND WHO IS ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT. AND WE HAVE FRANKLY OT BEEN IN THAT PLACE SINCE I CAME BACK ON THE BOARD IN JANUARY OF 2013. WE HAVE A SYSTEM THAT CLEARLY PUTS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, QUOTE, RUNNING THE JAILS, IN THE HANDS OF THE LECTED SHERIFF. THAT BEING SAID, WE HAVE A SYSTEM THAT CALLS OUT ACHIEVE OF CORRECTION THAT WOULD SUGGESTS THAT SOMEHOW THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION AS A WHOLE AND THE BOARD AS A WHOLE HAS A ROLE THAT IS GREATER THAN IT REALLY IS BECAUSE THE CHIEF OF CORRECTION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR A RELATIVE HANDFUL OF ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS, LAUNDRY, FOOD SERVICE, ADMINISTRATIVE BOOKING, WAREHOUSING NOT SUGGESTING THOSE ARE UNIMPORTANT ROLES, BUT THEY ARE NOT THE CORE FUNCTION OF A CORRECCORRECTIONAL FACILITY. WE ARE SITTING HERE AS A BOARD HAVING CONVERSATIONS ABOUT ISSUES THAT SHOULD BE RESOLVED, QUITE FRANKLY, BY THE JAIL AND BY THE JAIL’S MANAGEMENT, WHICH IS THE SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT. AND YET HERE WE ARE. NOW, IN FAIRNESS, THERE ARE CERTAIN FUNCTION FUNCTIONS AND CUSTODY HEALTH IS ONE OF THEM AND SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ HAS BEEN ON THE CUSTODY HEALTH ISSUES FOR A LONG TIME, LET MIAC KNOWLEDGE THAT. WHERE THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE CAN RIGHTFULLY AY. WE CAN’T DO EVERYTHING WE ARE SUPPOSED TODAY WITHOUT DIRECT SUPPORT PHOTOGRAPH AGENCY UNDER THE DIRECT PURSUE OF THE SHERIFF. TO MR. WILLIAMS’ POINT WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT WHO IS RUNNING THE JAILS. WHOEVER THAT IS SHOULD BE RUNNING THE JAILS RIGHT NOW. WHEN EVERYBODY IS ACCOUNTABLE NOBODY IS ACCOUNTABLE AND THAT’S KIND OF WHERE WE ARE. I & I FRUSTRATE THAT FROM MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY AS TO WHO THEY SHOULD GOING TO GET RESULTS ON MATTERS OF CONCERN TO THEM. I CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THAT IT IS. I CONTINUE TO BE IT’S NOT A PROMPT RAT TO HAVE ACHIEVE OF CORRECTION WHO REPORTS TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHO IS THE SAME PERSON AS THE UNDER SHERIFF TO REPORTS TO THE SHERIFF. THAT’S NOT A CRITICISM OF THE BOARD OF UPERVISORS OR THE SHERIFF OR UNDER UNDER SHERIFFS OR CHIEF OF CORRECTIONS HOUSE TOUR I CANNILY JUST THINK IT’S A MODEL THAT DOESN’T WORK, TELLING SOMEBODY HI, YOU ARE DIRECT REPORT TO THE BOARD SUPERVISORS AND TO THE SHERIFF, AND IF YOU GET COMPETING DIRECTION FROM THOSE TWO DIFFERENT BOSSES, GOOD LUCK TO YOU. THAT’S JUST NOT A WORKABLE SYSTEM IN MY VIEW AND I HOPE AT SOME POINT WE CAN CONFRONT THAT. WE HAVE STRUGGLED WITH IT. AND MR. WILLIAMS IS REMINDING US THAT BEFORE THE END YEAR WE HAVE TO STRUGGLE WITH IT AGAIN, WE CAN COME TO SOME RESOLUTION, GOOD, BAD, OR OTHERWISE OR WE CAN PUNT YET AGAIN WHICH WILL LEAVE THE ISSUE UNRESOLVED. THE COMMENTS ABOUT THE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT MONITORING IS A TIMELY, SAME WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLICIST I DON’T WANT TO SAY LET’S NOT KID OURSELVES THAT WILL BE THE SOLUTION TO ALL OF THESE PROBLEMS, I DON’T WANT TO OVERLY FREIGHT THAT PARTICULAR ONE. LAST THING, JUST ON ISSUES OF REFORM BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE. MY ENGAGEMENT ON THIS ISSUE JUST FOR THE RECORD, WAS ACTUALLY NOT A FUNCTION F THE TYREE TRAGEDY IT WAS A FUNCTION OF THE FERGUSON CASE. AND I HAVE SAID THIS BEFORE, BUT I WANT TO SAY IT AGAIN ON THE RECORD BECAUSE WE HAVE NEW PARTICIPANTS IN THE ROOM, IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE FERGUSON TRAGEDY, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE AROUND THE COUNTRY EXPRESSED THEIR ANGER AND THEIR SADNESS, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS APPROPRIATE ON BOTH COUNTS BUT I FELT THAT AS ELECT OFFICIALS OUR RESPONSIBILITY WAS TO ASK URSELVES WHAT AN WE DO TANGIBLY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE NEVER HAVE A ERGUSON IN TAN SANTA CLARA COUNTY OR TO COME AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO MAKING SURE THAT WE NEVER HAVE A FERGUSON IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY. AS I DID MY HOMEWORK AND WORKED FOR THE SHERIFF AFTERNOONS OFFICE AMONG OTHERS, CAME AWAY WITH THE CONVICTION THAT THERE WERE THREE THINGS WE NEEDED TO DO. THE FIRST WAS BODY-WORN CAMERAS. WORKED QUITE CLOSELY WITH THE SHERIFF AFTE’S OFFICE WHILE THAS ALWAYS A WORK IN PROGRESS, YOU KNOW, WE GOT THERE AND WE GOT THERE RELATIVELY EXPEDITIOUSLY. THE SECOND WAS IMPLICIT BIAS TRAINING. AGAIN, WORKING WITH THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE E GOT THERE AND GOT THERE RELATIVELY QUICKLY. YOU KNOW, I KNOW THAT WE ARE HAVING TROUBLE MANAGING ALL OF THE TRAINING EXPECTATIONS SO WE HAVE GOT THE ORGANIZATION. BUT THE THIRD WAS, AND REMAINS, MEANINGFUL CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT. AND I FELT THAT IF WE COULD DO THOSE THREE THINGS, THAT OUR CHANCES OF HAVING A FERGUSON IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY WERE DRAMATICALLY EDUCED. I STILL BELIEVE THAT. I AM GLAD WE HAVE ESSENTIALLY GOT TO A GOOD PLACE ON THE FIRST TWO. STILL WORK TO DO. AND THE THIRD ONE IS THE SORT OF FINAL LEG OF THE 3-LEGGED STOOL. WHILE ALL THAT WAS UNDERWAY WE HAD THE TRAGEDY OF MR. TYREE’S MURDER AND THE ISSUE OF JAIL OVERSIGHT AND CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT BECAME MORE PROM NEXT AND I MADE PLAIN AND I THINK EVERYBODY IS IN ALIGNMENT ON THAT. CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT IS ABOUT BOTH THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE OF THE SHERIFF AFTERNOONS DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS THE JAIL SIDE AND SO THAT’S ONE OF THE CHALLENGES FRANKLY IN PUTTING TOGETHER A — AN OFFICE, FINDING FOLKS WHO HAVE THE EXPERTISE OR THE ABILITY TO PULL TOGETHER THE EXPERTISE IN BOTH ARENAS. I AM LOOKING AS WE GO FORWARD ON THIS ISSUE, DR. SMITH, TO GET CLEAR ABOUT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT IN A WAY THAT I THINK HAS BEEN COMPROMISED FRANKLY BY THE NEED FOR JAIL REFORM WORK BY OUR BOARD OVER THE LAST 3 1/2 YEARS I THINK IT’S TIME TO REMEMBER WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT AND HOLD PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE PIECES IF IT’S OUR RESPONSIBILITY AT THE BOARD, GREAT. IF IT’S THE OMMITTEE’S RESPONSIBILITY, GREAT. IF IT’S THE SHERIFF’S RESPONSIBILITY, GREAT. IF IT’S CUSTODY HEALTH OR WHOEVER, GREAT. BUT LET’S I THINK THAT TIME TO SORT OF SAY, LET’S BE CLEAR ABOUT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE OR WHAT. I DO THINK MS. WHAT PENSKE AND DR. SMITH GOING FORWARD HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THE HIGHER-LEVEL CONVERSATIONS. THTHIS IS ABOUT HELPING THE BOAD MAKE GOOD DECISIONS GOING FORWARD. AFTERNOON OF THESE INDIVIDUALS ITEM IS IMPORTANT, IT’S IMPORTANT TO SOMEBODY OR IT WOULDN’T HAVE ENDED UP AND REMAINED ON THE LIST. IF IT’S YOUR LIFE ON THE LINE, THEN IT’S 100 PERCENT IMPORTANT TO YOU. IT’S IMPORTANT TO ASK HOUR WE ARE DOING ON THE LARGER SYSTEMIC ISSUES. I AM PLEASED WE ARE GOING TO ASKING THE SAFETY AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE GOING FORWARD TO TAKE ON MORE OF THE TO O FUNCTION I WILL AND DR. SMITH AND MS. WAPINSKI WORKING WITH OUR VARIOUS COLLEAGUES HERE TO TRY TO MAKE THE FUTURE STUDY SESSIONS — I THINK WE COULD GO DOWN TO TWO A YEAR FRANKLY, BUT IF WE PUT SOME OF THIS WORK IN TO THE COMMITTEE, WHERE I THINK IT IS PROBABLY BEST MANAGED. BUT MAKE THEY ARE MORE SYSTEMIC IN THEIR A PRACTICE A* PREACH. DR. SMITH, DOES THAT SOUND LIKE IT WOULD WORK TO YOU SINCE YOU ARE LEANING IN ON SOMETHING I WILL TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK.>>SURE THAT, WILL WORK.>>ANY OTHER COMMENTS?>>YES. SOME OF YOU ARE AWARE OF THIS SOME ARE NEW TO THE BOARD SO I WOULD LIKE TO GO OVER SOME HISTORY. I WON’T BOW GAC TO ONE EIGHTH 168 YEAR OLDAGO. BUT WHEN THE ELECTORATE VOTED IN TO AN AMENDMENT IN TO SECTION 509 OF THE CHARTER THAT GAVE THE BOARD OF SOUP VOIRERS THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS THE AUTHORITY TO ASSIGN VARIOUS RESPONSIBILITIES THAT WERE PART OF JAIL TO VARIOUS ENTITIES. TACITURNED OUT, WHAT HAPPENS WAS THOSE ASSIGNMENTS ERE DONE BASED ON BINGE HE HAD UNITS, SO THE BUN HE HAD UNITS THAT CONTAINED BADGES, CUSTODY OFFICIALS WERE PLACED UNDER THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE THE ONES THAT DIDN’T WERE PLACED UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. THAT’S WHY WE ENDED UP WITH THIS CRAZY THING OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FOOD SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION AND BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. I STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT WE REEVALUATE THAT. AND BREAK UP THE RESPONSIBILITIES BASED ON FUNCTION. RATHER THAN ON BUDGET UNITS. BECAUSE BUDGET UNIT IS JUST A WAY OF COLLECTING EXPENDITURES. FUNCTION IS THE KIND OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE THAT YOU RE TALKING ABOUT. THAT YOU ARE ALL TALKING ABOUT SO THAT YOU KNOW WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT FUNK. THE WHICH WILL REQUIRE US TO COME BACK TO THE BOARD WITH OPTIONS WHEN WE COME BACK — WHEN COUNT YOU COUNCIL COMES BACK WITH AN ORDINANCE MODIFICATION AND MAYBE WE’LL HAVE MAYBE A COUPLE OF OPTIONS OF CHOICE OF HOW YOU DIVVY UP THE RESPONSIBILITIES. BECAUSE I THINK YOU HAVE ALL HIT THE NAIL VERY SQUARELY ON THE HEAD. THE JAIL IS AN INTENSELY DANGEROUS AND STRESSFUL ENVIRONMENT WHERE EVERYBODY HAS TO WORK TOGETHER. AND THE TEAM FUNCTION, IF IT FALLS APART, CAUSES GREAT DYSFUNCTION RUMBLING THROUGH THE ENTIRE SYSTEM. THIS REFORM THAT WE AVE EMBARKED ON IS MAKING PROGRESS BUT IT’S ALSO MOVING EVERYBODY’S CHEESE AS THEY SAY, SO THAT THERE ARE LOTS OF DISRUPTION GOING ON AND NOW IS A VERY GOOD TIME FOR US TO BE CLEAR ABOUT WHICH FUNCTIONS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO WHICH INDIVIDUALS. SO HOPEFULLY THAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE BOARD.>>IF THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS IF WE CAN GET THE VOTING PANEL ON THE SCREEN I WILL LEAN FORWARD AND MAKE A MOTION TO RECEIVE THE REPORT. IF I CAN GET IT. THERE WE GO. AND WE’LL ALSO DIRECT STAFF TO WORK ON RECONSTITUTING THE STUDY SESSION FORMAT. FOR SUBSEQUENT BOARD MEETINGS AND GOING TO TWO A YEAR RATHER THAN FOUR. AND REFERRING SPECIFIC ITEMS TO AND THROUGH PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE AS APPROPRIATE AND RATHER THAN THINKING OF THOSE S STUDY SESSION OPICS PER SE. I THINK THAT CAPTURES WHERE WE WERE AS A BOARD BUT SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ SINCE YOU ARE THE SECONDER I ANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THAT CHARACTERIZATION.>>YES.>>SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN YOUR MICROPHONE IS ON, SIR.>>THANK YOU, I THINK MOVING FROM FOUR MEETINGS TO TWO HERE AT THE BOARD IS A GOOD MOVE FOR EVERYONE. IT’S AN EXTREMELY IMPORTANT AND COSTLY ISSUE THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH. MAKING GOOD PROGRESS ON THE 623 ITEMS ON THE LIST. IT’S VERY COMPLEX. AND I THINK YOU ARE ALL DOING A GREAT JOB. I WANT TODAY POINT OUT I KNOW HOW IMPORTANT THIS ISSUE IS. TO THE FIVE SUPERVISORS HERE. AND I JUST, IN THE EFFORT OF MINIMIZING DUPLICATION, I LIKE THE IDEA OF GOING TWICE A YEAR HERE AT THE BOARD FOR THESE STUDY SESSIONS. AND I WHAT I HEARD YOU JUST NOW SAY I THOUGHT WAS DIFFERENT AND I LIKED IT BETTER THAN WHAT WAS SAID EARLIER. EARLIER I THOUGHT THE SUGGESTION WAS THAT THIS I GET MOVED TO PS. AND JORGENSEN. THAT WOULD NOT BE BENEFICIAL. IT WOULD BE A DUPLICATION OF TIME. NOW I HEAR YOU SAY FROM FOUR TO TWO AND A COUPLE OF ITEMS TO COMMITTEE FIRST AND THEN FORWARDED TO THE BOARD LITTLE IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE PROPOSING?>>I THINK YOUR RESTATEMENT OF THE SECOND OR LATER VERSION IS CORRECT.>>OKAY.>>WITH TRAPPING ONE MIRROR CLARIFICATION I THINK IT’S MORE THAN A COUPLE OF ITEMS THAT WILL BE COMING TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE, LOOKING AT TODAY’S AGENDA, FOR EXAMPLE, INCLUDING A NUMBER THAT WE ENDED UP PUTTING ON CONSENT, THERE WERE AT LEAST A DOZEN IDEAS JUST TODAY THAT WERE EACH ONE INDIVIDUALLY IMPORTANT IN THE LIVES OF SOME SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PEOPLE. BUT THAT ARE MORE ABOUT IMPLEMENTATION, THAN ABOUT SORT OF LARGER ISSUES. I SHOULD HAVE JUST SAID YES, BUT MORE THAN A COUPLE.>>OKAY, I’LL TAKE BACK THE COUPLE OF WHATEVER THEY ARE THEY ARE. SOME SIX, 16, WHATEVER IT IS. WHAT I AM SAYING IS THIS PARTICULAR ITEM HAS BEEN AN ENORMOUS PASSIONATE, EMOTIONAL, DANGEROUS, FINANCIAL, COMPLEX, MULTI ORGANIZATION, UH, DUH, DUH, DUH, DUH, ISSUES SINCE DAY ONE. WE HAVE A LONG WAYS TO GO WITH THE NEW JAIL GOING TO BE BUILT BESIDES MODIFYING WHAT WE ARE DOING WITH OUR CURRENT FACILITIES. I WANT FOR MAKE SURE WHEN THEY ARE HEARD. YOU EIGHT INDIVIDUALS HERE AND THE TIME OF THE STAFF TO GET HERE AND THE FIVE OF US ARE HERE AND THE MEMBERS FROM THE PUBLIC ARE HERE THAT WE DON’T HAVE DUPLICATION OF ALL OF THIS AT PS & J AND ALL OF THIS AGAIN AT THE BOARD. THINK AND THAT’S ALL I WAS ASKING AS WE CHANGE THE FORMAT OF WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING THE LAST YEAR OR TWO MOVING FORWARD. DONE, THANK OU.>>GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE FIVE VOTES CAST. WE — I AM SORRY. CORTESE –>>JUST A CLARIFICATION.>>PLEASE.>>THAT THE MOTION DIDN’T SPECIFICALLY TALK ABOUT THE EXECEXECUTIVE’S EFFORTS WHICH HE WILL MOVE IN TO A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FORUM BUT I AM ASSUMING SILENCE IN THE MOTION MEANS THAT’S TO CONTINUE, THAT’S JUST ONE ISSUE I HAD BROUGHT UP.>>YEAH, I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING WHAT THE EXECUTIVE COMES BACK WITH.>>GREAT, THANK YOU.>>ALL VOTES HAVE BEEN CAST THINK IT WAS 5-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO EVERYBODY WHO IS THERE. AND PLEASE STAY WITH US IF YOU ARE PART OF THE SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSION ON OTHER JAIL-RELATED ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MADAM CLERK, I BELIEVE THAT ITEMS 23 AND 24 WERE BOTH PLACED ON CONSENT. DO I HAVE THAT RIGHT? THAT BEING SAID ITEM 25 IS STILL ON OUR AGENDA? YES. PLAY PLACEMENT FOR HIGH-NEEDS WOMEN LEAVING COUNTY JAIL. DO WE TURN TO YOU FOR THE INNING TREE ON THIS?>>YES. I WILL ASK THE PANEL TO I WANT INTRODUCE THEMSELVES THIS IS A REVIEW OF HIGH-NEEDS WOMEN IN JAIL DI DEFINED AS HAVING MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE ISSUE AND VIOLENT BAY HALF YOURS AND WHO CYCLE IN AND OUT OF THE JAIL AND PRISON FOR YEARS ON VIOLENT CHARGES. THIS EPORT IS A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT AMONG THE EPARTMENTS YOU SEE HERE TODAY. I WILL ASK THE STAFF TO INTRODUCE THEMSELVES, CHARTING WITH DR. CHILDS.>>I AM HOLY CHILD DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH FOR PROBATION.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, [ INAUDIBLE ] DEPUTY CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER OF A DIFFICULTIES SERVICES.>>GOOD AFTERNOON [ INAUDIBLE ] DIRECTOR OF OFFICER OF REENTRY SERVE.>>IT’S HELD ANY HIM MESS PEREZ SHERIFF’S OFFICE.>>TONY TELLES, DID HE WAVE YOUR HELD.>>NATHAN WELL IDEAS INTERRUPT HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR.>>[ INAUDIBLE ] FLEET. AND TONY FROM THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE.>>THANK YOU. AND BEFORE YOU GO FURTHER, MS. CHILD HAVE YOU APPEARED IN FRONT OF OUR BOARD BEFORE?>>YES, WE WERE MOVING STAFFING AROUND ABOUT WHO WAS COVERING TODAY SO I AM KIND OF A LAST MINUTE.>>I AM SURE OU WILL DO JUST FINE. I COULDN’T REMEMBER IF YOU HAD BEEN IN FRONT OF OUR BOARD BEFORE.>>I HAD BEEN.>>THANK YOU, HOUGHT SO BUT COULDN’T PLACE THE ISSUE OR TACK ARE TAINT OF COURSE. YOU ARE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH FR PROMOTION IS YOUR TITLE?>>CORRECT.>>TAKE IT FROM THERE MS. WAPENSKI.>>PLEASE.>>AND THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DEPARTMENTS ARE HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE IDENTIFIED 26 WOMEN IN CUSTODY WHO MEET THE DEFINITION THAT I JUST DESCRIBED. THE STORIES OF THESE 26 WOMEN ARE VERY SIMILAR. THE SPECIFIC DEMOGRAPHICS AND DATA ARE CONTAINED IN THE REPORT. BUT THERE ARE SIMILARITIES, THEY HAVE SIGNIFICANT MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES AND/OR RAUMA SYMPTOMS, THEY HAVE BEEN IN NUMEROUS TREATMENT ROGRAMS. THEY HAVE THEY FACE CHALLENGES WITH LONG-TERM EMPLOYMENT, BUT ALSO HOUSING AND CONSISTENT TREATMENT SUPPORT. OF THE POPULATION WE STUDIED. 81% ACCESSED MENTAL LEG TREATMENT. 27% ACCESSED SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT. AND 42 HAVE REGISTERED OR BEEN REFERRED TO REENTRY SERVICES. BEFORE WE TAKE QUESTIONS, I WANT TO POINT OUT THE NEXT STEP WILL BE TO USE THESE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS IN THE REPORT TOLLIVER THE REST OF THE REFERRAL, WHICH IS DO COMPLETE AN ASSESSMENT OF APPROPRIATE RELEASE CONDITIONS FOR THESE WELL, PLACEMENTS THAT ARE GENDER RESPONSIVE AND THEN ANY ADDITIONAL RESOURCES THAT MAY NEED TO BE CONSIDERED. SO WITH THAT, THE TEAM WILL TAKE QUESTIONS.>>THIS IS A RESPONSIBLE TO AN ISSUE YOU RACED.>>THAT’S RIGHT. THANK YOU. I WANT TO SAW THANK YOU ND HOW DEEP YOU GOT IN TO UNDERSTANDING THESE WOMEN AND DOING IT IN A WAY THAT APPEARS TO BE RESPECTFUL AND ANONYMOUS WHICH I KNOW IS VERY DIFFICULT TO DO IN THIS BODY OF WORK. THE TWO THINGS I JUST WANT TO RAISE AS QUESTIONS AS THIS COMES BACK TO US, I AM INTERESTED IN UNDERSTANDING — IF WE CAN USE OUR REENTRY PARTNERSHIP TO TRACK WITH ENOUGH SUPPORT THAT WE WOULD ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO USE THIS TO INFORM US ABOUT FUTURE — HOUR WE ORE RESPONSIVE IN THE FUTURE. THE REASON WE PICKED THIS PARTICULAR GROUP OF WOMEN WAS THAT SOME OF THE STAFF THAT WORKED IN THE JAILS WERE RECEIVING A SMALL GROUP OF JUST REPEAT OFFENDERS THAT WERE IN OUR CUSTODY. AND VERY UNCLEAR ABOUT WHAT WAS THE TRIGGER THAT KEPT GETTING THEM BACK IN TO US AND NBA PART BECAUSE THEY ARE ONLY WORKING WITH THEM FOR A REALLY SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. SO I AM JUST INTERESTED IN MAKING SURE THAT AS YOU COME BACK, YOU GIVE SOME THOUGHT TO HOW WE WOULD ASSESS WHAT WOULD INTERVENTIONS WORK AND WHAT INTERVENTIONS DON’T WORK AND IF THAT’S PART OF THE REENTRY OR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH I DON’T HAVE A PREFERENCE OR PROBATION, IT’S JUST A VERY BROAD QUESTION.>>WE CAN BRING THAT BACK WITH THE NEXT STEP.>>AS PART OF IT. AND THEN THE ANOTHER QUESTION I WAS GOING ASK, AS YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE — THIS ROUP OF WELL, I WONDER IF WE HAVE LOOKED AT OTHER LOCAL JAIL FACILITIES TO SEE IF ANYBODY ELSE IS DOING WORK BUILDING THIS PARTICULAR TYPE OF GROUP OF WOMEN AND IF SO, ARE THEY A LITTLE FURTHER AHEAD OF US OR ARE YOU ALL GOING TO BE THE FIRST? OR DO YOU KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT YET?>>I DON’T THINK WE KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. YOU GUYS CAN SPEAK UP. WE CAN BRING THAT INFORMATION BACK.>>THE ONLY OTHER PROJECT THAT WE ARE AWARE OF, BUT MAY NOT FIT UNDER THE CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH-NEEDS WELL, IS A PROJECT IF, THAT WAS PRESENTED TWO YEAR OLD AGO BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. AND WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING SOMETHING SIMILAR WITH WORKING THE OFFICE OF THE WOMEN’S POLICY, PRO GAMES AND THE SHERIFF AFTERNOON OFFICE AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH. CURRENTLY WE HAVE TWO CLIENT NAVIGATION PROVIDERS THAT ARE GETTING REFERRALS THROUGH THE REHAB OFFICERS THROUGH THE SHERIFF AND IDENTIFIED AS WELL, THEN WE CAN TRACK THEM WHEN THEY COME ARE COME TO THE REENTRY CENTER TO SEE WHAT SERVICES THEY ARE SEEING AND INTERVENTION PROGRAMS THEY ARE RECEIVING THROUGH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH BUT WE ARE IN THE PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION AS TO WHAT TYPE OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM WE CAN PROVIDE. THIS SAYS MORE OF A QUESTION FOR YOU, DR. SMITH, AS WE — LAUGH DID YOU HEAR HIM, UT-OH. AS WE HAVE BEEN AS WE HAVE BEEN EXPLORING ALL OF THE SERVICES THAT WE ARE PROVIDING AND ALL OF THE DIFFERENT APPROACHES THAT WE HAVE BEEN TAKING, I KNOW WHAT ISSUE THAT I HAVE RAISED WITH GARY AND WITH YOU IS WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE THE CAPACITY TO USE REAL-TIME TECHNOLOGY TO DETERMINE WHAT SERVICES THAT FOLKS ARE ACCESSING. AND ALSO, IF WE CAN LOOK AT THE WHOLE SET OF SERVICES IF THEIR BECOME — THAT THEY ARE BEING — IF THERE IS A REQUIREMENT FOR SERVESERVICES WHAT THEY ARE AS O WHAT THEY CHOOSE TO DO. WE DON’T KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT DOSE I’M WE ARE BETTING UNDERSTANDING THAT, BUT I AM REALLY INTERESTED IN WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE THE CAPACITY TO COLLECT AGGREGATE DATA THAT HELPS US WITH DECISION MAKING TWO, THREE, FOUR YEARS DOWN THE LINE. AND SO I KNOW THERE ARE A LOT OF DIFFERENT APPS THAT PEOPLE ARE USING THAT ARE SELF REPORTING THAT ARE INTERESTING AND POPPING UP BUT IT WOULD BE NTERESTING TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A TECHNOLOGICAL PARTNERSHIP THAT WE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER, I DON’T KNOW WHAT IT WOULD BE. WITH HE GET PITCHED ON THESE IDEAS ALL THE TIME.>>MORE COMPLEX THAN I CAN GIVE YOU RIGHT NOW. I WONDER IF YOU MIGHT REFER IT TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE FOR US TO GET SOME DETAILS BACK TO THE COMMITTEE ABOUT WHAT OPTIONS THERE ARE AND, YOU KNOW, GO FROM THERE.>>YEAH AND MAYBE IT MAY BE JUST A SCAN OF TALS, LIKE I SAID I KNOW THEY ARE POPPING UP ALL THE TIME. I GOT VISITED BY SOME STANFORD STUDENTS USING CHECK THEY WERE NOT STUDENTS, THEY WERE HUMANA BULLS, BUT SEEMED YOUNG TO NEE.>>HUMANA BULLS.>>BUT THEY HAD SOME INTERESTING TECHNOLOGY THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO DETERMINE WHETHER SOMEONE WOULD WILLINGLY USE IF IT HELPED THEN GET THROUGH A PROCESS, THAT MAY BE TOO BROAD OF QUESTION. IF YOU ARE PITCHED SOMETHING THAT COULD ENHANCE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND WHAT SERVICES ARE BEING USED AND IN REAL TIME I THINK THAT WILL BE SIGNIFICANT FOR US LONG-TERM, THANKS SO FAR THIS IS MOVING IN A REALLY GREAT DIRECTS, THANK YOU.>>THANK YOU. MADAM CLERK, IF YOU COULD POST THE VOTING PANEL ON OUR SCREENS. THAT WOULD ALLOW SUPERVISOR CHÁ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’T WE SIMPLY TAKE THE ITEM UP. SO WHO IS GOING TO PRESENT ON THIS?>>ROGER WILL PRESENT.>>I M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE ITEM HERE.>>I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. AND ONE OF THEM MAY BE FOR THE COUNTY COUNSEL COUNSEL’S OFFICE. SO.>>ON ONE HAND, THE OTHER HAND. ON THE ONE HAND I WAS DELIGHT TODAY SEE THAT THE BID CAME IN. A COUPLE OF HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS BELOW THE ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN OUR EXPERIENCE THE LAST COMPANY YEARS. 25% BELOW THE ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE. ON THE OTHER HAND THAT MAKES ME NERVOUS THAT WE’LL END UP WITH CHANGE ORDERS OR SUPPLEMENTAL WORK ALLOWANCES, IS THAT THE TERM OF ART WE USE AS WE HAVE BEEN OVER THE PAST FEW MONTHS AND I KNOW THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL $200,000 PART OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL WORK ALLOWANCE. HOW CONFIDENT ARE YOU THIS WILL BE A 600,000-DOLLAR PROJECT WHEN THE WORK IS DONE?>>THIS PROJECT WILL PROBABLY HAVE CHALLENGES BECAUSE IT’S AN EXISTING FACILITY AND WE DO NO FROM PAST HISTORY, THAT THERE ARE THINGS THAT SLOW THE PROJECT DOWN WHETHER IT’S ACCESS THE FACILITY OR THINGS THAT PUT THE CONTRACTOR ON HOLD. BECAUSE OF, AGAIN, ACCESS. UNFORESEENS ARE DEFINITELY AN ISSUE WITH HESE TYPE OF FACILITIES. BECAUSE WE DON’T OPEN UP THE WALLS UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR IS IN THERE WE CAN’T FIND THINGS THAT ARE EXISTING THAT MAY BE INCORRECT. THAT WOULD OFFICIALS MAY WANT US TO CORRECT. SO THERE ARE VARIOUS UNKNOWNS ON THIS ONE.>>PUT AGO SIDE THE UNKNOWNS OR A MOMENT. HOW CONFIDENT ARE YOU THAT THE 610,000-DOLLAR BIT REFLECTS THE ACTUAL ACHIEVABLE COST OF DOING THE WORK THAT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED FOR PERFORMANCE?>>I THINK THIS WITH CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE DEALT WITH BEFORE. IT’S A NUMBER THAT HE DOES — THAT HE DOES A LOT OF NUMBERS ARE LOWER. THAN WHAT’S OUT THERE. BUT HE HAS DONE PROJECTS WITHIN THAT TIME FRAME. AND DOLLARS.>>OKAY. THE — I BELIEVE THE INDICATION IS THAT THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED OVER A PERIOD OF HOW MANY DAYS IS IT?>>AT LEAST 40 CALENDAR DAYS.>>240 CALENDAR DAYS THE QUESTION FOR YOU OR COUNTY COUNCIL IS, DO WE HAVE A LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CLAWS SO THAT IF THERE IS A DELAY ON THE WORK, THAT THE — THAT THERE IS SOME INCENTIVE TO GET THE WORK DONE IN A TIMELY FASHION?>>I BELIEVE THERE IS BUT I NEED TO CONFIRM THE DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR YOU, THE DAYS.>>IS THERE ANY REASON WE CAN’T KICK THIS CONTRACT TO THE MEETING TWO WEEKS FROM NOW?>>THE ONLY ISSUE IS THE BIDS EXPIRE ON OCTOBER 10th. IF WE DON’T REWORK THE CONTRACT WE HAVE TO REBID WHICH WE CAN DO.>>WE CAN DO IT TWO WEEKS FROM NOW AND STILL BE WITHIN THE EXPIRATION PERIOD, COULD NOT?>>WE COULD, YES. I WILL ASK THAT THAT’S WHAT WE DO. COLLEAGUES I DID TRY TO GET THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES NUMBER YESTERDAY IT IT WASN’T SOMETHING WE COULD GET ON SHORT NOTICE APPARENTLY I WILL ASK THE COUNTY COUNSEL TO WORK WITH YOU TO WORK ON THIS WITH YOU. AND LET ME TELL YOU WHERE I AM GOING WITH THIS IT. WE ARE ABOUT TO DO A BOAT LOAD OF WORK AT THAT JAIL. AND IT’S A BUSY CONSTRUCTION TIME. I AM NERVE THOUSANDS WE HAVE SOMEBODY WHO HAS COME IN 25% — I AM DELIGHTED ON ONE HAND, AROUND I AM NERVOUS SOMEBODY HAS COME IN 25% BELOW THE ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE AND WHAT I DON’T WANT TO DO IS SUDDENLY DISCOVERING 240 DAYS FROM NOW THAT THE THING IS SITTING THERE UNCOMPLETED AND NO INCENTIVE FOR TIMELY COMPLETION BECAUSE THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISIONS ARE SO MODEST HAT SOMEONE SAYS NO, I CAN MAYBE MORE MONEY BY BEING BUSY HERE THAN I CAN ON YOUR POE DUNK PROJECT HERE AT THE JAIL. WE HAVE HAD THIS PROBLEM WITH OTHER COUNTY PROBLEMS IN THE PAST. WHILE THINGS SIT, SIT, SIT. AND OMEBODY DOES ANOTHER JOB MORE A TRACHEA TIFF TO THEM IN REAL TIME IN TERMS OF DOLLAR AMOUNTS. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO ASK THE CLERK TO PLEASE GIVER US A VOTING PANEL AND I WILL LEAN FORWARD AND MOVE THAT THE ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED TO OUR NEXT MEETING, TWO WEEKS FROM TODAY. AND THAT STAFF BE DIRECT TODAY COME BACK WITH INFORMATION ABOUT THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION AND PROVIDE SOME ASSESSMENT AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION IS SUFFICIENT TO COMPEL TIMELY PERFORMANCE. I AM ALSO GOING TO ASK WHEN YOU COME BACK, THAT YOU COME BACK WITH A PROPOSED REPORTING PROCESS ON THIS ONE LITTLE SMALL PROJECT. TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO THE COSTS. I WILL USE THIS ONE AS MY CASE STUDY. MY HYPOTHETICAL. AND SAY, OKAY, UNEXPECTED THAT’S FAIR ENOUGH. BUT OTHERWISE, ARE WE LOOK AT CHANGE ORDERS OR OTHER THINGS THAT INCREASE THE COST OF THE PROJECT OVER THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. SO I OULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT YOUR THOUGHTS ARE ABOUT HOW WE MIGHT MONITOR THAT. ON JUST THIS ONE PROJECT. MR. WILLIAMS, YOU WERE LEANING IN ON LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND THEN YOU SAT BACK, SHOULD I LEAVE WELL ENOUGH ALONE OR DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT HERE?>>I WAS GOING TO SHARE THAT I AM NFORMED THAT THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION IS $1,700 PER DAY.>>CALENDAR DAY OR BUSINESS DAY OR.>>CALENDAR DAY.>>ALL RIGHT. CAN WE ASK — I STILL WANT TO CONTINUE THE ITEM AND LIKE TO YOU COME BACK AND TALK ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO COMPEL PERFORMANCE ON THE 240 DAYS. THANKS. MOTION IS TO CONTINUE, SECOND FROM CHÁVEZ. COULD WAPENSKI AND HE THE OTHER THREE MEMBERS TO VOTE ON THEIR SCREENS, THANKS. ALL VOTES NOW HAVE BEEN CAST. WE’LL DISPLAY THE RESULTS AND THE RESULTS ARE 5-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, COLLEAGUES THAT TAKES US TO ITEM 29, WHICH I BELIEVE STILL REMAINS ON THE CALENDAR? YES, MADAM CLERK? IT DOES, THANK YOU. AND WHO IS PRESENTING ON THIS ITEM?>>IF I MAY IT WILL BE THE SHERIFF AFTERNOONS OFFICE ALONG WITH PROCUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES SOLUTION STAFF.>>THANK YOU. AND ONCE THEY HAVE PRESENTED, WE WILL WE HAVE ONE PERSON THAT WISHES TO SPEAK, THANK YOU.>>AND WELCOME AND WHO OULD LIKE TO BEGIN?>>I AM ASSISTANTS SHERIFF ERIC TAYLOR AND WITH THE CUSTODY BUREAU WITH MAY FROM SHERIFF’S OFFICE ARE.>>CAPTAIN DAVID SEPULVEDA.>>CAPTAIN TOM AL DURAN.>>MELANIE JIMINEZ PEREZ.>>WE ARE HERE TODAY TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD WE ARE ANXIOUSLY ANTICIPATING STARTING THIS CROSS SO WORK WITH LEGACY TO FORMIZE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND IMELINE THINK INTRODUCING TAB SLEDS AN IMPORTANT PROJECT WE HAVE WORKED TOWARD FOR A LONG TOMORROW. THE GOAL IS TO PROVIDE INMATES WITH ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AND MAKE THE SUBMISSION OF GRIEVANCES ELECTRIC AND TO INCREASE INMATES’ ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND INCREASE THEIR ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH THEIR FAMILY SAYS WE’LL CONTINUE TO UPDATE THE BOARD BOARD ON OUR PROGRESS DURING THE QUARTERLY SESSIONS, THANK YOU FOR ONSIDERING THIS IDEA AND WE ARE HERE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE? MS. WAPENSKI HAVE YOU OR ANY OF THAT YOU ARE TEAM HEARD FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFF ON THIS IDEA? ITEM?>>I HAVE NOT.>>ANYBODY HERE HEARD FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE ON THIS?>>YES. I RECEIVED AN E-MAIL MEMO YESTERDAY FROM MOLLY O’NEAL WHICH I HAD ASSUMED ALL OF OUR BOARD RECEIVED.>>WELL, THAT’S WHY I’M TRYING TO FIND OUT WHO ELSE HAS BEEN IN RECEIPT.>>THEY DO NOTIFY US OF THEIR REPORT AS WELL. AND I TOOK THAT AT THEIR COMMENT.>>OKAY. AND THIS IS THE LETTER DATED THE NINTH. YES. THERE ARE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE DOCUMENT. WOULD ANYBODY ON THE TEAM CARE TO RESPOND TO THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS. BECAUSE IT SAYS, THE RECOMMENDATION IS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH APPROVAL OF THE IDEA, I RECOMMEND THE FOLLOWING. A DISCUSSION DO INSURE A FULL UNDERSTANDING ABOUT HOW JAIL PHONE CALL RECORDING INFORMATION IS SHARED. AND THEN FURTHER DISCUSSION CONSIDERING ACTION OF HOW TABLET COMMUNICATION INFORMATION WILL BE SHARED WITH THIRD PARTIES AND THEN. IF THE BOARD MUFF APPROVE THESE POLICIES AT ITS MEET ON THE GROUND SEPTEMBER 10th AT A MINIMUM THE BOARD SHOULD DIRECT THE SHERIFF TO RETURN OR A MORE ROBUST DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW THE GRAIL PHONE CALL RECORD GOES ARE SHARED ABOUT POSSIBLE PROVISIONS TO THE USE POLICY IN TERMS OF HOW TABLET COMMUNICATION IS SHARED BEFORE THE LEGACY SYSTEM LAUNCHES WHICH I TAKE TO MEAN A REQUEST THAT WE MIGHT TAKE ACTION, BUT BEFORE THIS SYSTEM IS CTUALLY PUT IN TO PLACE, THAT THOSE CONVERSATIONS TAKE PLACE. I SEE SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG’S LIGHT IS ON AND THEN WE’LL GET TO MR. HANSEN IN A MOMENT, THANK YOU.>>THANK YOU. I THINK YOU REFLECTED THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S COMMENTS WELL. IT’S ABOUT, DID YOU WE ARE STILL KIND OF FACING THE SAME CHALLENGE IN THE SAME CIRCLE. WE HAVE TO IMPROVE THE CONTRACT SO THAT THE SHERIFF CAN GET INFORMATION TO ANSWER PEOPLE’S QUESTIONS. THE WE CAN HOLD THE ROLL OUTS OF THE TABLETS BEFORE WE USE THEM BUT WE ARE NOT GETTING THE OFFICERS THAT WE NEED WITHOUT CONVERSATION FROM THE SREP TOUR.>>WHY CAN’T WE GET ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS FROM THE VENDOR WE NEED WHO IS TRYING TO ZEALOUS AN EXPENSIVE PRODUCT. ONE WOULD THINK THAT WE WOULD ASK THESE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PRODUCT BEFORE WE PURCHASED IT. AND GET ANSWERS FROM SOMEONE WHO HAD INCENTIVE TO SALE IT TO US.>>ONE WOULD THINK.>>WHILE WE ARE STILL IN THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS WE ARE WORKING WITH PROCUREMENT WHENEVER WE HAVE HAD A QUESTION FOR THEM THEY PROVIDE THAT TO THE VENTURE DO ARE TO GET US A RESPONSE BACK AND THEY HAVE SCOPED IT OUT IN THEIR RESPONSE, BUT WHAT WE ARE REALLY LOOKING FOR IS TO TEST IT OURSELVES AND TO HAVE OUR DEPUTIES WORKING WITH PHONE CALLS ALREADY TO PUT IT THROUGH MORE ROW TUFT TESTING SO WE KNOW HOW IT WORKS, RIGHT NOW WE ARE RELYING ON PROCUREMENT TO WORK WITH THE VENDOR FOR THEM TO TELL US TO THANK YOU WORKS BUT WE WANT TO SEE IT FOR OURSELVES.>>LET ME ME SAY FIRST THANK YOU FOR EVERYBODY THAT RESPONDED TO THE LIST OF CONCERNS THAT I HAD AT THE LAST MEETING. AND THANK YOU FOR THAT EFFORT. BOARD MEMBERS WILL KNOW WE ONLY GOT THE RESPONSE BACK YESTERDAY. I THINK AT 10:30 IN THE MORNING. BUT, AGAIN, PEOPLE WERE RYING TO RESPOND TO THE THINGS THAT I HAD SPECIFICALLY RAISED ON THE PREVIOUS MEETING. WHERE ARE WE IN TERM OF YOUR TIMELINE. I UNDERSTAND EVERYBODY WANTS THIS THING TO GO. THAT BEING SAID, YOU KNOW, PART OF THE REASON FOR HAVING THIS POLICY IN PLACE IS TO FORCE EXACTLY THESE KINDS OF CONVERSATIONS. THAT SURFACE WHAT MAY BE THE LEGITIMATE COMPETING INTERESTS OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE ORGANIZATION OR THE PUBLIC. SO IN THIS CASE, YOU KNOW, AS MUCH AS IT MAY SEEM LIKE A WRENCH, I AM GLAD THAT WE HAVE HEARD FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER ABOUT BUT WHERE ARE WE IN PROCESS HERE IN TERMS OF TIMELINE AND I DON’T LIKE TO GET JAMMED AS YOU KNOW BY BEING TOLD THAT YOU HAVE TO APPROVE SOMETHING WITHOUT DOING YOUR WORK. BUT WHERE ARE WE?>>AFTERNOON TERESA FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT. IN TERMS OF OUR TIMELINE IF WE CAN FINALIZE THIS DEPARTMENT, TODAY I THINK WE WOULD BE PREPARED TO GET OUR PHONES UP AND RUNNING BY FEBRUARY TO MARCH OF 2020.>>LET ME TRY ASKING THE QUESTION A DIFFERENT WAY. IF WE CAN’T FINALIZE IT TODAY, CANNOT. HOW LONG IS THE BID GOOD FOR?>>THE BID WOULD BE GOOD ONE OF THE ISSUES IS GOING TO BE DISCONNECTING FROM THE CURRENT VENDOR. WHICH WE ORIGINALLY CAME AND WE DID AN AMENDMENT WHICH WOULD TAKE US THROUGH I BELIEVE MARCH. THROUGH MARCH 2020. SO WE HAVE UNTIL THEN AND WE WOULD WANT TIME IN BETWEEN IN ORDER TO US TO MAKE THE CHANGE, I DEARLY THIS WOULD BE THE RIGHT TIME TO APPROVE THIS AND MOVE FORWARD IF WE WANT TODAY MOVE FORWARD BY MARCH 2020 AND AVOID ANOTHER AMENDMENT.>>YES, AND I UNDERSTAND. I HEARD THE WORLD IDEALLY, AND WELCOME TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. IDEAL IS A NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE OR PRACTICABLE. AND WE HAVE SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE FROM THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST, COLLEAGUES, IS THAT WE CONSIDER AND I STILL WANT TO GET O MR. HANSEN BEFORE WE DO, BUT THAT WE CONSIDER REFERRING THIS ISSUE TO THE PUBLICIST SAFETY AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE. WHERE IT MIGHT BE HEARD AT YOUR NEXT MEETING TO SEE IF WE CAN’T GET SOME RESOLUTION ON THE CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER. THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS EXERCISE AS THEY SAY IS TO SORT THIS STUFF OUT BEFORE WE MAKE THE DECISION. TO SPEND PUBLIC FUNDAMENTAL ON SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, THAT HAS EITHER PRIVACY OR DUE PROCESS CON CONSIDERATIONS. WHILE IT MAY M LIKE IT CREATES A LESS LAN THAN IDEAL TIMELINE I THINK IT’S WORKING TO FORCE THESE DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS. BEFORE I GO TO MS. ELLENBERG I WANT TO GO TO MS. HANSEN AND LET HIM COME FORWARD BECAUSE HE HAS A CARD ON THIS ITEM.>>I WITHDRAW MY COMMENT.>>OKAY. ALL RIGHT. MS. ELLENBERG.>>I WOULD BE GLAD TO HEAR THIS ISSUE AT OUR NEXT PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE MEETING. I WANT TO JUST MAKE SURE OUR — ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES ARE AWARE, ALSO THAT ANOTHER PIECE THAT WE ARE WAITING FOR IS THAT WE HAVE IMPLEMENTED OR AGREED TO A POLICY TO UNDER WRITE THE CRAFTS OF JAIL PHONE CALLS. BY INMATES. AND THAT IS ALSO ON HOLD UNTIL WE HAVE THE NEW CONTRACT. BECAUSE WE ARE NOT GOING TO IMPLEMENT THAT WITH THE CURRENT CONTRACT, WHICH IS PROBABLY RUNNING OUT. SO JUST ANOTHER INCENTIVE PIECE THERE, LOTS OF REASONS TO MOVE THIS FORWARD.>>GREAT.>>CAN WITH HE GET A SCREEN ON OUR — EXCUSE ME, VOTING PANEL ON OUR SCREENS PLEASE, I WILL MOVE TO REFER THE ITEM TO PUBLICIST SAFETY AND JUSTICE AND TO REPORT BACK AT THE FIRST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY. BECAUSE EYE LEAGUE DIEHL I WE WOULD BE A ABLE TO MOVE THIS ALONG IN A TIMELY FASHION CONSISTENT WITH THE TRANSITION TIMELINE THAT HAS BEEN DESCRIBED BY STAFF. WE HAVE A MOTION BY SIMITIAN AND A SECOND BY SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG, ALL VOTES HAVE BEEN CAST. WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO PLEASE DISPLAY THE RESULTS, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CARRIES 5-0. SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG IT WON’T SURPRISE YOU BUT CONSISTENT WITH THE BROWN ACT WE’LL FIND A AY TO SHARE SOME ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS FROM OUR OFFICE WITH YOUR COMMITTEE. BETWEEN NOW AND YOUR MEETING AND I SAM SAYING THAT IN PART TO MY STAFF THAT’S HERE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IDEA 30 WHICH IS SUCK VICED INMATE PHONE CALLS. DR. SMITH.>>TRACY HAS TO GIVE YOU BE AN UPDATE BUT I THINK THE ISSUE WAS JUST ADDRESSED BY SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG, SO TRACY, WHY DON’T YOU GIVE A LITTLE IT OF INFORMATION.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, SUPERVISORS I AM TRACY HESS FROM THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE’S OFFICE OF BUDGET ANALYSIS. THE REPORT IN FRONT OF YOU IS IN RESPONSE TO THE AUGUST 27th REQUEST IF A PLAN GOING FORWARD TO IMPLEMENT SUBSIDIZED PHONE CALLS TO THE INMATES IN THE JAILS. WE ARE RECOMMENDING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN 18-MONTH PILOT THAT INCLUDES SEVEN 15-MINUTE PHONE CALL SAYS PER WEEK FOR EACH EN MATE AND RECOMMENDING USING THE INMATE WELFARE FUND TO FUND THE DOST OF THE PHONE CALLS FOR THE PILOT PERIOD. AND TO FUND THE COST OF REPROGRAMMING THE SYSTEM. BASED ON OUR CURRENT JAIL POPULATION AND THE RATES IN THE CONTRACT PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WE ARE EXPECTING THE COST OF THE PHONE CALLS THEMSELVES TO BE $1.5 MILLION A YEAR. AT THIS TIME WE DON’T VAN ESTIMATE OF HOW MUCH THE REPROGRAMMING WILL COST. IF WE DECIDE TO GO FORWARD, AND MAKE THE PROGRAM PERMANENT, WE WILL NEED TO FIND ONGOING FUNDING AS THE INMATE WELFARE FUND WILL NOT AVE ENOUGH FUNDING TO COVER ONGOING EXPENSES. I DO NEED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT IN ORDER TO USE THE INMATE WELFARE FUND FOR THIS PROJECT, THE COUNTY COUNCIL HAS TOLD US THAT WE MAY NEED A BOARD POLICY CHANGE, SO IF YOU APPROVE THIS PLAN GOING FORWARD, THEN WE WILL HAVE FURTHER ISCUSSIONS WITH THEM AND POSSIBLY COME BACK WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE BOARD POLICY. IF Y A PROVE OUR PLAN OUR NEXT STEP WOULD ACTUALLY BEING NEGOTIATING WITH THE VENDOR FOR REPROGRAMMING AND AT THAT TIME WE’LL HAVE A BETTER IDEA OF WHAT THE COST FOR THE REPROGRAMMING WOULD BE AND BE ABLE TO PROVIDE AN IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE, WITH THAT I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>THANK YOU, I NEEDED TO BE CORRECT ODD TWO ITEMS IT SOUND LIKE THIS IS SEPARATE FROM THE LEGACY CONTRACT?>>WE WOULD NEED TO WAIT FOR THE LEGACY CONTRACT TO BE APPROVED.>>WE STILL DO. OKAY. I WAS RIGHT ON THAT PIECE, I ALSO, THOUGH, HOWEVER JUMPED THE GUN AND SUGGESTED THIS POLICY HAD ALREADY BEEN PASSED AND EVIDENTLY WE NEED TO VOTE ON THAT FIRST.>>I TOOK THAT TO BE SORT OF A GOOD KARMA THING THAT YOU WERE TRYING TO SEND OUR WAY. THANK YOU.>>HOPEFUL.>>ANOTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN.>>THANK YOU. I UNDERSTAND IN THE REPORT THE TWO NON 1/2 MILLION COVERED BY THE 3 1/2 MILLION IN THE WELFARE FUND YOU JUST ANSWERED ONE OF MY TWO QUESTIONS, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED COST ONGOING ANNUALLY AND YOU SAID SAID 1 1/2 MILLION IS YOUR ESTIMATE.>>CORRECT.>>AND I ALSO HEARD YOU SAY THAT YOU DON’T ANTICIPATE THE WELFARE FUND HAVING THAT MUCH AVAILABLE TO COVER THAT EACH YEAR, SO WE HAVE TO LOOK FOR ALTERNATIVE SOURCE. WHAT IS THE DELTA, JUST USING ESTIMATES OF 1 1/2 MILLION IN COST VERSUS THE EFFORT MATS FOR UNAPPLIED IWF MONEYS?>>SO CURRENTLY THERE IS APPROXIMATELY $3 MILLION IN THE I.W.F.>>I GOT THAT.>>AS YOU UNDERSTAND, THERE IS NOT ONGOING REVENUE THAT’S REPLENISHING THAT FUND AT THIS TIME.>>THAT’S ZERO, BECAUSE WE HAVE GONE EVERYTHING DOWN TO NO COST TO THE INMATES?>>I UNDERSTAND THERE MAY E A SMALL REVENUE THAT’S OMING IN THERE BUT IT’S ALMOST ZERO.>>OKAY, SO BASICALLY WE ARE LOOKING FOR 1 1/2 MILLION A YEAR FROM AN ALTERNATIVE SOURCE?>>THAT’S CORRECT.>>OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. SO THE RECOMMENDED ACTION IS LOOKING TO IMPROVE THE PLAN RELATED TO UP PRELIMINARYING PHONE CALLS BUT DOES THAT NEED TO BE CONTINGENT UPON ON THE INSIDE BUT I THINK IT IS MORE FINING. IN MANY CASE WARES THAN MIGHT BE READILY APPARENT. OF WE BROKEN UP A PANEL ON THIS TO VOTE I WANT TO CALL IN RON HANSON WHO AS A CARD ON THIS ITEM IS NOT PASS ON THE GROUND THIS ONE, SO COME ON UP.>>THANK YOU, AGAIN I AM RON HANSEN AFFILIATED WITH PACK. FIRST KUDOS FOR TAKING THIS BOLD STEP FORWARD. AS MANY POINTED OUT IN THIS AND OTHER FORUM. SUBIS A DIEDING DETAINEE PHONE CALLS WILL ENABLE STRONGER FAMILY TIES AND REDUCE THE DETAINEE’S SENSE OF ISOLATION IN YALE AND ULTIMATELY REDUCE RECIDIVISM. ONE CAUTION IS THE INNING MADE WELFARE FUND COMMITTEE HA NOT MET SINCE MARCH OF 2717 AND IN THAT MEETING IT REVEALED LESS THAN 1 1/2 MILLION DOLLARS IN ITS ACCOUNT WITH NO CHECK AND I’M SURE INTEREST LONE HAS NOT DUMB THIRD DEGREE BALANCE. I RAISE THIS BECAUSE TODAY’S FILE REPORTS THAT A $3 BILLION BALANCE IS IN THE INMATE WELFARE FUND WHICH WOULD BE USED TO SUBSIDIZE THE PHONE CALL COSTS I WOULD HATE TO SEE PHONE CALL INITIATIVE UNDER CONSIDERATION DERAILED BECAUSE OF INNING TOUGH FUNDS IN THE INMATE WELFARE FUND ACCOUNT. HOWEVER ASSUMING THE BALANCE IS CORRECT. WE AT PACT APPLAUD YOUR INITIATIVE AND YOUR HONOR THE BOARD APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN FROM THE ADMINISTRATION, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>THANK YOU. SUPERVISE ARE THE ENBERG. YOUR MIKE IS STILL ON.>>I AM HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION.>>GREAT THINK SECONDED. WE’LL UP THE PANEL, ASSUME VIPER HE IS ENBERG MAKES THE MOTION, SUPERVISOR SIMITIAN, ME, MAKES THE SECOND. WE HAVE TWO MORE EMBERS, ONE MORE MEMBER, PLEASE VOTE ON YOUR SCREEN. NOW ALL FIVE VOTES HAVE BEEN CAST. THE MOTION SASS CARRIED 5-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MADAM CLERK, I JUST WANT TO CHECK MY OWN NOTES. ITEM 31, THIS IS STILL ON CONCEPT, YES? NO. THANK YOU. AND DID WE ALSO PULL ITEM 33? THANKS, I THOUGHT — I WAS UNSURE. WELCOME.>>THANK YOU. BEFORE YOU TODAY YOU HAVE A REPORT BACK ON ASSESSMENT. COUNTY PROGRAMS RELATED TO FAMILY FINDING AND REUNIFICATION AND ALLEGED TO THE LEG FILE SAY MATRIX. THE BODY OF THE LEDGE FILE CONTAINS INFORMATION ON THE FAMILY INDING PROGRAM EFFORTS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, IN ADDITION WHAT’S NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEDGE FILE WHAT WE JUST WERE ABLE TO OBTAIN FROM L.A. COUNTS IS A A COST ANNUALLY OF THEIR PROGRAM IS ABOUT 1.5 MILLION. UNTIL EMPLOYS APPROXIMATELY 18 RETIRED SOCIAL WORKERS ON A PART-TIME BASIS AND THEY SERVE APPROXIMATELY 200 KIDS AND FAMILIES PER YEAR, WE JUST RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION RECENTLY AND I WANTED O UPDATE THE BOARD ON THAT. SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I WILL TAKE THAT NOW?>>SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ.>>THANK YOU. AND I REAL WASN’T TO THANK YOU FOR YOU REPORT. JUST FOR MY CLERKS PART OF THE REASON I REQUESTED THIS IS WORK THAT WE ARE DOING IN THE SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT IS REALLY SO THAT WE ARE NOT DETAINING CHILDREN IN THE RAKE OR FOSTER CARE SITUATIONS WHEN HEY COULD BE FOSTER BID BY THEIR OWN FAMILY MEMBERS. WHAT’S REALLY INTERESTING ABOUT LOS ANGELES COUNTY IS THAT IT DRAMATICALLY DROPPED THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN THAT THEY HAD THE IDEA WAS SO INTERESTING THE REASON WHY I ASKED REENTRY IS AND WE FIND AMILIES. AND FRANKLY ONE OF THE — SOME OF THE FEEDBACK WE GOT WAS REALLY TOUCHING BECAUSE THEY WERE SAYING THAT OFTEN THEY BURN BRIDGES BUT HAVING SOMEONE BUILD THAT BRIDGE AS PEOPLE ARE COMING OUT MY BE A WAY TO NOT HAVE TO FIND HOUSING ECAUSE THEY CAN LIVE WITH THEIR FAMILY OR GETTING SUPPORT FROM THEIR FAMILY. AND THE OTHER THING I JUST WANT TO SAY IS I FEEL LIKE FROM A PUBLIC PERSPECTIVE, OFTEN WE TALK ABOUT LET’S STRENGTHEN THE FAMILY.>>Reporter: BUT THEN WE ARE INTERVENING WHEN WE MAY NOT NEED TO OR IN A WAY THAT’S NOT COMPLEMENTARY TO A FAMILY.>>Reporter: HERE IS WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO. I WANT TO THANK STAFF VERY MUCH FOR THE REPORT. AND WHAT I WOULD LIKE IS TO ASK STAFF TO COME BASKETBALL IN DECEMBER FOR THE BOARD TO CONSIDERING ESTABLISH FAMILY FINDING REUNIFICATION WHERE A A PRACTICE PRATT ROT. YOU HAVE A GOOD LIST IN FRONT OF US IF I COULD I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR THE SCREEN AND MAKE A MOTION. I NEED A SECOND IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION OR MOTION ON THE FEEDBACK. SEEING NONE, ALL THOSE BUT MIKE WASSERMAN. ABOUT, OH, HE’S BACK. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. THANKS GARE FOYT RESEARCH.>>WITH ALL VOTES CAST THE CLERK WILL DISPLAY THE RESULTS AND INDICATE THE MOTION CARRIES 5-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT TAKES S TO ITEM NUMBER 32. AND I THINK THIS ITEM REMAINS ON CONSENT, SO THAT TAKES TO US ITEM 33. WHICH WAS PULLED BACK ONTO OUR REGULAR AGENDA, REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION AND EXPANSION OF JAIL DIVERSION PROGRAMS. WHO WILL PRESENT ON THAT MS. TELLES ARE YOU IT?>>I AM IT WITH MY TEAM BEHIND ME.>>OKAY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SIT AT THE GROWN UP TABLE WITH YOU OR –>>THEY MIGHT. I MIGHT LET THEM SIT HERE.>>THEY ARE NOT RUSHING, I WILL TELL YOU.>>THEY ARE NOT.>>OKAY. AND INTRODUCE YOURSELVES. SO YOU GET SOME FACE TIME.>>IN ALL SERIOUSNESS THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AND IT IS SOMETIMES HELPFUL FOR US TO GET A BETTER SENSE OF WHO IS WORKING ON THESE VARIOUS EFFORTS, SO WELCOME TO OUR.>>SO TONY TELLES DIRECTOR OF BEHAVIORAL WELL.>>MARGARET DIVISION DIRECTOR [ INAUDIBLE ] SERVICES STKPWHR-FPLS THIS WILL BE YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN HOW TO USE OUR TECH SYSTEM HERE.>>GO AHEAD.>>SAY IT GLEN HI, I AM MARGARET [ INAUDIBLE ] DIVISION DIRECTOR FOR OLDER ADULT SERVICES.>>WELCOME AND THANK YOU.>>GOOD FTERNOON I AM GABBY OLIVEROS THE DIVISION OF DIRECTOR FOR JUSTICE SERVICES.>>THANK YOU.>>SO WE HAVE A BRIEF POWERPOINT IF YOU WANT TO SEE IT.>>CAN I RECOMMEND THAT YOU DO THAT YOU HAVE DONE AMAZING WORK AND PEOPLE OUGHT TO SEE WHERE WE ARE AT.>>GO TO IT.>>I DON’T GO TO IT. I HAVE NEVER DONE IT. IT WAS UP THERE EARLIER. THANK YOU. [ INAUDIBLE ]>>YEAH. [ LAUGHTER ]>>I KNOW IT IS, IT’S VERY NICE WEATHER. HERE WE GO. SO THIS IS A BRIEF POWER POINT ON OUR JAIL DIVERSION SERVICES. WITH SOME DATA TO DO ARE DEMONSTRATE WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING. HERE WE GO. OUR HIGHLIGHTS, WE WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT IN THIS POWER .3 DIFFERENT SERVICES. ONE YOU SAW N THE EARLIER POWER POINT, THIS IS OUR KRUGSUBSTANCE USE WORK THAT IS INSIDE CUSTODY. PROVIDES TRANSITION TO OUTSIDE THE CUSTODY. AND CONNECTS PEOPLE IN TO SERVICES. IT’S BEEN VERY EFFECTIVE. WE HAVE ABOUT A THOUSAND REFERRALS OF THOSE THOUSAND 930 CLIENTS WERE CREENED AND WE HAD ALMOST 800 — 00 CLIENTS IN TO TREATMENT. VERY PROUD OF THAT. WE ALSO COMPLETED THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM ASSESSMENT. AND WE — THE CONSULTANTS ON THAT ONE, PROVIDED A SET OF RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON QUALITATIVE DATA AND INTERVIEWS WITH THE PUBLIC SAFETY PARTNERS. IN ADDITION THEY DID A NATIONAL SEARCH FOR US ON OUR COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT TOOLS. THAT WE’LL BE USING ACROSS THE ADULT AND OLDER ADULT SERVICE AND ALSO TO MENTION, THAT WE LEARNED A LOT ABOUT DATA REQUESTS HERE. AND MET WITH MIGUEL AND ALL OF THE DATA MEETINGS. PRIVACY MEETING AND GOING FORWARD WILL BE WORKING WITH OUR VENDORS SO THAT THEY CAN GET ACCESS TO THE DATA THAT THEY NEED THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE IN THIS PARTICULAR ASSESSMENT. THE MOBILE CRISIS TEAMS ARE UP AND RUNNING. AT THIS POINT WE HAVE SEEN MANY, MANY PEOPLE WE ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, WE HAVE HIRED ADDITIONAL STAFF. AND WE ARE NOW TRAINING ON-CALL STAFF TO PICK UP EVENINGS, NIGHTS AND WEEKENDS SO CLINICAL TEAM HAS EXPANDED AND WE ARE BEING WIDELY USED NOT ONLY BY LAW ENFORCEMENT, BUT BY THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS. MOST OF THE CALLS ARE ABOUT ACCESS TO RESOURCES. WITH A SMALL NUMBER THAT REQUIRE ON SITE MOBILE CRISIS. AND WE HAVE DONE A LOT OF WORK PARTICULARLY WITH THE SAN JOSE PD IN MANY DIFFERENT CASE US SITUATIONS. THIS IS OUR JAIL DIVISION SYSTEMS WE HAVE BEEN TRACKING. WE WANT PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO STAY IN TREATMENT 30 DAYS OR LONGER. WHAT YOU SEE WITH A LOT OF THE PEOPLE COMING OUT OF CUSTODY IS THEY MAY SEE YOU ONCE AND MAY DISAPPEAR, OUR EMPHASIS HAS REALLY BEEN HOW DO WE GET THEM TO STAY IN TO TREATMENT AND TRACK THAT. AND SO WHAT YOU ARE SEEING FROM THE BEGINNING OF OUR SERVICES TO THE THOUSAND 66, EACH YEAR WE ARE SEEING A PRETTY BIG NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT WE ARE ABLE TO KEEP IN TO THESE COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES, AND WE ARE VERY — GABBY AND HER TEAM HAVE DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB WITH THAT.>>EXCUSE ME. THE INTERRUPTION. SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ.>>WHAT IS THE REALISTIC GOAL FOR US IN TERMS OF CLIENT ENGAGEMENT? AND WHAT IS THE TIMELINE THAT YOU USED TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN ABLE TO ENGAGE THE CLIENT?>>I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST WITHIN OF THE BEGINNING ONE OF YOU CAN SPEAK TO THIS LITTLE GABBY YOU MIGHT WANT TO BE BRIEF. WE LOOK TO SEE IF WE CAN KEEP PEOPLE IN TO SERVICES IF THEY SHOW UP. AND THEN BEYOND THAT G.>>BUT IS IT –>>WE DO.>>IS 30 DAYS CONSIDERED ENGAGEMENT. IT DEPENDS ON THE LEN BEING OF THE PROGRAM.>>A LOT OF –>>WHAT’S THE METRIC THAT — I DON’T KNOW IF THERE IS A COMMON METRICS THAT’S USED. WHAT IS THE METRIC WE ARE USING.>>DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THAT?>>WE ARE USING 30 DAYS THAT HAS BEEN KIND MAGIC NUMBER AND WHAT HAS REALLY HELPED US IS WE STARTED ENGAGING EARLY ON IN TO JAIL SO ALL OF OUR PROVIDERS HAVE NOW CLEARANCES TO GO N TO CUSTODY, SO THE ENGAGEMENT STARTS TO PRIOR ACTUALLY RELEASING OUT OF CUSTODY.>>YOU ARE SEEING THE FRUITS OF YOUR LABOR ALREADY?>>DEFINITELY BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN TRENDING UP THE LAST CUP OF YEARS.>>THAT’S GREAT THINK THANKS, GABBY.>>THIS LOOKS A LITTLE BUSY BUT WHAT WE WANTED TO SHOW IS THE CON YUM OF CARE THAT WE ARE DOING WITH JUSTICE SERVICES AND TRYING TO CALL THINGS JUSTICE SERVICES AND NOT CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES. BECAUSE THAT’S STICK THAT TIES TO GO INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE A MENTAL ILLNESS OR SUBSTANCE USE AND HAVE BEEN INSIDE THE JAIL. THIS BASICALLY DEMONSTRATES THE NUMBER OF PROGRAMS THAT WE HAVE, BOTH DIVERSION PROGRAMS. MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES AND ALSO SUBSTANCE ISSUES AND WHAT YOU SEE IN TERMS OF THE LEVEL OF DETAIL IS THAT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT SLOTS, THAT MEANS WE ARE PAYING FOR X AMOUNT OF SLOTS BUT ON THE BOTTOM LINE WHEN YOU SEE THE NUMBER OF CLIENTS SERVED, WE ARE SERVING MANY, MANY PEOPLE UNTIL THESE DIFFERENT PROGRAMS. AND WE ARE SEEING THE NUMBERS CONTINUE TO IMMATERIAL CREASE IN THAT. SO WE HAVE THE ESTIMATED LENGTH OF SERVICE, AND THE NUMBER OF COMPLIANCE THAT WE SERVE. THIS S FOR FISCAL YEAR 19.>>AND THEN JUST TO GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE, SO THAT — WHAT THAT MEANS IS THESE ARE ARE THESE CLIENT DAYS OR INDIVIDUAL UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS ACROSS SPECTRUM. ACROSS THE BOTTOM LIST.>>YES, T UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS ACROSS THE SPECTRUM THE LAST LINE END OF CLIENT SERVE THAT’S THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS THAT WE HAVE ANNUALLY SERVED IN THAT TREATMENT MODALITY.>>GOT IT. SO IF SOMEBODY WAS IN DIVERSION TREATMENT MODALITY COULD THEY ALSO BE IN THE MENTAL HEALTH MODALITY OR SUBSTANCE USE OR NO IN.>>YES, BECAUSE WE HAVE A FLUID CONTINUUM OF CARE EVERYTHING IS BASED THE LEFT OF CARE NEED AND WHAT THE INDIVIDUAL’S NEEDS ARE THEIR TREATMENT PLANS, THEY ARE TRAVEL UP AND DOWN OUR CONTINUUM DEPENDING ON WHAT THEIR SERVICE NEEDS ARE AT THE TIME OR WHAT THEY ARE WILLING TO DISCLOSE, MAYBE THEY START YOU ARE NBA OUR DIVERSION PROGRAM BUT EXPRESS THAT THEY DO ACTUALLY HAVE SOME SUBSTANCE ABUSE NEEDS SO THING CONTINUE DOWN THE CONTINUUM IN TO OUR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM.>>IF WITH LOOKED AT THE ANNUAL NUMBER IF HE HAD AN EQUAL SIGN AT THE END OF THAT ANNUAL CLIENT SERVED, IT WOULD BE WHAT WOULD DO YOU HINK? AND I AM REALLY — THE REASON I AM ASKING, I THINK THE POINT YOU ARE RAISING ABOUT HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CO OCCURRING ISSUES OR MULTIPLE ISSUES, I AM REALLY JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS THE BROAD — WHAT’S THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WE ARE SERVING IRRESPECTIVE OF WHERE THEY FALL ON THE CONTINUUM.>>SO IT’S BASED ON THE LEVEL OF CARE NEEDS. SO LIKE IF YOU LOOK AT OUR INTENSIVE OUT PATIENTS, AN LILLE WE ARE SERVING 173 CLIENTS, SO EVERYTHING IS RESPECTIVE TO THE LEVEL OF CARE THAT THEY ARE IN. ANNUALLY WE SERVE 579 CLIENTS IN THAT LEVEL OF CARE.>>RIGHT THINK BUT IF YOU ARE SAYING THAT A PERSON COULD CAN BE IN MULTIPLE — GETTING SERVICES UNDER MULTIPLE COLUMNS.>>YES.>>WHAT I AM REALLY JUST WANTING TO UNDERSTAND IS WHAT IS THE ACTUAL TOTAL NUMBER OF HUMAN BEINGS THAT GETS SERVED? BECAUSE IT MAKES SENT TO ME THAT SHEA BE COUNTED TWO OR THREE TIMES BASED ON THEIR NOTES. I AM LOOKING FOR THE UNDUPLICATED NUMBER. IN YOU DON’T KNOW IT THAT’S FINE I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE IMPLICATIONS THAT HAVE BOTTOM LINE IS.>>WE’LL SEND OUT A MEMO TO EVERYBODY.>>OKAY. THANK YOU. THIS IS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 WHERE WE ARE DOING EXPANSION, YOU CAN SEE THE NEW PROGRAMS THINK THE MURIEL WRIGHT PROGRAMS THAT COME ON VERY QUICKLY. AND OUR FRIEND ATTA CERTIFICATE TIFF COMMUNITY TREATMENT TEAM AND EXPANSION IN OUR MENTAL HEALTH WORLD AND OUR SUBSTANCE USE WORLD AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF CLIENTS SERVED. THESE ARE ALL BRAND-NEW PROGRAMS, THEY ARE BASED ON THE DATA THAT WE AVE COLLECTED LOOK AT WHO IS COMING OUT OF JAIL. AND WHAT ARE THE NEEDS OF THAT POPULATION. THIS REPRESENTS VERY SIGNIFICANT SERVICE DELIVERY EXPANSION. THIS IS THE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE DEEMED INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL. THERE RE TWO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF CARE THERE. AND WE ARE CURRENTLY WORKING RIGHT NOW WITH OUR COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE CONTRACT TO FINISH THE CONTRACT AND BRING IT TO THE BOARD AND THEN WE HAVE THE PREARREST UNIT WORKING WITH PRETRIAL SERVICES AND REENTRY, WE’LL BE PROVIDING CLINICIANS IN THAT PARTICULAR PROGRAM AND WE ARE ALSO WORKING WITH A COURT ON A SAM IS GRANT AND THAT’S OUR PRESENTATION.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU TO YOU ALL. SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ WOULD THIS BE A GOOD TIME TO ASK THE CLERK FOR OUR VOTING PANEL ON THE SCREEN?>>REQUEST. I WANTED TO MAKE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS, THIS IS AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF WORK THAT SERVICES THAT YOU STOOD UP OVER LAST FEW YEAR OLD AND UP TODAY SAY THANK YOU. AND I ALSO WANT TODAY SAY, ONE THING WE MIGHT WANT TO THINK ABOUT IS HOW WE SHARE THIS WITH THE JAIL, THE REENTRY COMMITTEES, JAIL DIVERSION COMMITTEE, BECAUSE THEY SAW THIS AT THE BEGINNING NOW GETTING A CHANCE TO SEE WHERE YOU BROUGHT IT, I THINK WOULD BE REALLY VALUABLE. THE OTHER THING IS I WANTED TO RAISE WITH HIGH CLERKS IS THAT, WE HAVE BEEN RELYING ON A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COURT AND THE COURTS ARE THINKING ABOUT HOW TO DUPLICATE JUDGE MANLY RIGHT NOW. SO THAT NOT EVERYTHING IS JUST GOING THROUGH JUDGE ANLY’S COURT AND HAT WE HAVE ANOTHER WHOLE COURT AND SO ONE THING THAT I JUST WANT TODAY MAKE SURE I PUT ON REALLY ON THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE’S RADAR IS THAT AS THEY START TO MAKE CHANGES AND PROVIDE SERVICES BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE IMPLICATIONS WOULD BE AND PUSHILY SAFETY I THINK IT WILL HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE REENTRY CENTER AS WELL PARTICULARLY WHERE THEY ARE TRYING TO DIVERT PEOPLE. I THINK TODAY JUST MENTION THAT WE ARE STILL — THERE IS STILL A LOT OF MISUNDERSTANDING ABOUT WHY WE ARE NOT PUTTING PEOPLE IN LOCKED FACILITIES. WHO ARE SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL. AND I RAISE THAT ONLY BECAUSE I THINK AT SOME POINT THE PULL GORD NEEDS TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT THE — WHAT PROGRAMS ARE AVAILABLE AND WHAT PROGRAMS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE REALLY CRITICALLY MENTALLY ILL AND HOW WE ARE SUPPORTING THEM. THERE IS A LEVEL OF IMPATIENCE BEING BUT I THINK IT’S WORTH THE BOARD REVISITING THIS BEFORE WE HAVE ANOTHER MEETING WITH THE CITY OF SAN JOSE OR SOME OTHER GROUP. SENTED TO PUT THAT ON PEOPLE’S RADARS IF IT HASN’T BE ABOUT MOVED I WILL MOVE THE REPORT.>>I HAVE A QUESTION.>>MOTION BY CHÁVEZ.>>THANK YOU SO MUCH. I WANT TO ECHO MY COLLEAGUE’S APPRECIATION FOR THIS TREMENDOUS AND CRITICAL WORK THAT HAS COME SO FAR, IT’S MY UNDERSTANDING THE NEXT STEP OF CREATING THE DIVERSION IS FOR ESA TO BRING THE SALARY ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE BOARD; IS THAT CORRECT?>>YES. AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING.>>THAT WAS NIGH NEXT QUESTION. GLAD WILL SEE IT THEN THIS IS A CRITICAL POSITION TO FILL IN ORDER TO COORDINATE THE SERVICES MORE EFFECTIVELY. THANK YOU SO MUCH.>>YOU ARE WELCOME. THANK YOU. I WANTED TO FOLLOW-UP ON YOUR INQUIRY AND YOU REQUESTED FOR THE INFORMATION TO COME LATER. BUT WHAT IS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCKED FACILITY BETS IN THIS COUNTY FOR ADULTS RIGHT NOW? BALLPARK. IS IT UNDER 50? OVER 50.>>OUTSIDE THE JAIL?>>YES, OUTSIDE THE AIL. OF COURSE.>>WE WANT TO SAY 150 BEDS. BUT I WILL GIVE THE BOARD THE EXACT NUMBER MARGARET MANAGES ALL OF THAT.>>THAT SOUND HIGHER THAN WHAT I WOULD BEEN TOLD BY FOLKS IN OUR SYSTEM, EL CAMINO AND STANFORD, WHICH BASICALLY TOTAL UP TO LESS THAN 100. BUT, AND, AGAIN BEING I’M REFERRED TO LOCKED FACILITIES NOT STEP DOWN OR, YOU KNOW, OTHER FACILITIES. I AM VERY INTERESTED AND I WANT TO SECOND THE INQUIRY THAT SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ IS MAKING REGARDING HOW THAT IMPACTS OUR ABILITY TO DO ALL OF THE REST OF THIS WORK. I DON’T THINK ANYBODY WISHES UPON ANY OTHER HUMAN BEING A LOCKED FACILITY OR MENTAL HEALTH REASONS. BUT WHETHER WE WISH IT OR NOT, SOMETIMES FOR THE SAFETY OF INDIVIDUALS IT’S NECESSARY. THAT SAID, I WANTED TO SAY I APPRECIATE THIS VERY MUCH, THIS WORK, THIS DIVERSION WORK, GIVEN THIS IS WHAT WE CAN DO SHORT OF ACTUALLY BUILDING FACILITIES AND ADDING BEDS. OR TURNING OUR JAILS IN TO FULL-TIME. FULL-ON STEP-DOWN FACILITIES OR MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES, SO I APPRECIATE THIS VERY MUCH. I DIDN’T WANT MY QUESTION TO BE INTERPRETED AS, YOU KNOW, THANKS A LOT BUT WHAT ARE YOU DOING WITH LOCKED FACILITIES. I JUST THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, IN A COUNT CAN I OF 2 MILLION PEOPLE, IF PEOPLE WOULD BE REALISTIC, INCLUDING LAW ENFORCEMENT, KNEW MISS MALL ELECTED OFFICIALS AND OTHERS ABOUT WHAT THE LIMITATIONS REALLY ARE IN TERMS OF PROVIDING FOR FOLKS THAT NEED AT LEAST ON A TEMPORARY BASIS 5150 OR 5152, A LOCKED FACILITY. I DON’T KNOW WHERE WE PUT THEM. I AM GIVING MY INTERPRETATION OF THE CONCLUSION, THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION AHEAD OF TIME. BUT IT’S REALLY IMPORTANT TO HAVE THAT NUMBER AND PUT IT IN JUXTAPOSITION OF NEED WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT YOU COULD BRING BACK ON ANY GIVEN DAY DOES THAT CUT IT. THANK YOU.>>SO WE COULD PULL TOGETHER AFTER OFF-AGENDA FOR YOU. MARGARET HAS ALL THE DATA AND PUT TOGETHER A FLOW CHART THAT WOULD SHOW YOU WITH NEW PROGRAMS WE ARE PUTTING IN PLACE THOSE PROGRAMS ARE DESIGNED TO ALSO TAKE PEOPLE THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN LOCKED FACILITIES. WHO ARE READY TO BE IN TO THE COMMUNITY, WHICH WOULD GIVE US MORE CAPACITY FOR OTHER INDIVIDUALS THAT NEED TO BE IN AN INVOLUNTARY SETTING. WE CAN SHOW THAT TO YOU. WE ARE HAPPY TO DO THAT.>>GREAT, THANK YOU.>>ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE THE REPORT BY CHÁVEZ THE SECOND AGAIN IS SUPERVISOR ELLEN BURLING, WE’LL ASK ALL FIVE MEMBERS TO PLEASE VOTE ON THE SCREEN. AND WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO PLEASE DISPLAY THE RESULTS AND WE’LL ANNOUNCE THAT THAT CARRIES 5-0. THANK YOU AGAIN TO ALL INVOLVED. MADAM CLERK THAT TAKES US NEXT TO. ALL THE WAY TO ITEM 30 A BECAUSE OTHER ITEMS HAVE BEEN DISPENSED WITH. ALL RIGHT. AND I SEE YOU WALKING UP TO PRESENT ON THIS. YES?>>YES. KEALY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SUPPORT TIFF HOUSING HAPPY TO BE ACK HERE THIS AFTERNOON. SORRY THE REPORT CAUSED A LITTLE BIT OF CONCLUSION FUSION SO LET ME TRY TO SUMMARIZE. THROUGH THIS REPORT WE ARE TRYING TO STATE THAT THE ADMINISTRATION RECORDS, RECEIVES, AND THEN RECORDS REPAYMENTS OF LOANS BY FUNDING SOURCE. AND SOMETIMES BY PROGRAM. FOR EXAMPLE THE HOUSING BOUND PWO*PBD SAY FUNDING SOURCE BUT WE HAVE THE FIRST-TIME HO BUYER PROGRAM AND OUR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING LOAN PROGRAM. AS THOSE FUNDS ARE RECEIVED WE INTEND TO RECORD THAT INFORMATION AND WILL PRESENT TO THE BOARD AND PROVIDE TO THE BOARD THE OPPORTUNITY TO DIRECT HOW THOSE FUNDS ARE SORT OF REDISTRIBUTED OR REALLOCATED. A SORT OF — AND PRACTICALLY SPEAKING, THESE CHOICES, THESE RECOMMENDATIONS SORT OF OFFERED BY PROGRAM OR FUNDING SOURCE A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE IS THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND HOME UNDS FOR WHICH WE SORT OF CAPTURE PROGRAM INCOME AND THEN PRESENT TO BOARD THROUGH THE HOUSING COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. AND TO THE BOARD SORT OF EACH SPRING FOR REUSE.>>I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION. WE HAVE LOTS OF DIFFERENT FUNDS AND LOTS OF DIFFERENT PROJECTS, SOME GENERATE PROCEEDS, THAT’S WHY WE HAVE MEMO. AM I TRACKING YOU SO FAR?>>YES.>>OKAY. MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT IF THERE WERE PROCEEDS OVER HERE, FOR THIS KIND OF A PROJECT. THAT THE PROCEEDS WOULD THEN BE USED TO FUND LIKE EFFORTS. FOR THE SAME KINDS OF PROJECTS WITH THE SAME KINDS OF BENEFIT. AND THAT IF THERE WERE PROCEEDS OVER HERE FOR A DIFFERENT KIND OF PROJECT, THAT THE PROCEEDS OVER HERE WOULD BE USED TO FUND SIMILAR KINDS OF PROJECTS WITH SIMILAR KIND OF BENEFITS. MEANING IF WE AD ONE OVER HERE FOR THE SAKE OF DISCUSSION THAT WAS FOR VERY LOW INCOME AND/OR EXTREMELY LOW INCOME PEOPLE WHO WERE EITHER HOMELESS OR AT RISK OF BEING HOMELESS, PROCEEDS THERE WOULD STAY IN THE SAME CATEGORY OF PROJECT. BUT IF THERE WAS ONE OVER HERE THAT WAS FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING FOR THE SAKE OF DISCUSSION, FIRST TIME HOME BUYER, THE PROCEEDS THERE WOULD STAY IN THE SAME PROGRAM AREA FOR LACK OF A MORE TECHNICAL TERM. IS THAT CORRECT OR WRONG?>>NOT REALLY.>>I THINK WE ARE SAYING TO THE BOARD THAT ABSENCE OF ANY SORT OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, WE ARE PROVIDING THE OARD — WE WOULD PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BOARD TO DIRECT HOW THOSE FUNDS ARE USED.>>AND ARE YOU PROVIDE THAT GO OPPORTUNITY IN THE EXPECTATION THAT WE WILL TELL THAT YOU TODAY OR WHEN THOSE PROCEEDS ARRIVE AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE.>>IN THE FUTURE. SO I WILL JUST REMIND MY COLLEAGUES WHEN WE PASSED MEASURE-A THIS WAS AN ITEM THAT I ASKED TO COME BACK TO THE BOARD BECAUSE I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE THIS EXACT DISCUSSION. HERE IS THE TWO ISSUES THAT I WOULD WANT TO RAISE OR MY COLLEAGUES TO THINK ABOUT. ONE IS THAT OF THE $950 MILLION BOND, THE MONEY, MUCH OF THE MONEY HAT WE WOULD GET PAID BACK FROM THE LOANS, WOULD COME FROM THE POT THAT IS THE FOR SALE HOUSING PROJECT, THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM. AND SO WHAT I WAS REALLY INTERESTED IN US TAKING A LOOK AT IS PROJECTING OUT FOR THE WHOLE $950 MILLION BOND, WHAT THE REVENUES MAY BE FROM THE BOND AND FRANKLY NOT EVEN THE BOND IT’S OTHER MONEYS WE ARE INVESTING IN HOUSING AS WELL. LET THE BOARD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEWAL ALL OF THOSE AND GIVE FEEDBACK IN REAL TIME. AND HERE IS THE REASON THAT I AM INTERESTED IN DOING THAT. THE E.L. iPOD OF MONEY EVEN THOUGH IT’S OUR LONGEST POT OF MONEY. IT HAS LESS OPPORTUNITIES TO GROW, IF THAT’S THE CASE THE PARTS OF THE PROGRAM THAT DO GROW THE QUESTION IS SHOULD IT ALL GOING BACK TO TO FORK FORCE HOUSING OR IN IT O OTHER CATEGORYS? I HAVEN’T SEE A CHARTS OF WHAT ALL THE SOURCES ARE AND THE RATES OF RETURN AND PROJECTING IT OVER FIVE, 10, 15 YEARS THAT’S WHAT I AM INTERESTED IN GETTING BACK FROM THE STAFF SO THAT WE HAVE A BETTER OPPORTUNITIES TO BE MAKING DECISIONS THAT ARE HERE AND WE HAVE HAD IT REVIEW, THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE ANTICIPATING, THAT IS WHEN YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT. I GUESS I WOULD REQUEST FURTHER DELINEATION OF WHAT WE THINK THE SOURCES OF FUNDS WOULD BE OVER FIVE, 10, 15, 20 YEARS WITH YOUR BEST JUDGMENT ABOUT WHAT WE SHOULD DO AND WE CAN GIVE YOU FEEDBACK MORE SPECIFICALLY AND SAY MORE SPECIFIC DISCUSSION WITH THE BOARD.>>SUPERVISOR CORTESE YOUR LIGHT SO.>>IF WE ARE NOT MAKING THAT DECISION NOW I DON’T HAVE TO BE TOO IMPASSIONED ABOUT IT PROBABLY. BUT THIS SENTENCE IN THE REPORT THAT STARTS ON PACKAGE — BOTTOM OF PACKAGE PAGE 738 THAT SAYS FOR EXAMPLE, FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS REPAID 1 MILLION THE BOARD MAY DIRECT THAT ALL 1 MILLION, ALL OF IT FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM WHICH WOULD PRIMARILY INCREASE THE AVAILABLE BIT OF SUPPORTIVE E.L.I. HOUSING. I WANT O SAY I AM VEHEMENTLY AGAINST THAT. THE SELLING POINT FOR ME OF DOING A FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM AFTER LOOKING WHAT THEY DID IN NAPA AND ARGUING FOR THAT WHEN WE TOOK UP DELIBERATION HERE IN TERMS OF WHAT THE EXPENDITURE PLAN WOULD BE FOR MEASURE-ACTUAL. WAS THAT WE CAN CREATE A REVOLVING FUND WITH THIS PARTICULAR FUND THAT ESSENTIALLY NOT ONLY COULD GO ON IN PERPETUITY BUT GROW. AND WE HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT POTENTIALLY AT TIMES UP INVESTING OR AUGMENTING THAT FUND WITH OTHER FUNDS, IF NEED BE. UNTIL THAT BE IN THE DISDIRECTION OF THE BOARD TO TAKE SOME OTHER DOLLARS THAT ARE IN BEIN IN COMING. OR THE SALE OF PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE COMES IN OTHER I ON A WITHIN-TIME BASIS AND ACTUALLY AUGMENT THOSE DOLLARS. I THINK IT’S A — THE SECOND — MY SECOND REASONING BESIDES — LET ME FINISH THIS THOUGHT. THE MINUTE YOU TAKE THE MILLION DOLLARS AND PUT IT IN TO PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING IT’S GONE. IT CAN NO LONGER REGENERATE REVENUE FOR THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS PROGRAM OR GENERALLY FUND OR PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING OR ANYTHING ELSE, IT’S GONE. YOU HAVE AKEN THE CORPUS THAT WAS ESSENTIALLY THE ANNUITY FOR THE PROGRAM AND STARTED CANNIBAL EYEING IT. THAT’S MY FIRST OKAY. MY SECOND OBJECTION IS PHILOSOPHICAL. I AM SENT BEING AND I GUESS WE’LL GET TO IT LATER HERE ON ITEM 45, BUT IT SEEMS AS IF OUR LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS, OUR SORT OF OUR UNDERLYING, UNDER TONE OF IDEOLOGY IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE ENTIRE CONTINUUM IS SERVED BY PUTTING EVERY SINGLE THING WE CAN IN TO PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AND IT’S NOT CORRECT. WE HAVE PEOPLE DIEING AND FRIESING OVER AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME THAT IT’S GOING TAKE TO BUILD PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AND A GROWING NUMBER OF THEM, YOU KNOW, IN CREEKS AND UNDER PASSES AND SO FORTH, WITHOUT DOLLARS OF REALLY ANY SIGNIFICANCE TO DEAL WITH THE SHORT-TERM PROBLEM OR A BUCKET OF DOLLARS AND PART OF THE CONTINUUM, CALL IT THE MISSING MIDDLE OR JUST THE LOW INCOME, 20% BELOW MARKET WHICH WE LOST WITH REDEVELOPMENT, IS REALLY NOT SERVED MUCH, YOU KNOW, ANYWHERE BY MEASURE-A. AND SO I LIKE MEASURE-A. I SUPPORTED MEASURE-A I COCHAIR THE CAMPAIGN EX-CERTAINLY FOR MEASURE-A. AND WE HAVEN’T FULLY CHECKED OFF THAT BOX. I THINK IT WOULD BE GOOD TO SAY WE PUT $700 MILLION TO E.L.I., WHAT ARE WE DOING FOR THE REST OF THE CONTINUUM. WE WISH WE HAD 1.4 BILLION FOR E.L.I. NOT SEVEN MILL WRAP ES, BUT WE HAVE OTHER AREAS THAT NEED TO BE FUNDED AND THIS IS ONE OF THEM. THIS FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM AND IT’S ONE THAT IF YOU PLAY YOUR INVESTMENTS CORRECTLY, IN OTHER WORDS, IF YOU COLLECT THESE LOANS, YOU SHOULDN’T — WE, OR YOU, FUTURE BOARD, SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE TAX PAYERS AGAIN AND SAY, WE NEED MONEY OR FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM. THAT’S ONE THING, FOLKS, YOU TOOK CARE OF IT IN 2016, THE MONEY IS COMING IN. WE ARE INVESTING IT OUT, IT COMES IN WITH INTEREST, WE ARE INVESTING IT OUT WE DON’T NEED TO ASK THE TAX PAYERS FOR MY MORE MONEY, AND THAT’S A GOOD THING. SO FOLLOW WHOEVER THE DECISION DOES COME. IF IT’S WITHIN MY TENURE ON THE BOARD, I THINK I WILL STICK TO MY GUNS ON HOW I FEEL ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU.>>OKAY. SUPERVISE ELLENBERG.>>THANK YOU. SUPERVISOR CORTESE I WILL RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH A GOOD CHUNK OF THAT. ALTHOUGH NOT ALL. TO ME, THE MEASURE-A PIECE THAT DEALS WITH THE 1ST-TIME HOME BUYERS, IS ALMOST BONUS AND THE CORE OF COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY IS TO THE VERY MOST VULNERABLE COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHICH IN MY MIND TRANSLATES TO USING EVERY AVAILABLE DOLLAR ONCE WE HAVE COMPLETED OUR OBLIGATION THAT WE PROMISED IN THE BOND TO DO THE FIRST-TIME HOMEOWNERS. IS THAT — IS PRECISELY THE OPPOSITE THAT IT THE INCOME FROM THAT SHOULD BE USED AS LONG AS THERE IS A NEED FOR EVEN L.I. AND V.L.I. HOUSING AND PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING THAT SHOULD BE THE COUNTY’S PRIORITY. WHEN ONE DAY GOD WILLING THERE IS NOT A NEED TO BUILD ADDITIONAL HOUSING THEN ABSOLUTELY USE IT FOR OTHER THINGS, THE MISSING MIDDLE TO ME, IS — WE ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES ENTITY IN THE WORLD RESPONSIBLE FOR HOUSING LITTLE TO ME THE MISSING MIDDLE IS BETTER SERVED BY CITY PARTNERSHIPS, FOR THE WORKING AND MIDDLE CLASS WHO STILL QUALIFY FOR TAX SUBSIDIES, THAT’S THE HOUSING I BELIEVE THAT CITIES SHOULD BE BUILDING. WHERE DO I AGREE WITH YOU, IN PART IS THAT THE FOCUS ON MEASURE OF-A AND THE FOCUS FROM THE COUNTY HAS BEEN ON PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ND YES TO THE EXCLUSION OF ANY KIND OF TEMPORARY INTERIM HOUSING, SHANKS NCAMPMENTS, ANY OTHER PIECES AND I CAN HEAR HOUSING ADVOCATES FROM MY HEAD SAYING BUILD HOUSING, BUILD HOUSING THAT’S THE ONLY WAY TO TRULY ADDRESS THIS. BUT YOU ARE RIGHT IT CERTAINLY IS A CRISIS TO HAVE PEOPLE ON THE STREET AND EOPLE WITH NO PLACE TO BE UNTIL THAT PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING IS BUILT. THE QUESTION IS HOW MUCH CAN THE COUNTY DO, IS THIS A PLACE WHERE WE CAN BETTER SUPPORT COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHERS WHO ARE WORKING ON THAT IMMEDIATE SHORT-TERM TRANSITIONING HOUSING. I THINK THAT’S N OPPORTUNITY THAT WE HAVE NOT YET MAXIMIZED. BUT REALLY, IF WE HAVE A CORE FUNCTION HERE, TOO, — FUNK HERE, IT’S TO INSURE THAT NOBODY IS COMPLETELY UNHOUSED IN OUR COUNTY. AND THOUSANDS THE POPULATION I WANT US TO FOCUS OKAY NOT SUGGESTING THE OTHERS ARE NOT IMPORTANT BUT OTHER ENTITIES CAN ADDRESS THOSE NEEDS.>>I HAVE A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW BUT I WANT TO –>>GO AHEAD.>>THE I THINK IF YOU ASK YOURSELF WHAT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF FUNDS IS, DIFFERENT BOARD MEMBERS WILL HAVE DIFFERENT REACTIONS, FAIR ENOUG. THERE HAS NO REASON FOR BOARD MEMBERS TO RECALL BUT WHEN MEASURE-A CAME TO OUR BOARD AND I SUPPORTED IT. I SUPPORTED IT WITH THE OBSERVATION AT THE TIME I WOULD HAVE BEEN PERFECTLY HAPPY FOR THE FULL 950 MILLION TO BE USED FOR EVEN L.I., V.L.I. FOLKS THAT WERE HOMELESS, BUT ULTIMATELY THERE WAS A DECISION MADE IN DRAFTING THE EASURE THAT NO ORDER TO BRING EVERYBODY ALONG ON THE EFFORT THAT OME PORTION OF THE FUND SAYS WOULD BE USED FOR PORK FORCE AND ARE 1ST-TIME HOME BUYER FUNDING. THAT WAS JUST A PRACTICAL DECISION THAT WAS MADE AT THE TIME. MAYBE IT WAS POLICY, MAYBE IT WAS POLITICS. NOTHING WRONG WITH EITHER ONE OF THOSE BEING A CONSIDERATION THAT’S WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO TO BRING EVERYBODY TOGETHER TO PASS A MEASURE. IT WAS AN EXTRAORDINARY ACCOMPLISHMENT. SO FOR ME, THE REASON I SAID, FUNDS DID HE RIDE OVER HERE STAY OVER HERE AND FUN FUNDS DERIVED STAYED OVER HERE, THAT’S NOT ABOUT A POLICY JUDGMENT ON WHERE THE FUNDS COULD BEST BE SPENT, THAT’S ABOUT KEEPING FAITH WITH THE VOTERS ABOUT SAYING, THIS CHUNK OF DOUGH IS FOR THIS PURPOSE, THIS CHUNK OF DOUGH IS FOR THAT PURPOSE. FORGIVE ME POWER POINT PRESENTATION HERE, MR. LEE. THIS CHUNK OF DOUGH IS FOR THIS PURPOSE AND YOU KNOW WHAT, IF WE GROSS GO SOME MONEY OVER HERE, THEN WE’LL SORT OF STAY HONEST AND TRUE TO WHAT WE SAID THIS CHUNK OF DOUGH WAS FOR AND USE THOSE FUNDS OVER HERE LITTLE BUT IF WE GENERATE MONEY OVER HERE WE’LL STAY INTELLECTUAL I HONEST AND TRUE TO WHAT WE TOLD THE VOTERS THIS CHUNK OF DOUGH IS FOR THIS PURPOSE HERE. FOR ME IT’S MORE ABOUT KEEPING FAITH WITH THE ORIGINAL ALLOCATIONS OF FUNDS.>>I UNDERSTAND SOMEBODY ELSE CAN COME ON LONG AND SAY WELL, THAT’S ALL WELL AND GOOD BUT WE CAN MOVE THE FUNDS TO ANOTHER PURPOSE IF THEY WE THINK THAT’S THE BETTER PLACE TO PUT IT WE SHOULD POUT PUT IT THERE. THAT’S NOT WHERE I AM WE SAID IT WAS FOR THIS AND THAT FOR THAT. AND USE THIS FOR THIS AND THAT FOR THAT THE. THAT’S NOT ABOUT WHAT SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG SAID THIS IS WHERE WE SHOULD PEND THE MONEY. IT’S MORE ABOUT HERE IS WHAT WE TOLD THE VOTERS AND HOW I INTERPRET THAT AND HOW I WOULD MAKE IT FAN FEST YEARS LATER IF WE HAD RESOURCES TO HAVE THIS WONDERFUL DEBATE ABOUT. SOD GOOD NEWS BEFORE I GO BACK TO SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ THE GOOD NEWS IS WE DON’T HAVE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION TODAY.>>LOOK AT HIS FACE.>>ALL ARE YOU ASKING IS THAT WE RECEIVE THE REPORT?>>YES.>>SUPERVISE ARE CHÁVEZ.>>JUST WASH KI DO THIS IT. I WANT TO RECOMMEND ONE OF THE CHALLENGES WITH THE DISCUSSION IS REALLY HAVING THIS DISCUSSION UNDERSTANDING EXACTLY WHAT RESOURCES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AND WE THINK WILL BE AVAILABLE. AND JUST TO AND REALLY IF WE CAN HAVE THAT DISCUSSION IN IN A MORE FULSOME WAY THAT WILL BE MORE HELPFUL IN TERM OF HOW WE MAKE SURE THAT FROM A — FROM ALL OF OUR PERSPECTIVES THAT WE — THAT WE ARE ABLE TO APPROACH AND ADDRESS A ROBLEM. THE THING THAT I WOULD IKE TO RECOMMEND, WHEN YOU BRING SOMETHING BACK TO US, IS THAT THE BOND IS ONE SOURCE OF FUNDS, WE HAVE ALSO USED BOOMERANG FUNDS FOR HOUSING THE CG D.B. FUNDS. ONE OF THE CHALLENGES THAT YOU AND CONSUELOS HAVE IS YOU CAN SEE ALL OF THESE MISSING — I AM SORRY, ALL OF THESE MOVING PARTS AS YOU ARE WORKING N EVERY DEAL. AND WE ARE VOTING ON SPECIFIC LINE ITEM ARE WE GOING FUNDS THIS OR THAT. AND YOU ARE ABLE TO LOOK IN A MORE COMPREHENSIVE WAY. I WOULD JUST SUGGEST THAT WE HAVE ESTIMATES EVENING IF HEY DON’T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE THAT WILL BE VERY IMPORTANT. AND A POINT TO THAT EVEN IF WE LOOK AT THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS 50 MILLION, AT THE TIME THAT WE TOOK THIS TO THE VOTERS WE DIDN’T HAVE A LOAN PROGRAM A TAM TO IT. WE DIDN’T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THAT PROGRAM WOULD LOOK LIKE. I THINK IT’S A FAIR POINT TO RAISE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT WE WOULD CONTINUALLY HAVE MONEY IN ANY SINGLE SECTION OF THAT AND WHETHER OR NOT THE MONEY THAT — SOME PART OF THE MONEY THAT WE HAVE FOR PAYMENTS GOING BACK TO FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER AND HAVE BAG TO E.L.I. OR V.L.I. HOUSING IT’S HARD TO TALK ABOUT RESOURCES WE DON’T UNDERSTAND. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS MOVE THE REPORT BUT WITH THE REQUEST THAT WE DO SOME PROJECTING WITH ALL OF OUR SOURCES OF FUNDS SO THAT WE CAN HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH THE BOARD SOMETIMES IN THE SPRING. SO WE CAN JUST KIND OF GET OUR ARMS AND OUR MINDS AROUND WHAT THE FUTURE OFFERS IF THAT’S — THAT WOULD MY MOTION.>>SO BEFORE A MOTION BY CHÁVEZ. AND A SECOND BY BY BY SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE MOTION.>>THANK YOU, I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU KI.>>YOU ARE STILL A SMALL STAFF DEALING WITH HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY. PEOPLE ASKING FOR IT GOING THROUGH THAT STUFF AND FIVE PEOPLE UP HERE AND SAYING HOW ABOUT THAT, THAT, AND THIS. YOU VERY, VERY CLASSY. BLESS YOU. FOR MY UNDERSTANDING TYING IN TO WHAT SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ SAYS AT THE ENDING FOR INSTANCE WHEN I EXPLAINED TO PEOPLE WHO THIS $950 MILLION WAS PART OF IT A 50 MILLIONTH-TIME HOME BUYERS THEY ASKED ME WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY, YOU KNOW, THEY GO TO SELL THEIR HOME AND THE LOAN IS PAID OFF. I SAID THE MONEY GOES BACK IN TO THE SYSTEM TO BE ELOANED AGAIN. IT WASN’T US PASS THIS BOND MEASURE WE LOAN OUT MONEY, THREE, FOUR YEARS LATER THEY SELL THE HOUSE AND THEY PAY US BACK WE PUT IT IN THE GENERALLY FUND, THAT WASN’T MY UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THINGS WERE EITHER. AGAIN THEY ARE JUST SUPERFICIAL WE DON’T MO WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IN DETAILS. THE IDEA OF KEEPING THE PROGRAM GOING, REGENERATING, REINVESTING BACK IN TO IT SO WE CAN KEEP ONGOING AND I HOPE ULTIMATELY IT’S NOT $950 MILLION THIS COUNTY PUTS TOWARDS E LI AND VLI. IT’S A BILLION AND A HALF DOLLARS, WHAT HAVE IT IS. I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE COST F MONEY WILL BE THE NEXT TIME WE HAVE TO DO A TRANCHE. I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE COST OF BUILDINGS TO BUILD OR TO BUY WILL BE. IF ANOTHER RECEPTION WILL COME OR THE BOOM WILL CONTINUE ALL OF THOSE THINGS ARE OUT OF OUR CONTROL. I WANT TODAY SAY THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO. AND MAKING SURE THAT THE MONEY THAT WE ARE SPENDING IS BEING SPENT THE WAY THE BALLOT MEASURE SAID IT WOULD BE SPENT AND GETTING THAT OUT THERE. AND WE ARE HELPING. THE SINGLE MOST FRUSTRATING THING TO ME ABOUT ALL OF THIS IS PROVIDING HOUSING FOR 5,000 PEOPLE OVER FOUR YEARS. AND 5,000 MORE PEOPLE BECAME HOMELESS, IT’S A NEVER-ENDING, SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG’S COMMENT IT’S NOT GOING TO END ACCOUNT I HOPE THAT WE CAN GET DOWN A NUMBER OF MORE REPRESENTATIVE OF PERHAPS OUR POPULATION COMPARED TO OTHER PLACES WHERE IT’S X% OF OUR POPULATION, AND NOT SEVERAL Xs. SO I LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR REPORTING BACK WITH IDEAS AND OPTIONS OR THIS BOARD TO CONSIDER. THANK YOU. THE.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH WE’LL ASK ALL MEMBERS TO VOTE ON THE SCREEN. ALL VOTES HAVE BEEN CAST WE’LL ASK THE CLERK TO PLEASE DISPLAY THE RESULTS. WE HAVE A VOTE OF 4-1. AND THAT IS FOUR IN FAVOR, ONE AGAINST. THE NO VOTE IS FOR SOUP VISOR SP SUPERVISOR CORTESE AND WE’LL LACK TO YOU, KI AND SAY GOOD LUCK MAKING SENSE OUT OF THAT. OKAY. WE’LL TRY AND SEE IF WE CAN FIND A CONSENSUS WHEN YOU COME BACK WITH SOME DATA. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM AND MADAM CLERK, THANK YOU, THAT TAKES US ALL TO NUMBER 42. WE HAVE COUNTY GOALS FOR ENVIRONMENT STEWARDSHIP FOR PROTECTION OF STREAMS AND PIE MARIAN CORRIDORS. 42, A IS TO RECEIVE THE 40 AND “B” IS THE GOAL NUMBER 12. DEVELOP PROGRAMS AND VOLUNTEER SERVICES THAT PRO MODE LOCAL STEWARDSHIP AND TRY BARE ARE PERRIEN CORRIDORS. AND COMPATIBLE USE OF STREAMS AND TRY PERRIEN CORRIDORS. IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ON THIS. NO. YOU HAVE A FAVE RAN MOWING FROM SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG AND A SECOND FROM WHICHEVER HE IS WHAT DO YOU WANT TO KNOW TO CLOSE THE DEAL?>>SUSAN GILBERT MILLER DIRECTOR OF SUSTAINABILITY. I HAVE WITH ME FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION.>>DON RICHARDS DIRECTOR OF PARKED AND REX LAYING.>>AND VANESSA DÍAZ CLEAN WATER WITH CONSUMER ENVIRONMENT THE PROTECTION AGENCY.>>A LOT OF TALENT. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?>>COMMENTS, PLEASE THE COUNTY WORKED SO DILIGENTLY ON THIS AND OUR CONSUMER AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY LED BY JOE. DID AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF WORK IN COORDINATION TO CRAFT THIS. THEY COLLABORATED WITH VALLEY WATER AND FRIENDS OF STEPHENS CREEK TRAIL THIS WAS A TRULY EFFORT TO PRODUCE GOOD PUBLICIST POLICY. SO TO ALL OF THOSE INVOLVED, THANK YOU. AS I SAID DURING MY REFERRAL, DISCUSSION IN MAY, CALIFORNIA HAS RECOGNIZED FOR DECADES HE IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING STREAMS AND RAY PAIR JANUARY CORRIDORS FOR PUBLIC USES. BY THE COUNTY TAKING THESE STEPS WE CAN PROVIDE EDUCATION AND RECREATIONAL SAUCES FOR OUR RESIDENTS TO MORE FULLY ENJOY RENATURAL RESOURCES WHICH IN TURN WOULD AID OUR GOALS OF PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION AND I HOPE TO HAVE MY COLLEAGUES’ SUPPORT TODAY. natural resources which in tur 5-50 VOTE IN SUPPORT.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT TAKES US TO. ITEM 45.>>I’LL JUMP IN ON THIS.>>OKAY, WE HAVE FOUR SPEAKERS ON THE ITEM AS WELL. BUT GO AHEAD. DR. SMITH.>>I WAS HOPEFUL THAT THE BOARD WOULD PUT THIS ITEM OVER UNTIL THE 24TH. PRIMARILY BECAUSE I SPOKE WITH THE AUTHOR OF SB5, JIM BELL, ON FRIDAY AFTER THE AGENDA HAD BEEN POSTED AND ALL OF THE TRANSMITTAL HAD BEEN DONE, AND HE GAVE ME SOME INSIGHT IN TO HIS BILL AND HIS THINKING ABOUT THE BILL. AND I WAS HOPEFUL TO BE ABLE TO MODIFY THE TRANSMITTAL AND COME BACK ON THE 24TH. HOWEVER, IF THE BOARD WANTS TO MOVE AHEAD ON IT, WE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COLLEAGUES, I THINK THIS ITEM WAS ORIGINALLY BROUGHT BOUT TO US BY SUPERVISOR CORTESE, WAS IT NOT?>>I HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH DISCUSSING IT TODAY. IT’S A WEDGE FILE COMING FROM THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SIDE OF THINGS BUT WE HAVE BEEN ENCOURAGING IT ALONG. THE TIMING AS I UNDERSTAND IT FROM HEARING FROM SENATOR BILL STAFF AND MYSELF, I HAD A CHANCE TO TELL THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ABOUT THIS LAST WEEK IS SUCH THAT I FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO TAKE A POSITION ON THIS. NOW. AND I AM PREPARED TO MOVE A SUPPORT POSITION. I DO THINK DIALOGUE SHOULD CONTINUE. THERE IS OBVIOUSLY BEEN SOME ALREADY IN THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE WAS TALKING ABOUT THAT. I ELIEVE COUNTY COUNCIL HAS PARTICIPARTICIPATED EITHER DIRET ALREADY ON INDIRECTLY AS HAS OUR LEGISLATIVE MANAGER. THERE ARE SEVERAL KIND OF GETTING DOWN TO THE BRASS TACKS IF YOU WILL, THERE ARE DETAILS THAT CAN BE DISCUSSES HERE. DEPENDING ON WHETHER THERE ARE ANY ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS. BUT ON PACKAGE PAGE 880. ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT STATEMENTS IS THERE ARE NO DIRECT FISCAL IMPACT TO THE COUNTY FROM THIS BILL. IF YOU LOOK AT THE BACK UNDER TRANSMISSION NOT THAT I ALWAYS AGREE WITH C SACK OR THE LEAGUE OF CITIES AND I KNOW THIS BILL COULD BE VIEWED AS PERHAPS A NUMBER OF OUR PARTNERS IN TERMS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOLMES WORK THAT WE TALKED ABOUT IN THE LAST ITEM ARE BEHIND THE BILL. I AM ALL FOR SEEING A CONTINUING DIALOGUE WITH BASICALLY THE SENATOR WHO WENT THIS COUNTY AND A MAJOR SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATOR IN OUR OWN DELEGATION WHO, YOU KNOW, IS TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, TO GO THROUGH THE REMINDER OF THE LEGAL SLATE I HAVE PROCESS SAYING THAT HE HAS HUNDRED OWES OWN HOME COUNTY’S SUPPORT ON A BILL THAT HE’S WORKED VERY, VERY HARD TO TRY TO MEET US HALFWAY ON. I GUESS IS ONE WAY TO PUT IT IN TERMS OF AMENDMENTS. AND OBVIOUSLY, AGAIN BEING I APPRECIATE THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE REACHING OUT TO HIM, BUT I THINK THE REPORT BACK IS THERE IS A CONTINUING WILLINGNESS TO TALK. JONATHAN PEREZ, I DON’T KNOW IF HE’S HERE TODAY, BUT FROM CEPTOR BILL’S OFFICE APPROACHED ME RECENTLY, AND INDICATED THAT THE TIMING S SUCH THAT WAITING UNTIL THE 24TH COULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO CEPTOR BILL AND THE OTHER AUTHORS IN MATERIALS OF TRYING TO CONTINUE TO MOVE THIS BILLABONG. I UNDERSTAND THERE ARE OPPONENTS TOO. AND SOME OF THEM ARE PEOPLE WHO I LISTEN TO VERY CAREFULLY. PROBABLY CONCERNS ABOUT FUNDS BEING USED AND WHETHER THEY WILL BE FULLY BACKFILLED AS THE BILL SAYS, I AM SURE THERE IS SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT HERE. THE ONE THING I DON’T WANT TO, AGAIN, I AM HOPING TO PERSUADE US AS A BOARD UPERVISOR TO THE EXTENT IT’S NECESSARY IS TO NOT BE SO CONCERNED ABOUT THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, 50% OF THE PROCEEDS THAT WOULD BE IDENTIFIED, THE PROGRAM FUNDS FOR THIS BILL, WOULD BE USED TO COP INSTRUCT AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND NOT MORE. NOT 100 PERCENT, OR, YOU KNOW, MAYBE THE WAY THIS IS REALLY WRITTEN IT’S ALMOST AS WE ARE SAYING, YOU KNOW, IT’S TOO BAD THAT PARKS, YOU KNOW, TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION, CAN BE PAID FOR WITH A BILL AS WELL. WITH THESE FUNDS, IN REAL LIFE, I THINK THE PROBLEM OF ENTITLING HOUSING BEING EVERYBODY HOUSING THAT EVEN PERMANENT SUPPORT OF HOUSING SORT OF THE GARDEN STYLE APARTMENTS THAT WE ARE DOING UNDER THE AMERICAN OUR-A PROGRAM, REQUIRE INNING FROM STRUCTURE, THEY REQUIRE OFF-SIDE IMPROVEMENTS. SOMETIMES MUNICIPALITIES ARE REQUIRING PARK SPACE TO BE DEDICATED AURA WIRED. SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE IS — WE COULD DEBATE ALL DAY LONG, WHAT — WHETHER THERE IS A HIGHER SET OF PRIORITIES THAT COULD BE LAID OUT IN THE BILL. BUT I DO THINK THAT THERE IS SOMETHING TO BE SAID FOR THE FACT THAT YOU KNOW, OUR SENATOR, FORMER COUNTY SUPERVISOR ON THIS BOARD FOR 12 YEAR OLD, AUTHORED A BILL THAT IS TRYING TO PICK UP A GREAT DEAL OF NEED IN AN AREA RIGHT NOW INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING WHERE IT’S PRETTY HARD TO MAK MAKE A MISTAKE, AND I WAO GET CREDIT TO THE GOOD FOLKS IN PORTLAND I VISITED, I KNOW, 15 YEARS AGO. WHO WERE LEADING THE NATION IN TERMS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND FELT THEY WERE FACING A CRISIS IN TERMS OF THE NEED TO TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND WHEN ASKED WHAT THEIR PHILOSOPHY WAS, THEY SAID IT IT’S PRETTY HARD TO MAKE A MISTAKE RIGHT NOW IN TERMS OF FUNDING INVESTMENT IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA. SO IF I THOUGHT THE BILL HAD SOMETHING FATAL IN IT FOR US OR WAS GOING TO COST US MONEY OR WAS GOING TO SIGNIFICANTLY CREATE ISSUES OR PROBLEMS FOR US, YOU KNOW, I SUPPOSE I WON’T BE ABLE TO GIVE SENATOR BILL AND McGWIRE AND THE OTHERS BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. BUT I THINK THEY HAVE TAKEN GOOD STAB AT STEPPING FORWARD AND TRYING TO ADDRESS ANOTHER PIECE OF THE HOUSING CRISIS RIGHT NOW. AND FRANKLY, HAVING CERTAINED ON THE COST STEERING COMMITTEE. THIS, LANGUAGE IN HERE IS, YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY NOT ANYWHERE NEAR AS BOLD AS SOME OF THEERS THAT CAME OUT OF OUR OWN EGION IN TERMS OF INTERESTING THIS KIND OF WORK TO BE DONE. IT’S ACTUALLY A LITTLE BIT MILD IN THAT REGARD. SO THAT’S ME, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE ITEM AT SOME POINT PRESS SIMITIAN AND SEE IF WE HAVE THREE VOTES TO AKE A SUPPORT POSITION AND IF WE DON’T, THEN WE’LL SEE WHERE GOES FROM THERE.>>SURE. WE’LL PUT THE VOTING PANEL. SUPERVISOR CORTESE IF YOU WANT TO LEAN FORWARD AND MAKE THE POSITION.>>I AM SORRY.>>THERE IS A SECOND FROM SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ. AND I HAVE ANOTHER APPROACH I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND IN A MINUTE. BUT I WANT TO HEAR FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, COLLEAGUES BEFORE I COME BACK TO YOU ALL, COULD WE GO TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND I AM GOING TO DO SOMETHING I NEVER DO WHICH IS GOING TO MAKE A CONSCIOUS DECISION TO TAKE ONE CARD AND PUT IT AT THE BACK OF THE FOUR AND THAT’S FROM JONATHAN PEREZ WHO IS FROM SUPERVISOR B BELL’S OFFICE BECAE I WANT TO GIVE YOU THE LAST WORD AND I WANT YOU AT THE MICROPHONE SO IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SLEDGE SOLUTION YOU WILL BE THERE. WITH THAT HAPPENING HE CLERK HANDS THIS EM TO ME AND I TAKE THEM AS THEY COME. THAT MEANS THAT WE GO TO OSCAR CASTRO AND THEN ALEXANDER, AND THEN INNING VERDE. THE FOURTH AND FINAL CARD IS FROM MR. PEREZ. COME ON UP.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, PRESIDENT SYMPTOM AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD I AL POLICY ASSOCIATE WITH SILICON VALLEY AT HOME THINK WE COMMENT TODAY ON BEHALF OF OUR MEMBERSHIP IN SUPPORT OF SB5. WHICH WILL ESTABLISH AFFORDABLE HOUSING MINUTE TIE INVESTMENT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT THE LOCAL LEVEL 202020-2029, IT’S ESTIMATE TODAY GENERATE UP TO $3 BILLION FOR HOUSING AT THE LOCAL LEFT AFTER 2029 IT’S ESTIMATE TODAY RAID $2 BILLION ANNUALLY FOR UP 230 YEARS WHICH FULLY IMPLEMENTED THE REVENUES RAISED ARE DESPERATE HAD I NEEDED AS LOCAL OVERNMENTS STRUGGLE TO IDENTIFY AND SECURE ADDITIONAL FINANCING RESOURCES TO DEVELOP HOUSING IN THEIR JURISDICTIONS IT WILL ASSIST LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Y PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE REVENUE STREAMS, INVESTMENT PLANS, PROPERTY TAX AND MUST USE 50% OF THE REVENUE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND FURTHER PRIORITIZE HOUSING FOR LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS WE APPRECIATE YOUR LEADERSHIP AND WILLINGNESS TO BRING FORWARD YOUR SOLUTIONS AND WE URGE THE BOARD TO START SB5. THANK YOU SO MUCH.>>THANK YOU. ALEXANDER YOU ARE THE NEXT SPEAKER. VERDE, YOU ARE THE NEXT SPEAKER.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, PRESIDENT SYMPTOM, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. AGAIN, MY NAME IS VON VILLA VERDE FROM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS USA ON BEHALF OF WORKING PARTNERSHIPS I ENCOURAGE THE BOARD TO SUPPORT SB5 WE BELIEVE IT OFFER A MUCH-NEEDED TOOL TO SAD CALIFORNIA’S HOUSING AFFORDABILITY CRISIS AMONG OTHER BENEFITS IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO FURTHER THE STATE’S SUSTAINABILITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS THROUGH SUPPORTING LOCAL EFFORTS TO PROMOTE INNING FILL AND TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND CREATE FAMILY-SUSTAINING JOBS. THE DISSOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT EXACTLY HAS LEFT A GAP THAT HAS QUESTION TO BE ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED HERE TO SILICON VALLEY REDEVELOPMENT HOP HELP TODAY BUILD THOUSANDS OF UNITS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING NOW THE LOSS OF THIS IS COINCIDED WITH THE HOUSING CRISIS WITH FAR TOO MANY WORKING FAMILIES TO MAKE DIFFICULT DECISIONS WHETHER TO LEAVE THEIR COMMUNITIES LIVE IN VEHICLES OR CRAM IN TO UNHEALTHY OVERCROWDED HOUSING SITUATIONS SB5 WOULD PROVIDE MUCH-NEEDED RES RESOURCES FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING, NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION AND OTHER NECESSARY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. BY REQUIRING THAT 50% OF FUNDS BEING USED TO CONSTRUCT WORKFORCE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING IT PLACES DUE EMPHASIS ON ALLEVIATING OUR STATE’S HOUSING CRUNCH. SB5’S URGENCY CANNOT BE OVERSTATED AT THE COMMUNITIES COP FRONT A HOUSING AFFORDABILITY CRISIS AND EACH DAY MORE AND MORE FAMILIES STRUGGLE TO MAKE ENDS MEET THE QUESTION BECOMES WHETHER CALIFORNIA CAN AFFORD NOT TO ADAPT THE MEASURE, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO SUPPORT SB5. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>THANK YOU. NOW, MR. PEREZ. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>>GOOD AFTERNOON, THANK YOU SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF ACCEPT TORE JILL BELLY REQUEST OUNTY CONSIDER SEPARATE BILL SB5. IT’S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE STATE TO CREATE PARTNERSHIPS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND TACKLING OUR STATEWIDE HOUSING CRISIS. WITHOUT IMPACTING COUNTY OR EDUCATION DOLLARS.>>Reporter: INCLUDING LOCAL MEASURE “A” AND LAST INCH AFTER POP SINCES ONE AND TWO. ADDITIONALLY LOOKING TO DOCUMENT SITES AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT. IT PRO SURPRISE INVESTMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AROUND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, AND IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT. THE BILL PRIORITIZES AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITH DEPTH AFTER FORDBILITY OWE VERY LOW, LOW, AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES THE BILL HAS A REQUIREMENT 50% OF THE FUNDS ARE REQUIRED FOR HOUSING AT MINIMUM AND THE MOST COMPETITIVE APPLICATIONS FOR SB $5 WILL BE THOSE WITH 100 PERCENT HOUSING APPLICATIONS. SB5 BENEFITS FROM THE SUPPORT OF OVER 200 ORGANIZATIONS AND COALITIONS THAT WANT TO SEE THESE PARTNERSHIPS GO IN TO EFFECT. YOU HAVE RECEIVED LETTERS FROM AT LEAST 22 OF OUR LOCAL SUPPORTERS ALL URGING FOR YOUR SUPPORT SUPPORTING THIS BILL. THESE SUPPORTING INCLUDE SBLG. FIRST COMMUNITY HOUSING, SPUR, WILL WILSON CENTER, PICO, CALIFORNIA, SOUTH [ INAUDIBLE ] SB AT HOME AND SIREN AMONG OTHERS WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR BOARD VOTE FOR SUPPORTING SEN AL BILL FIVE. THANK YOU.>>THANK YOU. BEFORE YOU STEP WAY, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT C.T.A. REMAINS OPPOSED THE CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS A ASSOCIATION REMAINS OPPOSED UNLESS AMENDED. IS THAT THE CURRENT STATE OF A FAIRS?>>I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK CAN THE CAPITAL OFFICE BUT I BELIEVE THERE WERE SOME OF THOSE POSITIONS MAINTAINED?>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OTHER COMMENDS OR QUESTIONS FOR MR. PEREZ BEFORE HE STEPS WAY FROM THE MICROPHONE?>>MR. WASSERMAN WE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE HERE ON THE FLY AND MAY NOT HAVE ANSWERS ANSWERS TO ALL THE QUESTIONS. BUT THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.>>I WOULD MENTION ONE LAST THING, I BELIEVE THE DEADLINE REFERENCED WAS THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION DEADLINE END THIS IS FRIDAY.>>RIGHT. THANK YOU.>>A QUESTION FOR YOU, PLEASE.>>OH, GO AHEAD.>>THROUGH THE HAIR.>>SUPERVISOR WASSERMAN.>>YES. THANK YOU. WHEN R D.A. CAME ALONG. AND WAS ONGOING I WAS WITH THE TOWNS OF L LOS GATOS THE CITIES BENEFITED AND. CONTINUE I DIDN’T. IN SACRAMENTO THEY CHANGED AND DISSOLVED R.D.A. THE CITIES WERE HURT AND THE COUNTIES BENEFITED IT WENT BACK TO WHAT IT WAS IF 25, 30 YEARS AGO. THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR ITEM IS THE POE AT THE POTENTIALLY COSTS TO THE COUNTIES, I AM A COUNTY SUPERVISOR NOT A CITY COUNCILMAN OR MAYOR, SO MY PRIORITY IS THE COUNTIES. SINCE R.D.A. WAS DISSOLVED AND ALL OF THAT THE MONEY IS BEING FUNNELED TO THE COUNT AND I WE HAVE BEEN USING THOSE FOR GOOD PURPOSES, THIS BILL SAYS, WE WANT TO DIVERT, CHANGE THINGS A LITTLE BIT. BOTTOM PARAGRAPH ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE STAFF REPORT SAYS REQUIRES THE STATE GENERAL FUNDS TO BACKFILL SCHOOL ENTITIES I AM A BIG PROPONENT OF THE SCHOOLS AND VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE AFFECT WILL HAVE THE SCHOOLS, FOR THE ASSOCIATED LOSS OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES AND A LOT OF OUR INCOME IS BASED ON PROPERTY TAX REVENUES. AND RIGHT NOW, RIGHT NOW THE SYSTEM IS WORK BEING RIGHT NOW FOR THE COUNTY. WHAT’S HAPPENING NOW IS GOOD FOR THE COUNTIES. I AM KIND OF IT AIN’T BROKE DON’T FIX IT, THAT’S NUMBER ONE, NUMBER TWO, MY CONCERN IS RELYING ON THE STATE IN THE FUTURE, TO BACKFILL SOMETHING. SO I HAVE CONCERNS. WITH THAT FOR THOSE TWO REASONS. AND I UNDERSTAND YOU ARE NOT SENATOR AND YOU RE ASSIGNED FOR THIS BUT DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS ABOUT THE TWO CONCERNS OF MINE.>>SURE. I HAVE FACT SHEETS HANDY AS WELL. I CAN SHARE THOSE IF NEEDED. BUT –>>COULD YOU –>>THERE IS NO IMPACT TO COUNTIES, I BELIEVE IN THE REPORT ITSELF FROM YOUR COUNTY STAFF IT DOES VERIFY THAT AS WELL AS THERE IS NO IMPACT TO EDUCATION DOLLARS, THIS ISN’T TAX INCREMENT. IT’S NOT REDEVELOPMENT AS WE HAVE KNOWN IT. IT IS A TUE USE OF THE STRUCTURS FROM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES, BUT UTILIZING GENERAL UND DOLLARS AND IT’S AN IMMEDIATE BACKFILL THAT THE LEGAL SLATE I HAVE ANALYSTS OFFICE REPORTS FROM MARCH, WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHARED FROM THE BOARD AS WELL. ITVILLE DATES THE IMMEDIATE BACKFILL PREVENTING SCHOOLS FROM HAVING A FINANCIAL IMPACT.>>OKAY I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING COMMENTS FROM MY FELLOW SUPERVISORS BECAUSE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE FROM OUR STAFF ADMIN STRANGE, IS THAT THERE IS THE POTENTIAL LOSS FOR THE COUNTY UP TO $50 MILLION A YEAR AND I HAVE TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THAT.>>YOU HAVE A FACT SHEET ND I REMEMBER THEM WELL LITTLE WHY DON’T YOU HAND THEM TO THE CLERK AND ASK HER THAT WE GET THEM TO EVERY MEMBER OF THE BOARD AS WE DELIBERATE ON THIS TOPIC. AND SUPERVISOR ELLENBERG.>>THANK YOU. I DON’T HAVE A QUESTION –>>MR. PEREZ, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JUST TAKE A SEAL SEAT AND WE’LL CALL YOU BACK UP AGAIN IF WE NEED YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH.>>I REALLY HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME LOOKING AT THIS BILL, AND TALKING WITH PROBABLY A DOZEN EXPERTS IN DIFFERENT AREAS. BUSINESS AND LABOR BOTH SUPPORT THIS, WHICH IS AN EXCITING AND UNUSUAL THING. AND THE HOUSING COMMUNITY, SUPPORTS BILL AND I AM AWARE AND APPRECIATE SENATOR BELL’S TREMENDOUS AND SUCCESSFUL AHEAD VEE CASSIE FOR OUR COUNTY FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. EDUCATION COMMUNITY OPPOSES THIS BILL AS SUPERVISOR SIMITIAN MENTIONED C IT. ACTUAL. CSBA AND OTHER EDUCATION GROUPINGS. I FEEL LIKE WE ARE PITTING CHILDREN AGAINST HOUSING AND I WILL ALWAYS ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF KIDS AND THIS BILL DOES PURPORT TO PROTECT THE FUNDS AND BACKFILL, BUT THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE REQUIRED MANDATE THAT THEY DO SO. AND, OF COURSE, WHEN — IF THE BACKFILLING IS DONE, IT’S POE 10 LOYAL MONEY COMING AWAY FROM DOLLARS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN BEEN SPENT ON COUNTY SERVICES AND PROGRAMS, CALIFORNIA IS STILL IN THE LOWER 50% OF PER PL FUNDING. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE MANY, MANY SUPPORTERS WHOSE OPINIONS I REALLY VALUE GREATLY, I CAN’T — I CAN’T SUPPORT A MEASURE THAT HAS EVERYBODY THE POTENTIAL TO REDUCE FUNDS THAT OTHERWISE GO TOWARDS CHILDREN’S EDUCATION, THAT’S WHERE I AM STANDING ON THIS TODAY.>>THANK YOU. SUPERVISOR CHÁVEZ.>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I JUST WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE, ONE IS THAT I THINK YOU RAISE A GOOD POINT, SUSAN, ABOUT, YOU KNOW, BUSINESS AND LABOR. DOGS AND CATS. THAT’S PRETTY FABULOUS. AND THE OTHER THING I WOULD SAY, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE — I THINK THERE ARE VERY FEW LEADERS IN THE STATE THAT HAVE BEEN GUARDIANS FOR BOTH EDUCATION AND POOR PEOPLE AND TRANSPORTATION AS JIM. AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS THAT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE REPORT THAT WE HAVE FROM THE LEGISLATIVE, ANALYST’S OFF THE ON THE THIRD PAGE IT GIVES OUTLINE ABOUT POSSIBLE IMPACTS, MINE, NOT POSSIBLE IMPACTS BUT DIRECTLY TALKING ABOUT SCHOOLS, BUT THE VERY AST SECTION OF IT SAYS, UNDER SB5 THE STATE IS REQUIRED TO REBENCH FOR REDUCTIONS AUTHORIZED BY THE AFFORDABLE HOUSE IS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM THIS REQUIREMENTS MEANS THE STATE WOULD BE COVERING THE COST OF THE PROGRAM THROUGH ADDITIONAL GENERAL FUND SPENDING RATHER THAN REDUCTION IF SCHOOL FUNDING AND IS A HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING BECAUSE YOU WANT EXPANSION OF SCHOOL PUNISHING, I DON’T DIGRESS, HERE IS OUR DILEMMA. THIS IS WHAT I WORRY ABOUT BEING IN THE COUNTY WHEN I WAS IN THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THE OD OF ANYBODY TAKING REDEVELOPMENT DOLLARS WAS SO APPALLING TO ME BECAUSE HE WAS USING IT WISELY TO BUILD HOUSING, I DIDN’T REALLY FULLY UNDERSTAND THE IMPACTS TO THE COUNTY AND I DIDN’T REALLY FULLY UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT TO THE SCHOOLS BUT MY FEAR IS THAT THERE IS A BURSTING NEED FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO HAVE RESOURCES TO DON’T SOLVE LOCAL PROBLEMS LIKE CONSTRUCTION AND THAT IF WE DON’T LOOK FOR BILLS LOOK I CAN THIS THAT REALLY LOOKS TO HOLD HARMLESS COUNTIES AND SCHOOLSES, THAT’S REALLY WHAT JIM IS TRYING TO DO HERE, THEN WE ARE GOING TO SHUT OFF A VALVE, FRANKLY FOR AN OPPORTUNITY OF RESOURCES AND I DON’T WANT A REDIRECTION OF OUR LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SO THAT’S REASON I AM SUPPORTING THIS BILL BASE REALLY THE OTHER RISK IS EVERYBODY WHO IS LOOKING AT THE STATE AS A PIE, HAS A RISK OF LOSING SOMETHING. THAT ALL BEING SAID, I WANT TO GIVE AS MUCH FLEXIBILITY AT A LOCAL LEVEL FOR US TO MAKE DECISIONS AND OUR PROPERTY TAXES AT LEAST IN OUR COURT I, YOU KNOW, WE ARE DOING REALLY GOOD THINGS, WE ARE NOT ONLY BUILDING HOUSING AND THIS IS THE POINT I RAISE TO EVERYBODY THAT WANTS TO REDIRECT YOUR FUNDING BUT WE ARE GOING TO BE SPENDING, 350 MILLION A YEAR TO KEEP PEOPLE HOUSED AND ANY REDIRECTION OF OUR LOCAL DOLLARS WILL BE DEVASTATING BUT HERE IS THE PROBLEM, WE ARE ONE OF THE ONLY COUNTIES IN THE STATE THAT ARE DOING THIS. SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT, YOU KNOW, OTHER COU COUNTIES DEFENDING THR FUNDS THEY ARE SPENDING MORE ON ROADS THAN WE ARE. WE ARE SPENDING SO MUCH OF OUR PROPERTY TAX ON MENTAL EALTH SERVICES, SCHOOL-LINKED SERVICES, ALL OF THAT. OUR FLEXIBLE FUNDING WE ARE PUTTING IN TO SERVICES NOT IN TO ROAD REPAIR, WHICH FRANKLY I SEE A LOT OF OTHER COUNTYS DOING IT AND YOU ARE ON C SACK SO YOU KNOW MORE THAN I DO ABOUT WHAT SOME OF THOSE POO PRIORITIES ARI WILL SUPPORT THIS, I REALLY APPRECIATE AND I WANT TO SAY THIS TO YOU, I REALLY APPRECIATE JIM TRYING TO BE FLEXIBLE AND A STATEWIDE PEACEMAKER IN TERMS OF HOW WE SHARE RESOURCES SO THANK YOU.>>THANK YOU. COLLEAGUES. HERE IS WHAT I WANT TO SAY, I APPRECIATE THE EFFORT. I HAVE BEEN IN SENATOR BELL’S SHOES TRYING TO GET TO YES WITH A MIX OF INTERESTED TAKE SHOULDERS IT’S A DIFFICULT TASK A PLOWED HIM OR HIS EFFORT AND APPLAUD HIS COMMITMENT O THE EFFORT TO FIND FUNDING FOR HOUSING, THAT BEING SAID, I CAN’T GET TO YES TODAY. THAT BEING SAID I DON’T WANT TO RAIN ON THE PARADE. I DON’T WANT TO — I CERTAINLY DON’T WANT TO CAST A NO VOTE THAT WILL BE MISCONSTRUED AS N OPPOSITION TO HOUSING OR TO THE BILL WHICH IS NOT A POSITION I WANT S TO TAKE. MY OFFICE HAS BEEN IN CONTACT WITH SENATOR BELL’S OFFICE AS WELL, AND IT’S MY UNDERSTANDING HIS OFFICE WHILE THEY WERE PREFER A SUPPORT POSITION, WOULD PREFER A SIMPLY NOT TAKING A POSITION AT ALL, TO A NEUTRAL POSITION. ON THE MATTER IF THAT’S THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE FROM OUR CONVERSATIONS. HERE IS MY TAKE. WE ARE ALKING ABOUT REDIRECTING EVENING INDICATION FUNDS, THAT’S WHY IT’S CALLED E RAV. THE [ INAUDIBLE ] FUND. THAT IS ALWAYS A CHANCEY PROPOSITION. YES, THE BILL CALLS FOR REPLENISHING THOSE FUNDS, BUT THAT PRESUME THAT THERE WILL ALWAYS BE SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO REPLENISH THEM WHICH I ASSUME IS WHAT’S MADE THE FOLKS AT BOTH CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ZONES AND THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION ANXIOUS. OUR STAFF HAS A HIGHLIGHTED SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT CONCERN THAT SUPERVISOR ASSERMAN REFERENCED. AND THAT’S THE CONCERN THAT BY DEFINITION, IF THANK YOU TAKE $200 MILLION FROM ONE PART OF THE BUDGET AND USE IT FOR THIS NEW EXPEND DID I PURE PURPOSE IMMATERIAL E. THE BACKFILL THAT’S $200 MILLION THAT’S NOT AVAILABLE FOLLOW OTHER ROGRAMS AND SERVICES THAT OUR COUNTY FUNDS AND SUPPORTS. TRUE ENOUGH. AND HERE IS THE PART THAT FOR ME HAS PARTICULARLY DISCONCERTING OVER THE LONGER TEAM, IF I READ THIS RIGHT, CORRECT ME IF I’M WRONG WE ARE LOOKING AT $200 MILLION A YEAR FOR FIVE YEAR OLD EXAMINE EN THIS UP TO 250 MILLION IN THE SUBSEQUENT FIVE YEARS. I AM LACKING TO MR. PA TREMENDOUS SEEING IF HE WILL GIVE ME A NOD. WE KEEP TALK ABOUT THE INEVITABLE RECESSION WHAT HAPPENS WHEN IT ARRIVES. THE ANSWER IS THAT MONEY THAT IS CURRENTLY COMMITTED TO BACKFILL THE ERA F MONEY, MAY VERY WELL NOT BE THERE. WE MAY BE LOOKING BILLIONS OR 10s OF BILL YOURS OF DOLLARS OF CUTS. THAT’S AN ARGUMENT I WAS HERE I WAS IN IS BEING WHEN WE HAD TO CUT $28 BILLION IN A SINGLE YEAR AND STUFF WE THINK OF AS NEAR AND DEAR AND ABSOLUTELY GETS HACK BECAUSE IT HAS TO. AND THIS $200 MILLION COMMITTED ERA F AND LOCAL INJURE DITCHESES ARE A CUSTOM TO REACHING THAT 2 BILLION, 200 MILLION A YEAR. IF AND WHEN THAT HARD TIME COMES THAT MEANS THAT THINGS WE HOLD NEAR AND DEAR HERE WILL BE SUDDENLY LOST. I THINK RATHER THAN TAKE AN OPPOSED POSITION WHICH I DO NOT WANT TO DO OR EVENING TAKE A NEWT RAT POSITION I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IF THERE IS A SUBSTITUTE MOTION WHICH ONE MOVE COLLEAGUES SAID IS NO POSITION. WE’LL TAKE A NO POSITION IT WILL BE AN INTERESTING CONVERSATION AND WE’LL SEE HOW IT PLAYS OUT IN SACRAMENTO WITHOUT OUR WEIGHING IN. IS THERE SUCH A MOTION? IF NOT, THEN — I AM SORRY. SOMEBODY JUST SAY OUT LOUD. I WOULD LIKE MOVE A SUBSTOUT MOTION TO TAKE NO POSITION IF SOMEBODY IS WILLING TO DO THAT. OKAY, I HAVE A SUBSTITUTE MOTION FROM MS. ELLENBERG A SECOND FROM SUPER WASSER WASSERMAN. MADAM CLERK IF THE POSITION PASSES WE SAY WE TAKE NO POSITION IF THE MOTION VEILS WE’LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON THE MEASURE BEFORE US ON THE SCREEN. ALL CLEAR? GOOD. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE SUBSTITUTE MOTION WHICH IS TO TAKE NO POSITION, PLEASE SAY I AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. I. THOSE OPPOSED PLEASE SAY NAY. OR LEFT-HAND AS YOU CHOOSE, LL RIGHT. NO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *